TLDR Binance froze only a portion of requested funds linked to the Upbit hack. Investigators asked Binance to freeze $370,000 in Solana assets after Upbit hack.TLDR Binance froze only a portion of requested funds linked to the Upbit hack. Investigators asked Binance to freeze $370,000 in Solana assets after Upbit hack.

Upbit Hack Puts Binance’s Response to Emergency Freeze Requests at Risk

2025/12/12 21:09

TLDR

  • Binance froze only a portion of requested funds linked to the Upbit hack.
  • Investigators asked Binance to freeze $370,000 in Solana assets after Upbit hack.
  • Binance delayed freezing assets by 15 hours, citing the need for verification.
  • Rapid freezes are crucial to limit damage from cryptocurrency exchange hacks.

A recent hack of South Korea’s Upbit exchange has drawn attention to Binance’s emergency freeze policy. The incident, which took place on November 27, 2025, involved unauthorized withdrawals of Solana-based assets worth approximately $36 million. Following the hack, police requested Binance to freeze a portion of funds believed to be linked to the stolen assets. However, Binance’s response has raised concerns over the effectiveness and timeliness of its emergency freeze procedures.

Police Request for Asset Freeze

According to reports by South Korean broadcaster KBS, investigators requested Binance to freeze around 470 million Korean won ($370,000) worth of Solana (SOL) tokens. These funds were believed to be connected to the hack on Upbit.

Binance responded to the request by freezing only about $55,000, or roughly 17% of the requested amount. This action was taken after a delay of 15 hours, which Binance attributed to the need for additional verification. The delay has led to questions about the exchange’s process for responding to asset freeze requests from law enforcement.

Binance’s Response to Law Enforcement Requests

In a statement, a Binance spokesperson clarified that the exchange responds to law enforcement requests exclusively through official channels. The spokesperson confirmed Binance’s commitment to cooperating with relevant authorities, noting that it works closely with global agencies to assist investigations into illicit activities. However, Binance did not comment specifically on the details of the Upbit hack or the police request in question, citing company policy.

The delay in freezing assets has brought Binance’s emergency freeze policies under scrutiny. Experts argue that in cases involving stolen cryptocurrency, a quick response is essential to prevent further damage. Cho Jae-woo, director of Hansung University’s Blockchain Research Institute, emphasized the importance of rapid asset freezes in limiting the financial impact of hacks. He suggested that exchanges should establish a global hotline to facilitate immediate action in these situations.

Upbit’s Efforts to Track Stolen Funds

Following the hack, Upbit has worked closely with local authorities to trace and recover the stolen funds. A spokesperson from the exchange confirmed that law enforcement is actively investigating the incident. Upbit also reached out to major global exchanges, including Binance, to request the freezing of any assets linked to the attack. Despite the setback in Binance’s response, Upbit remains focused on tracking down the attackers and recovering the stolen assets.

In an effort to prevent further incidents, Upbit has also implemented additional security measures to protect user funds. The exchange continues to collaborate with global exchanges and law enforcement agencies to ensure that any stolen funds are promptly frozen and returned.

The Need for Global Cooperation

This incident underscores the challenges that centralized cryptocurrency exchanges face when responding to asset freeze requests from foreign law enforcement agencies. While exchanges are generally cautious about freezing assets due to legal and litigation risks, rapid cooperation is often necessary to mitigate the effects of hacks.

Experts have called for clearer and more streamlined procedures between exchanges and law enforcement to facilitate faster freezes of suspected stolen assets. A global emergency freeze hotline, as suggested by Cho Jae-woo, could play a key role in reducing delays and ensuring that stolen cryptocurrency is quickly contained.

As the investigation continues, the response from Binance, as well as other exchanges, will likely be closely monitored. The Upbit hack highlights the critical need for efficient and timely responses to minimize losses from cybersecurity incidents in the cryptocurrency space.

The post Upbit Hack Puts Binance’s Response to Emergency Freeze Requests at Risk appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37