The post What Is Happening With And To The New York Mets? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OMG is right, but so too is LOL. Brandon Nimmo (holding the sign)The post What Is Happening With And To The New York Mets? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OMG is right, but so too is LOL. Brandon Nimmo (holding the sign)

What Is Happening With And To The New York Mets?

OMG is right, but so too is LOL. Brandon Nimmo (holding the sign) is no longer a Met, neither is Edwin Díaz or Pete Alonso. David Stearns has a lot of work to do. (Photo by Justin Berl/Getty Images)

Getty Images

What has happened to the New York Mets? In a matter of weeks, the team that contended over the past few seasons has been stripped down, and the club that takes the diamond next season won’t look very much like the ones that previously played in Queens. And whether or not the new formulation is successful, the fans are none too pleased.

Goodbye Brandon Nimmo

In November, in what is commonly-referred to as a “challenge trade,” the Mets swapped their longest-tenured player, outfielder Brandon Nimmo, to the Texas Rangers in return for second baseman Marcus Semien. The deal saves New York some money in the long run, as they rid themselves of the five years and $101.25 million left on Nimmo’s eight-year deal he signed in 2023. Semien is owed just $72 million over the final three years of the seven-year, $175 million contract he signed with Texas in December 2021. The Mets also threw in an additional $5 million to offset the difference.

David Stearns, New York’s president of baseball operations, went into the off-season looking to improve the team’s defense. And although he has multiple prospects ready to play second base, he felt the move for Semien – at the cost of Nimmo – was the right choice. After the deal he was quoted as saying losing a fan-favorite like Nimmo “was something we had to think about, no question. That certainly makes decisions like this a little bit more challenging than they otherwise would be. But at the end of the day, I still felt like this was the right decision for the organization.”

Goodbye Edwin Díaz

On Tuesday, the back-to-back World Series champion Los Angeles Dodgers signed closer Edwin Díaz to a three-year, $69 million contract, which, on its face, is three million more than the Mets offered their former closer. However, according to Joel Sherman of the New York Post, the deal includes deferrals of $4.5 million per season, taking the deal down to $21.1 million per season for luxury tax purposes. Could the Mets, under the auspices of the richest owner in baseball, have managed to dig up another $3 million (and less than that on a pure cash flow basis) to keep Timmy Trumpets playing in CitiField for the next three seasons? That seems reasonable. Which raises maybe a larger question: Why didn’t Díaz give them a chance to match the offer? What does it say about the organization that he wanted to head west?

Goodbye Pete Alonso

On Wednesday, Pete Alonso, the team’s all-time home run leader with 264, departed to Baltimore on a 5-year, $155 million contract. The Mets, apparently, were not willing to go beyond three years for the slugger, so didn’t even bother to make an offer. Considering that the day before Alonso signed with the Orioles, fellow slugger Kyle Schwarber re-signed with the Phillies for five years and $150 million, and that he is two years older than the “Polar Bear,” and doesn’t play a defensive position, it is either shocking that the Mets let a franchise player go, or surprising that Philadelphia was willing to roll the dice so substantially. The former is a better analysis.

With Alonso out of the lineup and out of the clubhouse, New York loses the heart and soul of the club, the leader of the “LFGM” brigade, who never found a moment when he couldn’t or wouldn’t rip off his jersey and celebrate with his teammates. There was a real chance that he could have retired as a Met, and if he collected another 236 homers, potentially been the third player (after Tom Seaver and Mike Piazza) to enter the Hall of Fame with a Mets logo on his cap.

There Is Still Time

There are still two months before pitchers and catchers report, and Stearns still has a lot of wheeling and dealing to do. But that may not placate the fans. Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic wrote this morning: “The irrational Mets fan, the long-suffering type who suffered through the years of the Wilpon ownership, now must wonder if Fred and Jeff are practicing voodoo on Stearns and owner Steve Cohen.”

With all of the losses (and the addition of Semien and new closer Devin Williams), the team still has not addressed its biggest need: starting pitching. The team set an MLB record for pitchers used by one team in 2025, including 17 different starters. Framber Valdez, Ranger Suárez, and Tatsuya Imai are still available in the free agent market. Maybe the goodwill of acquiring Semien will help with the bad taste of losing Alonso, and uber-agent Scott Boras will direct Imai, the Japanese superstar, to Stearns and Cohen and help quiet the critics. Or, better yet, the team could reach deep into its prospects and some toss in some players on the major league roster, and pull off a blockbuster trade to bring two-time Cy Young winner Tarik Skubal to New York. Stranger things have happened.

The team could still sign Kyle Tucker and let him fill the void in left field caused by the loss of Nimmo. And/or they could add Cody Bellinger, and allow him to become the center fielder they have needed for years, or slot him at first base to fill the Alonso-sized hole on the right side of the infield.

This much is true: the addition of Williams as a Yankees cast-off is not going to move the needle if that is their only major move. As Rosenthal wrote: “The rational Mets fan knows it’s Dec. 10. The irrational Mets fan doesn’t want to hear it.”

