Apollo Global Management, one of the world’s largest alternative asset managers, has made strategic bets against the debt of several enterprise software companiesApollo Global Management, one of the world’s largest alternative asset managers, has made strategic bets against the debt of several enterprise software companies

Apollo backs AI to disrupt the software making sector

2025/12/13 22:00

Apollo Global Management, one of the world’s largest alternative asset managers, has made strategic bets against the debt of several enterprise software companies, citing growing concerns about how artificial intelligence could weaken parts of the tech sector.

Apollo took short positions on loans from software providers, including Internet Brands, SonicWall, and Perforce, because it feared that those institutions’ traditional business models might face earnings pressures as AI platforms automate functions once sold as high-margin software services.

However, the bets, which represented a fraction of its $700 billion credit portfolio and were maintained for much of the year, have now been closed.

Apollo warns that AI could harm the enterprise software industry

Apollo claims that AI poses risks to enterprise software, the largest target for private capital over the past decade. Other private lenders have also argued similarly, stating that software stands out as one of the most exposed sectors to AI, as the technology can automate many functions currently handled by coding tools, customer support software, and routine financial systems.

Nonetheless, Apollo’s short bets were just a small slice of its $700 billion credit book—less than 1%—according to a person familiar with the matter, with some of the funds used as hedges.

However, the software loans that Apollo bet against fell in value at times this year, but they’re all now trading above 80 cents on the dollar, halting concerns about near-term trouble. Though since the early 2010s, buyout specialists have borrowed hundreds of billions to acquire software firms, as lenders increasingly value recurring revenue and strong margins. 

Apollo still recognises that AI could benefit software companies, but its top executives have decided to cut exposure, preferring not to take directional industry positions. Marc Rowan, at a recent conference, even commented,  “I don’t know whether that’s going to be enterprise software, which could […] benefit or be destroyed by this. As a lender, I’m not sure I want to be there to find out.” 

Apollo is working to push software exposure across its credit portfolios below 10%.

Apollo has steadily reduced its exposure by lending to the sector throughout the year. At the start of 2025, roughly a fifth of Apollo’s private credit funds were tied to software groups, but that exposure has now been almost halved, Rowan said in closed-door investor meetings at a Goldman Sachs conference on Wednesday, a source in attendance said.

According to Rowan, the firm aims for software exposure across its credit funds to fall below 10% of net assets. It has been internally assessing which companies may be most vulnerable to AI disruption, and many other investors share similar concerns.

At an FT conference in October, Blackstone’s president, Jonathan Gray, warned that investors were underestimating the potential for disruption from technology, stating that he has challenged dealmakers to prominently quantify AI risks in their investment memos and identify specific companies as particularly vulnerable. 

Gray commented, “We’ve told our credit and equity teams: address AI on the first pages of your investment memos. If you think about rules-based businesses — legal, accounting, transaction and claims processing — this is going to be profound.” 

Join Bybit now and claim a $50 bonus in minutes

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.03785
$0.03785$0.03785
+1.25%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
PA Daily | Moonshot launches New XAI gork ($gork); analysis shows that Trump’s crypto assets account for about 40% of his total assets

PA Daily | Moonshot launches New XAI gork ($gork); analysis shows that Trump’s crypto assets account for about 40% of his total assets

CryptoQuant predicts three future trend scenarios for Bitcoin: in an optimistic scenario, it will rise to $150,000 to $175,000; Binance Alpha will launch Anon, BEETS and SHADOW; Moonshot announced the launch of New XAI gork ($gork).
Share
PANews2025/05/01 17:30
XRP ETF’s bereiken belangrijke mijlpaal: $1 miljard aan netto instroom

XRP ETF’s bereiken belangrijke mijlpaal: $1 miljard aan netto instroom

De markt voor crypto-exchange-traded funds (ETF’s) heeft opnieuw een belangrijke mijlpaal bereikt. XRP ETF’s hebben gezamenlijk meer dan 1 miljard dollar aan netto
Share
Coinstats2025/12/16 21:01