The post XRP Monthly MACD Signals Historic Shift Amid ETF Rush appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The monthly MACD cross prints of XRP show a bearish; the ETFsThe post XRP Monthly MACD Signals Historic Shift Amid ETF Rush appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The monthly MACD cross prints of XRP show a bearish; the ETFs

XRP Monthly MACD Signals Historic Shift Amid ETF Rush

2025/12/13 15:47

The monthly MACD cross prints of XRP show a bearish; the ETFs aim at 42.87 percent of the liquid supply. The 2018 and 2022 trends indicate a significant reversal of trend in the future.

The monthly technical indicators of XRP cause flash alerts. The bearish MACD cross has just emerged on the monthly charts. Steph_iscrypto on X says this is a 2018 and 2022 arrangement. These two past events caused a full reversal of trends.

Source: Steph_iscrypto 

The currency is being traded when institutional demand is gaining speed. ETF products grabbed close to a billion dollars in 18 days. There are five spot ETF products in operation on U.S. exchanges. The market structure is undergoing a transformation it has never seen before due to the regulated products.

Critical changes in momentum are presented through technical analysis. MACD crosses within a month are also uncommon. The indicator quantifies direction changes and strength of the trend. Past bearish crosses were those observed in 2018 and 2022 followed by multiple years of declines.

You might also like: XRP RSI Reset Signals Bullish Setup as ETFs Near $1B

The 42.87% Supply Target Changes Everything

ETF demand prioritizes liquid supply solely. On X, SMQKEDQG emphasized that 42.87% is the actual circulation of XRP. Aggregate supply deceives market participants. Real supply dynamics are defined by the available pool.

Source:  SMQKEDQG

Existing ETFs are 0.75% of the total supply. Such a percentage does not appear large at the outset. But ETFs draw only on the 42.87% liquid pool. Every incremental supply narrows the market supply.

The mathematics creates supply pressure quickly.  ETFs do not require 100% of the aggregate supply. They would just have to decrease the 42.87% available percentage. The liquid pool reduces as institutional inflows are made. Markets already shape up supply pressure at an early stage.

The OTC books hold institutional liquidity. Institutional demand was previously cushioned by these reserves. OTC drains are now consumed by ETFs at an accelerating pace. The supply shock schedule condenses with the accumulation increase.

You might also like: XRP Coiling: Expansion Phase Imminent After Accumulation?

Historical Patterns Point to Volatility

The 2018 MACD cross was followed by prolonged weakness. After that technical signal, XRP went down a lot. During that time, market sentiment changed towards the extreme. Similar pressure was produced in the 2022 cross.

The present market dynamics are not similar to previous stages. Product ETFs generate new sources of demand. Increased institutional access under regulation alters the usual dynamics. The issuers of ETFs report that the quality of inflows is extremely high, and over 70% of the participants are institutional investors.

Custodial accumulation speeds up the removal of supply. Spot ETFs are considered to keep the underlying asset in a deposit, where each share bought will lead to the removal of actual XRP in circulation. It is a mechanism that contrasts with futures products.  

Source: https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/xrp-monthly-macd-signals-historic-shift-amid-etf-rush/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09