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danfreedman/2025/12/11/what-is-happening-with-and-to-the-new-york-mets/

Market Opportunity
OmiseGo Logo
OmiseGo Price(OMG)
$0.05827
$0.05827$0.05827
-0.30%
USD
OmiseGo (OMG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Ultimea Unveils Skywave X100 Dual: 9.2.6 Wireless Home Theater Launching March 2026

Ultimea Unveils Skywave X100 Dual: 9.2.6 Wireless Home Theater Launching March 2026

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, Calif., Feb. 12, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Ultimea, a leader in immersive home entertainment, announces the upcoming launch of its next-generation flagship
Share
AI Journal2026/02/13 02:45
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

BitcoinWorld Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders The dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, bringing forth new opportunities and innovations. A significant development is currently unfolding at Curve Finance, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX). Its founder, Michael Egorov, has put forth an exciting proposal designed to offer a more direct path for token holders to earn revenue. This initiative, centered around a new Curve Finance revenue sharing model, aims to bolster the value for those actively participating in the protocol’s governance. What is the “Yield Basis” Proposal and How Does it Work? At the core of this forward-thinking initiative is a new protocol dubbed Yield Basis. Michael Egorov introduced this concept on the CurveDAO governance forum, outlining a mechanism to distribute sustainable profits directly to CRV holders. Specifically, it targets those who stake their CRV tokens to gain veCRV, which are essential for governance participation within the Curve ecosystem. Let’s break down the initial steps of this innovative proposal: crvUSD Issuance: Before the Yield Basis protocol goes live, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued. Strategic Fund Allocation: The funds generated from the sale of these crvUSD tokens will be strategically deployed into three distinct Bitcoin-based liquidity pools: WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC. Pool Capping: To ensure balanced risk and diversified exposure, each of these pools will be capped at $10 million. This carefully designed structure aims to establish a robust and consistent income stream, forming the bedrock of a sustainable Curve Finance revenue sharing mechanism. Why is This Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Significant for CRV Holders? This proposal marks a pivotal moment for CRV holders, particularly those dedicated to the long-term health and governance of Curve Finance. Historically, generating revenue for token holders in the DeFi space can often be complex. The Yield Basis proposal simplifies this by offering a more direct and transparent pathway to earnings. By staking CRV for veCRV, holders are not merely engaging in governance; they are now directly positioned to benefit from the protocol’s overall success. The significance of this development is multifaceted: Direct Profit Distribution: veCRV holders are set to receive a substantial share of the profits generated by the Yield Basis protocol. Incentivized Governance: This direct financial incentive encourages more users to stake their CRV, which in turn strengthens the protocol’s decentralized governance structure. Enhanced Value Proposition: The promise of sustainable revenue sharing could significantly boost the inherent value of holding and staking CRV tokens. Ultimately, this move underscores Curve Finance’s dedication to rewarding its committed community and ensuring the long-term vitality of its ecosystem through effective Curve Finance revenue sharing. Understanding the Mechanics: Profit Distribution and Ecosystem Support The distribution model for Yield Basis has been thoughtfully crafted to strike a balance between rewarding veCRV holders and supporting the wider Curve ecosystem. Under the terms of the proposal, a substantial portion of the value generated by Yield Basis will flow back to those who contribute to the protocol’s governance. Returns for veCRV Holders: A significant share, specifically between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis, will be distributed to veCRV holders. This flexible range allows for dynamic adjustments based on market conditions and the protocol’s performance. Ecosystem Reserve: Crucially, 25% of the Yield Basis tokens will be reserved exclusively for the Curve ecosystem. This allocation can be utilized for various strategic purposes, such as funding ongoing development, issuing grants, or further incentivizing liquidity providers. This ensures the continuous growth and innovation of the platform. The proposal is currently undergoing a democratic vote on the CurveDAO governance forum, giving the community a direct voice in shaping the future of Curve Finance revenue sharing. The voting period is scheduled to conclude on September 24th. What’s Next for Curve Finance and CRV Holders? The proposed Yield Basis protocol represents a pioneering approach to sustainable revenue generation and community incentivization within the DeFi landscape. If approved by the community, this Curve Finance revenue sharing model has the potential to establish a new benchmark for how decentralized exchanges reward their most dedicated participants. It aims to foster a more robust and engaged community by directly linking governance participation with tangible financial benefits. This strategic move by Michael Egorov and the Curve Finance team highlights a strong commitment to innovation and strengthening the decentralized nature of the protocol. For CRV holders, a thorough understanding of this proposal is crucial for making informed decisions regarding their staking strategies and overall engagement with one of DeFi’s foundational platforms. FAQs about Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Q1: What is the main goal of the Yield Basis proposal? A1: The primary goal is to establish a more direct and sustainable way for CRV token holders who stake their tokens (receiving veCRV) to earn revenue from the Curve Finance protocol. Q2: How will funds be generated for the Yield Basis protocol? A2: Initially, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued and sold. The funds from this sale will then be allocated to three Bitcoin-based pools (WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC), with each pool capped at $10 million, to generate profits. Q3: Who benefits from the Yield Basis revenue sharing? A3: The proposal states that between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis will be returned to veCRV holders, who are CRV stakers participating in governance. Q4: What is the purpose of the 25% reserve for the Curve ecosystem? A4: This 25% reserve of Yield Basis tokens is intended to support the broader Curve ecosystem, potentially funding development, grants, or other initiatives that contribute to the platform’s growth and sustainability. Q5: When is the vote on the Yield Basis proposal? A5: A vote on the proposal is currently underway on the CurveDAO governance forum and is scheduled to run until September 24th. If you found this article insightful and valuable, please consider sharing it with your friends, colleagues, and followers on social media! Your support helps us continue to deliver important DeFi insights and analysis to a wider audience. To learn more about the latest DeFi market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized finance institutional adoption. This post Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:35