Als je Bitcoin in de gaten houdt, kom je eens in de zoveel tijd hetzelfde verhaal tegen, namleijk dat Bitcoin “naar nul kan” door quantum computers. Volgens sommigeAls je Bitcoin in de gaten houdt, kom je eens in de zoveel tijd hetzelfde verhaal tegen, namleijk dat Bitcoin “naar nul kan” door quantum computers. Volgens sommige
Hoe gevaarlijk is quantum nu daadwerkelijk voor Bitcoin?
Als je Bitcoin in de gaten houdt, kom je eens in de zoveel tijd hetzelfde verhaal tegen, namleijk dat Bitcoin “naar nul kan” door quantum computers. Volgens sommige analisten is het slechts een kwestie van tijd voordat een superkrachtige quantumcomputer de beveiliging van Bitcoin breekt, private keys blootlegt en het vertrouwen in het netwerk vernietigt. Maar hoe reëel is dat scenario eigenlijk? Check onze Discord Connect met "like-minded" crypto enthousiastelingen Leer gratis de basis van Bitcoin & trading - stap voor stap, zonder voorkennis. Krijg duidelijke uitleg & charts van ervaren analisten. Sluit je aan bij een community die samen groeit. Nu naar Discord Bitcoin draait om signatures, niet om encryptie Volgens Adam Back, CEO van Blockstream en een van de meest gerespecteerde cryptografen binnen de Bitcoin wereld, is de angst rond quantum computing op dit moment sterk overdreven. De zorgen zijn gebaseerd op een fundamenteel misverstand over hoe Bitcoin technisch is beveiligd. Een belangrijk punt dat vaak verkeerd wordt begrepen: Bitcoin gebruikt geen encryptie om coins “op te sluiten”. Het netwerk vertrouwt op digital signatures. Elke Bitcoin wallet werkt met een private key en een public key. De private key gebruik je om transacties te ondertekenen, terwijl de public key wordt gebruikt om te controleren of jij daadwerkelijk de eigenaar bent. De private key zelf wordt nooit gedeeld of “decrypted”. Dit is iets heel anders dan klassieke encryptie, waarbij data wordt versleuteld en later weer ontsleuteld. Bitcoin bewijst eigendom zonder de geheime sleutel bloot te leggen. Dat onderscheid is belangrijk in de discussie over de dreiging van quantum. Waar komt de angst dan vandaan? De kern van de angst draait om Shor’s algoritme, een quantum algoritme dat in theorie bepaalde cryptografische problemen veel sneller kan oplossen dan klassieke computers. In een extreem toekomstscenario zou zo’n algoritme private keys kunnen afleiden uit public keys. Sommige analisten denken dat early Bitcoin wallets, waaronder mogelijk die van Satoshi Nakamoto, hierdoor kwetsbaar zouden zijn. Als die coins plotseling verplaatst worden, zou dat volgens hen een vertrouwenscrisis veroorzaken. Maar hier zit een belangrijke nuance. Nieuwe cryptomuntenKom als eerste te weten wat de nieuwste cryptomunten van dit moment zijn! Elke crypto investeerder is er naar op zoek: een nieuwe crypto met groot groeipotentieel. De Federal Reserve heeft de rentes zoals verwacht verlaagd, en dus ontstaan er nieuwe kansen op de cryptomarkt. Experts zien kansen in altcoins als Polygon en Bitcoin Hyper. In dit artikel zetten we de beste munten op een rij die in… Continue reading Hoe gevaarlijk is quantum nu daadwerkelijk voor Bitcoin? document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { var screenWidth = window.innerWidth; var excerpts = document.querySelectorAll('.lees-ook-description'); excerpts.forEach(function(description) { var excerpt = description.getAttribute('data-description'); var wordLimit = screenWidth wordLimit) { var trimmedDescription = excerpt.split(' ').slice(0, wordLimit).join(' ') + '...'; description.textContent = trimmedDescription; } }); }); Public keys zijn meestal niet zichtbaar Bij Bitcoin wordt een public key pas zichtbaar op het moment dat een adres een transactie verstuurt. Veel oude wallets, waaronder vroege adressen die nooit zijn gebruikt, hebben hun public key dus nog nooit weggegeven. Zonder zichtbare public key valt er niets af te leiden, ook niet met een quantum computer. Dat betekent dat een groot deel van de zogenoemde “kwetsbare” coins in de praktijk niet eens aan te vallen is. Hoe ver is quantum technologie echt? Hoewel quantum computing snel vooruitgaat, zijn we technisch gezien nog ver verwijderd van een machine die Bitcoin daadwerkelijk kan bedreigen. Huidige quantum computers hebben inderdaad steeds meer qubits, maar missen de foutcorrectie en stabiliteit die nodig zijn om Shor’s algoritme op schaal uit te voeren. Vitalik Buterin, oprichter van Ethereum, erkent dat de dreiging op lange termijn reëel is en meetbaar blijft. Solana oprichter Anatoly Yakovenko schat zelfs dat er binnen 5 jaar een serieuze kans bestaat op voldoende quantum kracht. Adam Back is daar een stuk nuchterder over en spreekt over een tijdshorizon van 20 tot 40 jaar, als het überhaupt ooit zover komt. Bitcoin kan zich aanpassen Wat vaak wordt vergeten in deze discussie: Bitcoin is geen statisch systeem. Het protocol kan worden geüpdatet. Post-quantum cryptografie bestaat vandaag al. Mocht quantum computing ooit een echte dreiging worden, dan kan Bitcoin overstappen op nieuwe signature scheme die bestand is tegen quantum attacks. Dat zou via een netwerk upgrade verlopen, net zoals eerdere technische verbeteringen in het verleden. Daarbij komt dat een quantum dreiging niet uniek is voor Bitcoin. Banken, overheden, internetbeveiliging en vrijwel alle digitale infrastructuur gebruiken vergelijkbare cryptografie. Als quantum computers echt doorbreken, zal de hele digitale wereld tegelijk moeten migreren, niet alleen crypto. Best wallet - betrouwbare en anonieme wallet Best wallet - betrouwbare en anonieme wallet Meer dan 60 chains beschikbaar voor alle crypto Vroege toegang tot nieuwe projecten Hoge staking belongingen Lage transactiekosten Best wallet review Koop nu via Best Wallet Let op: cryptocurrency is een zeer volatiele en ongereguleerde investering. Doe je eigen onderzoek.
