TLDR Strategy submitted a 12-page letter pushing back against MSCI’s proposed rule that would exclude companies with over 50% crypto holdings from stock indexes The company argues the 50% threshold would create “whiplash” and inconsistent treatment due to different accounting rules between IFRS and U.S. GAAP Strategy claims MSCI includes other single-asset businesses like REITs [...] The post Strategy (MSTR) Stock: Bitcoin Treasury Giant Fights Back Against Index Exclusion appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Strategy submitted a 12-page letter pushing back against MSCI’s proposed rule that would exclude companies with over 50% crypto holdings from stock indexes The company argues the 50% threshold would create “whiplash” and inconsistent treatment due to different accounting rules between IFRS and U.S. GAAP Strategy claims MSCI includes other single-asset businesses like REITs [...] The post Strategy (MSTR) Stock: Bitcoin Treasury Giant Fights Back Against Index Exclusion appeared first on CoinCentral.

Strategy (MSTR) Stock: Bitcoin Treasury Giant Fights Back Against Index Exclusion

2025/12/11 17:28

TLDR

  • Strategy submitted a 12-page letter pushing back against MSCI’s proposed rule that would exclude companies with over 50% crypto holdings from stock indexes
  • The company argues the 50% threshold would create “whiplash” and inconsistent treatment due to different accounting rules between IFRS and U.S. GAAP
  • Strategy claims MSCI includes other single-asset businesses like REITs and oil companies, making the crypto exclusion unfair
  • JPMorgan estimates Strategy could face $2.8 billion to $8.8 billion in passive outflows if removed from indexes
  • MSCI’s final decision is expected by January 15, 2025, ahead of February’s index rebalancing

Strategy fired back at index giant MSCI this week over a proposed policy change that could kick bitcoin treasury companies out of major stock indexes. The company submitted a lengthy response arguing the move would hurt investors and clash with U.S. government policy.


MSTR Stock Card
MicroStrategy Incorporated, MSTR

The dispute centers on MSCI’s plan to exclude companies whose balance sheets hold more than 50% in digital assets. Strategy, which holds 660,624 BTC worth around $61 billion, would be the biggest company affected by the change.

MSCI announced the review in October. The index provider argues that bitcoin treasury firms act more like investment funds than operating companies. Strategy and other critics say that’s wrong.

In its 12-page letter sent Wednesday, Strategy made several arguments against the exclusion. The company said digital asset treasury firms are operating businesses that actively manage their holdings. Strategy pointed to its Bitcoin-backed credit instruments as proof of operational activities.

Bitcoin Regulation, Stocks, MicroStrategySource: Strategy

The letter highlighted an accounting problem with the 50% rule. Companies reporting under IFRS can keep bitcoin at cost on their books. U.S. companies using GAAP must mark holdings to fair value each quarter.

This means two identical businesses could be treated differently based only on where they report. Strategy warned this would cause companies to “whipsaw on and off” indexes as bitcoin prices move. The result would be chaos for index providers and investors.

Other Single-Asset Companies Stay in Indexes

Strategy also questioned why MSCI includes other businesses focused on single assets. Real estate investment trusts hold primarily real estate. Oil companies focus on petroleum. Media companies own content portfolios.

The company wrote that many financial institutions hold specific asset types and create derivatives from them. Residential mortgage-backed securities work this way. Yet these businesses remain in MSCI indexes.

The bitcoin treasury company framed the proposal as working against U.S. policy goals. Strategy cited President Trump’s initiatives promoting digital asset development. These include the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and expanded 401(k) access to crypto.

The letter argued that blocking bitcoin treasury firms would lock them out of roughly $15 trillion in passive investment capital. This would “stifle innovation” and hurt U.S. efforts to lead in crypto adoption.

Potential Impact on Strategy Stock

JPMorgan analysts ran numbers on what removal would mean. They estimated Strategy could see about $2.8 billion in passive outflows if dropped from indexes. That figure could climb to $8.8 billion if other index providers follow MSCI’s lead.

Strategy stock has dropped over 50% in the past year. Bitcoin itself fell 15% from its early 2025 price above $109,000 to current levels around $90,000. The underlying asset actually beat the stock wrapper’s performance.

MSCI raised concerns about volatility and correlation risks. Companies heavy in crypto could make indexes more volatile. Index performance might start mirroring crypto market swings instead of broader equity markets.

Federal Reserve research backs up these worries. Bitcoin and Ether show much higher volatility than stock indexes, oil, or gold. The Fed noted that crypto traders commonly use leverage, which makes price swings even bigger.

Other bitcoin treasury companies joined the pushback. Strive told MSCI last week the 50% threshold creates problems. The firm suggested MSCI could offer optional versions of indexes that exclude digital asset treasury companies for clients who want that.

MSCI plans to announce its final decision by January 15, 2025. Any changes would take effect during the February index rebalancing.

