Share
Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
Opinion
Share
Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
MSCI Isn't Wrong to Be Cautious on DATs
As
Opinion
Share
Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
MSCI Isn't Wrong to Be Cautious on DATs
As
MSCI Isn't Wrong to Be Cautious on DATs
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
MSCI Isn't Wrong to Be Cautious on DATs
As leading index provider MSCI considers excluding digital asset treasuries (DATs) from its suite of indexes, it’s worth considering the risk profile of these investment vehicles to determine if they truly meet these benchmarks, says Nic Puckrin, co-founder of Coin Bureau.
By Nic Puckrin|Edited by Cheyenne Ligon
Dec 13, 2025, 4:00 p.m.
The news that MSCI — one of the world’s “Big Three” index providers — is looking to potentially exclude digital asset treasuries (DATs) from its indexes has absolutely scandalized the crypto community. JP Morgan mentioning this in their research note on Strategy only added fuel to the fire, with the term “Operation Chokepoint” coming back into the Crypto Twitter lexicon. However, MSCI may have a valid point when it comes to DATs.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the CoinDesk Headlines Newsletter today. See all newsletters
Sign me up
MSCI is one of the largest index providers in the world, with over $18 trillion in ETFs and institutional assets following its benchmarks. As such, investor protection is a key part of their role — and, indeed, they clearly and repeatedly state so in their index methodology documents. If they approve an asset for inclusion into one of their indexes, it has real clout. And, unfortunately, it is questionable whether DATs truly meet these benchmarks.
The rise and fall of DATs
Until very recently, Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) was the only Bitcoin treasury game in town. Originally a software business, Strategy (under the ticker MSTR) slowly transitioned further and further away from its core activity under the leadership of Michael Saylor to become, essentially, a leveraged BTC play listed on the traditional stock market.
And it did really well as a result. From its first Bitcoin buy in August 2020 to the peak in June 2025, MSTR’s share price soared over 3,000%. It was so successful, in fact, that many other companies decided they wanted a piece of the pie. And so, this year, the DAT trend exploded — their number increased from just 4 in 2020 to 142 by October 2025, more than half of these coming into existence this year alone. We now even have corporate entities investing in tokens like DOGE, ZEC, or WLFI, whose volatility is far greater than BTC.
But that’s not the only problem. Many of these new corporate entities raised funds to buy crypto on much more unfavorable terms than Strategy, whose unsecured convertible debt gives it a great deal of flexibility when it comes to repayments. Some others, meanwhile, have issued secured debt — meaning they face stricter collateral demands and have far less wiggle room — and on top of this, bought crypto at far higher average prices.
Max pain
As a result, DATs are now hurting from the brutal crypto sell-off over recent weeks. The crash nearly halved the combined market cap of DATs from July’s $176 billion peak to about $99 billion in mid-November, while many are now trading below their net asset values (NAVs). For investors looking to buy these stocks at this point in the market, this can potentially represent a discount — if they see future value, which is a big if. In the meantime, early investors are feeling the pain, as the stock prices of crypto treasuries tumble.
Even Strategy’s shares are down 40% year-to-date, and Tom Lee’s BitMine is trading nearly 80% down from its all-time high (though shares are up nearly 300% YTD). Saylor and Lee, however, have structured their vehicles well enough to have the luxury of buying the dip —which both of them have been doing. Others have not fared quite so well.
After their shares suffered brutal sell-offs, several DATs have already been forced to sell their crypto holdings — almost certainly at a loss — to fund share buybacks. A few weeks ago, ETH treasury firm ETHZilla sold $40 million in tokens, while FG Nexus was forced to sell over 10,922 ETH to re-purchase some 8% of its publicly tradable shares. Similarly, in early November, BTC treasury Sequans sold 970 Bitcoin to redeem half of its convertible debt. These types of forced liquidations are highly unusual for publicly traded companies, especially so soon after launch, and clearly point to structural issues.
It really feels like we’re seeing the dominoes begin to fall, and we’re not even anywhere near a crypto winter yet. For now, this is no more than a relatively standard bull market correction. So it’s particularly concerning that these companies are hurting so badly now —what will happen if we see something more akin to the 2022 downturn?
