THE SENATE and House of Representatives canceled Monday’s scheduled bicameral conference committee meeting after lawmakers deadlocked over whether to restore fundingTHE SENATE and House of Representatives canceled Monday’s scheduled bicameral conference committee meeting after lawmakers deadlocked over whether to restore funding

Bicameral budget talks hit deadlock on DPWH funding

THE SENATE and House of Representatives canceled Monday’s scheduled bicameral conference committee meeting after lawmakers deadlocked over whether to restore funding for the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) in the proposed P6.793-trillion national budget for 2026, amid lingering concerns over corruption in flood control projects.

Senator Sherwin T. Gatchalian, chairman of the Senate Finance committee, described the issue as “deadlocked” but said the chamber remains open to compromise.

“The House had a different opinion. We had a different opinion,” he told reporters, adding that the Senate is reviewing DPWH Secretary Vivencio B. Dizon’s appeal to reverse a P45-billion cut in the agency’s proposed budget. “This is a very technical issue, and it will take time to talk with DPWH.”

Nueva Ecija Rep. Mikaela Angela B. Suansing, who heads the House Appropriations Committee, said no new bicameral meeting had been scheduled, urging lawmakers to act quickly to avoid a reenacted budget for 2026.

She warned that roughly 9,900 infrastructure projects totaling P406 billion could be affected if the cut is retained. “If we assume that 25% of these projects will become unimplementable, that’s already P101 billion wasted,” she said.

The dispute centers on DPWH’s allocation in next year’s spending plan. The Senate trimmed the agency’s budget to P570.8 billion, roughly 8.6% lower than the House’s P624.48 billion, citing concerns over overpriced materials and procurement irregularities.

Earlier, both chambers reduced P255 billion earmarked for flood control projects from the Executive’s proposed P880 billion infrastructure program, following allegations of anomalies in project implementation.

Senators have indicated they are firm on maintaining cuts linked to overpriced construction materials. “The Senate is very firm that it doesn’t want overpriced materials,” Mr. Gatchalian said, citing the need for transparency and fiscal accountability.

Meanwhile, the Marcos administration signaled support for restoring the funds. Palace Press Officer Clarissa A. Castro said President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. is aware of Mr. Dizon’s appeal and stressed the importance of DPWH spending in driving economic growth.

“So, the wish is for [the Senate cut] not to be granted. Nearly 10,000 projects will not be implemented if the budget requested by DPWH is further cut,” she separately told a news briefing.

Mr. Dizon said the P45-billion restoration would not fund flood control projects implicated in corruption but would support roads, bridges and other infrastructure critical to accelerating economic activity.

“In the past quarter, the economy only grew by 4%,” he said during a Sunday briefing with the bicameral panel. “This is largely because of the cut in public expenditure, especially in infrastructure.”

The deadlock comes as Congress races to reconcile its budget differences before the Dec. 22 deadline, which is crucial to prevent a reenacted 2025 spending plan.

Both chambers have emphasized that technical deliberations are still ongoing, with Ms. Suansing noting that “every single day is crucial for our technical teams to be able to finish the bill.”

The P6.793-trillion national budget, the largest in Philippine history, reflects the administration’s focus on infrastructure as a key pillar of its economic strategy, balancing fiscal prudence with the need to sustain development projects.

Both chambers have stressed the need to ensure transparency, proper cost control and accountability in project execution. The outcome of these deliberations will determine whether almost 10,000 projects — including bridges, highways and flood mitigation works — can proceed without delay.

The bicameral conference committee is expected to complete deliberations in the coming days, with President Marcos aiming to sign the final spending plan by Dec. 29. — Kenneth Christiane L. Basilio and Chloe Mari A. Hufana

Market Opportunity
Housecoin Logo
Housecoin Price(HOUSE)
$0.001976
$0.001976$0.001976
-0.10%
USD
Housecoin (HOUSE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
The aftermath of the energy war: As Microsoft, BlackRock monopolize infrastructure, Eden Miner becomes retail’s last backdoor to the “hashrate yield network”

The aftermath of the energy war: As Microsoft, BlackRock monopolize infrastructure, Eden Miner becomes retail’s last backdoor to the “hashrate yield network”

As mining goes institutional in 2025, Eden Miner opens retail access to hashrate investing through a new model. The year 2025 marks a watershed moment for global
Share
Crypto.news2025/12/17 00:08
Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

As Bitcoin encounters a "value winter", real-world gold is recasting the iron curtain of value on the blockchain.
Share
PANews2025/04/14 17:12