The post Strategy (MSTR) Stock: Bitcoin Treasury Giant Fights Back Against Index Exclusion appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future

Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future

BitcoinWorld Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future In the dynamic world of decentralized computing, exciting developments are constantly shaping the future. Today, all eyes are on Akash Network, the innovative supercloud project, as it proposes a significant change to its tokenomics. This move aims to strengthen the value of its native token, AKT, and further solidify its position in the competitive blockchain space. The community is buzzing about a newly submitted governance proposal that could introduce a game-changing Burn Mint Equilibrium (BME) model. What is the Burn Mint Equilibrium (BME) for Akash Network? The core of this proposal revolves around a concept called Burn Mint Equilibrium, or BME. Essentially, this model is designed to create a balance in the token’s circulating supply by systematically removing a portion of tokens from existence. For Akash Network, this means burning an amount of AKT that is equivalent to the U.S. dollar value of fees paid by network users. Fee Conversion: When users pay for cloud services on the Akash Network, these fees are typically collected in various cryptocurrencies or stablecoins. AKT Equivalence: The proposal suggests converting the U.S. dollar value of these collected fees into an equivalent amount of AKT. Token Burn: This calculated amount of AKT would then be permanently removed from circulation, or ‘burned’. This mechanism creates a direct link between network utility and token supply reduction. As more users utilize the decentralized supercloud, more AKT will be burned, potentially impacting the token’s scarcity and value. Why is This Proposal Crucial for AKT Holders? For anyone holding AKT, or considering investing in the Akash Network ecosystem, this proposal carries significant weight. Token burning mechanisms are often viewed as a positive development because they can lead to increased scarcity. When supply decreases while demand remains constant or grows, the price per unit tends to increase. Here are some key benefits: Increased Scarcity: Burning tokens reduces the total circulating supply of AKT. This makes each remaining token potentially more valuable over time. Demand-Supply Dynamics: The BME model directly ties the burning of AKT to network usage. Higher adoption of the Akash Network supercloud translates into more fees, and thus more AKT burned. Long-Term Value Proposition: By creating a deflationary pressure, the proposal aims to enhance AKT’s long-term value, making it a more attractive asset for investors and long-term holders. This strategic move demonstrates a commitment from the Akash Network community to optimize its tokenomics for sustainable growth and value appreciation. How Does BME Impact the Decentralized Supercloud Mission? Beyond token value, the BME proposal aligns perfectly with the broader mission of the Akash Network. As a decentralized supercloud, Akash provides a marketplace for cloud computing resources, allowing users to deploy applications faster, more efficiently, and at a lower cost than traditional providers. The BME model reinforces this utility. Consider these impacts: Network Health: A stronger AKT token can incentivize more validators and providers to secure and contribute resources to the network, improving its overall health and resilience. Ecosystem Growth: Enhanced token value can attract more developers and projects to build on the Akash Network, fostering a vibrant and diverse ecosystem. User Incentive: While users pay fees, the potential appreciation of AKT could indirectly benefit those who hold the token, creating a circular economy within the supercloud. This proposal is not just about burning tokens; it’s about building a more robust, self-sustaining, and economically sound decentralized cloud infrastructure for the future. What Are the Next Steps for the Akash Network Community? As a governance proposal, the BME model will now undergo a period of community discussion and voting. This is a crucial phase where AKT holders and network participants can voice their opinions, debate the merits, and ultimately decide on the future direction of the project. Transparency and community engagement are hallmarks of decentralized projects like Akash Network. Challenges and Considerations: Implementation Complexity: Ensuring the burning mechanism is technically sound and transparent will be vital. Community Consensus: Achieving broad agreement within the diverse Akash Network community is key for successful adoption. The outcome of this vote will significantly shape the tokenomics and economic model of the Akash Network, influencing its trajectory in the rapidly evolving decentralized cloud landscape. The proposal to introduce a Burn Mint Equilibrium model represents a bold and strategic step for Akash Network. By directly linking network usage to token scarcity, the project aims to create a more resilient and valuable AKT token, ultimately strengthening its position as a leading decentralized supercloud provider. This move underscores the project’s commitment to innovative tokenomics and sustainable growth, promising an exciting future for both users and investors in the Akash Network ecosystem. It’s a clear signal that Akash is actively working to enhance its value proposition and maintain its competitive edge in the decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1. What is the main goal of the Burn Mint Equilibrium (BME) proposal for Akash Network? The primary goal is to adjust the circulating supply of AKT tokens by burning a portion of network fees, thereby creating deflationary pressure and potentially enhancing the token’s long-term value and scarcity. 2. How will the amount of AKT to be burned be determined? The proposal suggests burning an amount of AKT equivalent to the U.S. dollar value of fees paid by users on the Akash Network for cloud services. 3. What are the potential benefits for AKT token holders? Token holders could benefit from increased scarcity of AKT, which may lead to higher demand and appreciation in value over time, especially as network usage grows. 4. How does this proposal relate to the overall mission of Akash Network? The BME model reinforces the Akash Network‘s mission by creating a stronger, more economically robust ecosystem. A healthier token incentivizes network participants, fostering growth and stability for the decentralized supercloud. 5. What is the next step for this governance proposal? The proposal will undergo a period of community discussion and voting by AKT token holders. The community’s decision will determine if the BME model is implemented on the Akash Network. If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network! Your support helps us bring more valuable insights into the world of decentralized technology. Stay informed and help spread the word about the exciting developments happening within Akash Network. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized cloud solutions price action. This post Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/22 21:35