As someone who closely watches the crypto market on a daily basis, I have been concerned about the systemic risk of DATs for a while. So why shouldn’t MSCI be concerned about including these assets in its indexes? Its approval would signal that DATs are investable, well-governed, and sufficiently transparent. Conversely, excluding them suggests an unacceptable level of risk, structural issues, or concerns about liquidity or governance. It’s easy to see how many DATs fall into the latter category.
The TradFi game
Of course, not all DATs are made equal. While a large proportion of crypto companies on the market today will likely not survive a real downturn, the likes of BitMine and Strategy will almost certainly be fine. So there’s an argument that MSCI is throwing the baby out with the bathwater when it comes to these companies.
Overall, though, MSCI isn’t wrong to be cautious on DATs. Many of them are risky vehicles that have jumped on the hype train in the hopes of quick gains. Excluding them from major investment indexes isn’t the sign of some sort of coordinated attack on crypto as a whole — it's just TradFi being cautious and looking to protect investors.
And as crypto increasingly becomes integrated with the traditional financial ecosystem, this is a part of it all of us will simply have to accept. These are the growing pains that come with a major change. But in the end, these stringent standards could be a blessing in disguise. Over time, they may strengthen the case for legitimate digital asset treasuries – while weeding out the risky, badly structured firms, before they can become a systemic risk.
MSCIStrategyDigital Asset Treasury
Note: The views expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinDesk, Inc. or its owners and affiliates.
More For You
Protocol Research: GoPlus Security
Commissioned byGoPlus
What to know:
- As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
- GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
- Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.
View Full Report
More For You
Trump's National Security Strategy Ignores Bitcoin and Blockchain
The U.S. president's latest national security strategy focused on AI, biotech, and quantum computing.
What to know:
- U.S. President Donald Trump's latest national security strategy omits digital assets, focusing instead on AI, biotech, and quantum computing.
- The administration's strategic Bitcoin reserve was created using seized BTC, not new purchases.
Read full story
Latest Crypto News
Tether’s Bid to Buy Italian Soccer Club Juventus Rejected by Majority Shareholder Exor
NFT Project Pudgy Penguins Takes Over Las Vegas Sphere in Holiday Campaign
Brazil’s Largest Asset Manager Recommends Investors Put Up to 3% of their Money in Bitcoin to Hedge Against FX, Market Shocks
State of Crypto: Policymakers Dominated Most Influential 2025
Bank of Japan Set to Hike Rates to 30-Year High, Posing Another Threat to Bitcoin
Crypto’s Machine Learning ‘iPhone Moment’ Comes Closer as AI Agents Trade the Market
Top Stories
Five Crypto Firms Win Initial Approvals as Trust Banks, Including Ripple, Circle, BitGo
U.S. SEC Gives Implicit Nod for Tokenized Stocks
Ripple Payments Lands First European Bank Client in AMINA
XRP Ledger Upgrade Lays Groundwork for Lending, Tokenization Expansion
Polish Government Urges President to Sign Crypto Bill He Already Rejected: Report
From Lockstep to Lag, Bitcoin Poised to Catch Up With Small Cap Highs
Market Opportunity
Threshold Price(T)
$0.003676
$0.003676$0.003676
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
You May Also Like
The changing face of elder care in Malaysia — Sayed Mohammad Reza Yamani Sayed Umar
JULY 10 — An elderly society is becoming increasingly prevalent in Malaysia at present. It is projected that the p...
Share
Malaymail2026/07/10 15:24
Not a loophole: Singapore AI export controls let China tap US AI legally
American AI technology is reaching Chinese tech giants through a route that US export controls were never designed to close: Singapore. The city-state sits outside
Share
The Cryptonomist2026/07/10 14:46
Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders
BitcoinWorld Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders The dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, bringing forth new opportunities and innovations. A significant development is currently unfolding at Curve Finance, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX). Its founder, Michael Egorov, has put forth an exciting proposal designed to offer a more direct path for token holders to earn revenue. This initiative, centered around a new Curve Finance revenue sharing model, aims to bolster the value for those actively participating in the protocol’s governance. What is the “Yield Basis” Proposal and How Does it Work? At the core of this forward-thinking initiative is a new protocol dubbed Yield Basis. Michael Egorov introduced this concept on the CurveDAO governance forum, outlining a mechanism to distribute sustainable profits directly to CRV holders. Specifically, it targets those who stake their CRV tokens to gain veCRV, which are essential for governance participation within the Curve ecosystem. Let’s break down the initial steps of this innovative proposal: crvUSD Issuance: Before the Yield Basis protocol goes live, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued. Strategic Fund Allocation: The funds generated from the sale of these crvUSD tokens will be strategically deployed into three distinct Bitcoin-based liquidity pools: WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC. Pool Capping: To ensure balanced risk and diversified exposure, each of these pools will be capped at $10 million. This carefully designed structure aims to establish a robust and consistent income stream, forming the bedrock of a sustainable Curve Finance revenue sharing mechanism. Why is This Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Significant for CRV Holders? This proposal marks a pivotal moment for CRV holders, particularly those dedicated to the long-term health and governance of Curve Finance. Historically, generating revenue for token holders in the DeFi space can often be complex. The Yield Basis proposal simplifies this by offering a more direct and transparent pathway to earnings. By staking CRV for veCRV, holders are not merely engaging in governance; they are now directly positioned to benefit from the protocol’s overall success. The significance of this development is multifaceted: Direct Profit Distribution: veCRV holders are set to receive a substantial share of the profits generated by the Yield Basis protocol. Incentivized Governance: This direct financial incentive encourages more users to stake their CRV, which in turn strengthens the protocol’s decentralized governance structure. Enhanced Value Proposition: The promise of sustainable revenue sharing could significantly boost the inherent value of holding and staking CRV tokens. Ultimately, this move underscores Curve Finance’s dedication to rewarding its committed community and ensuring the long-term vitality of its ecosystem through effective Curve Finance revenue sharing. Understanding the Mechanics: Profit Distribution and Ecosystem Support The distribution model for Yield Basis has been thoughtfully crafted to strike a balance between rewarding veCRV holders and supporting the wider Curve ecosystem. Under the terms of the proposal, a substantial portion of the value generated by Yield Basis will flow back to those who contribute to the protocol’s governance. Returns for veCRV Holders: A significant share, specifically between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis, will be distributed to veCRV holders. This flexible range allows for dynamic adjustments based on market conditions and the protocol’s performance. Ecosystem Reserve: Crucially, 25% of the Yield Basis tokens will be reserved exclusively for the Curve ecosystem. This allocation can be utilized for various strategic purposes, such as funding ongoing development, issuing grants, or further incentivizing liquidity providers. This ensures the continuous growth and innovation of the platform. The proposal is currently undergoing a democratic vote on the CurveDAO governance forum, giving the community a direct voice in shaping the future of Curve Finance revenue sharing. The voting period is scheduled to conclude on September 24th. What’s Next for Curve Finance and CRV Holders? The proposed Yield Basis protocol represents a pioneering approach to sustainable revenue generation and community incentivization within the DeFi landscape. If approved by the community, this Curve Finance revenue sharing model has the potential to establish a new benchmark for how decentralized exchanges reward their most dedicated participants. It aims to foster a more robust and engaged community by directly linking governance participation with tangible financial benefits. This strategic move by Michael Egorov and the Curve Finance team highlights a strong commitment to innovation and strengthening the decentralized nature of the protocol. For CRV holders, a thorough understanding of this proposal is crucial for making informed decisions regarding their staking strategies and overall engagement with one of DeFi’s foundational platforms. FAQs about Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Q1: What is the main goal of the Yield Basis proposal? A1: The primary goal is to establish a more direct and sustainable way for CRV token holders who stake their tokens (receiving veCRV) to earn revenue from the Curve Finance protocol. Q2: How will funds be generated for the Yield Basis protocol? A2: Initially, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued and sold. The funds from this sale will then be allocated to three Bitcoin-based pools (WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC), with each pool capped at $10 million, to generate profits. Q3: Who benefits from the Yield Basis revenue sharing? A3: The proposal states that between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis will be returned to veCRV holders, who are CRV stakers participating in governance. Q4: What is the purpose of the 25% reserve for the Curve ecosystem? A4: This 25% reserve of Yield Basis tokens is intended to support the broader Curve ecosystem, potentially funding development, grants, or other initiatives that contribute to the platform’s growth and sustainability. Q5: When is the vote on the Yield Basis proposal? A5: A vote on the proposal is currently underway on the CurveDAO governance forum and is scheduled to run until September 24th. If you found this article insightful and valuable, please consider sharing it with your friends, colleagues, and followers on social media! Your support helps us continue to deliver important DeFi insights and analysis to a wider audience. To learn more about the latest DeFi market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized finance institutional adoption. This post Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:35