Het bericht Hoe gevaarlijk is quantum nu daadwerkelijk voor Bitcoin? is geschreven door Gijs Smit en verscheen als eerst op Bitcoinmagazine.nl.
Market Opportunity
QUANTUM Price(QUANTUM)
$0.003311
$0.003311$0.003311
USD
QUANTUM (QUANTUM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
You May Also Like
Ultimea Unveils Skywave X100 Dual: 9.2.6 Wireless Home Theater Launching March 2026
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, Calif., Feb. 12, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Ultimea, a leader in immersive home entertainment, announces the upcoming launch of its next-generation flagship
Share
AI Journal2026/02/13 02:45
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be
The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders
BitcoinWorld Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders The dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, bringing forth new opportunities and innovations. A significant development is currently unfolding at Curve Finance, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX). Its founder, Michael Egorov, has put forth an exciting proposal designed to offer a more direct path for token holders to earn revenue. This initiative, centered around a new Curve Finance revenue sharing model, aims to bolster the value for those actively participating in the protocol’s governance. What is the “Yield Basis” Proposal and How Does it Work? At the core of this forward-thinking initiative is a new protocol dubbed Yield Basis. Michael Egorov introduced this concept on the CurveDAO governance forum, outlining a mechanism to distribute sustainable profits directly to CRV holders. Specifically, it targets those who stake their CRV tokens to gain veCRV, which are essential for governance participation within the Curve ecosystem. Let’s break down the initial steps of this innovative proposal: crvUSD Issuance: Before the Yield Basis protocol goes live, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued. Strategic Fund Allocation: The funds generated from the sale of these crvUSD tokens will be strategically deployed into three distinct Bitcoin-based liquidity pools: WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC. Pool Capping: To ensure balanced risk and diversified exposure, each of these pools will be capped at $10 million. This carefully designed structure aims to establish a robust and consistent income stream, forming the bedrock of a sustainable Curve Finance revenue sharing mechanism. Why is This Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Significant for CRV Holders? This proposal marks a pivotal moment for CRV holders, particularly those dedicated to the long-term health and governance of Curve Finance. Historically, generating revenue for token holders in the DeFi space can often be complex. The Yield Basis proposal simplifies this by offering a more direct and transparent pathway to earnings. By staking CRV for veCRV, holders are not merely engaging in governance; they are now directly positioned to benefit from the protocol’s overall success. The significance of this development is multifaceted: Direct Profit Distribution: veCRV holders are set to receive a substantial share of the profits generated by the Yield Basis protocol. Incentivized Governance: This direct financial incentive encourages more users to stake their CRV, which in turn strengthens the protocol’s decentralized governance structure. Enhanced Value Proposition: The promise of sustainable revenue sharing could significantly boost the inherent value of holding and staking CRV tokens. Ultimately, this move underscores Curve Finance’s dedication to rewarding its committed community and ensuring the long-term vitality of its ecosystem through effective Curve Finance revenue sharing. Understanding the Mechanics: Profit Distribution and Ecosystem Support The distribution model for Yield Basis has been thoughtfully crafted to strike a balance between rewarding veCRV holders and supporting the wider Curve ecosystem. Under the terms of the proposal, a substantial portion of the value generated by Yield Basis will flow back to those who contribute to the protocol’s governance. Returns for veCRV Holders: A significant share, specifically between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis, will be distributed to veCRV holders. This flexible range allows for dynamic adjustments based on market conditions and the protocol’s performance. Ecosystem Reserve: Crucially, 25% of the Yield Basis tokens will be reserved exclusively for the Curve ecosystem. This allocation can be utilized for various strategic purposes, such as funding ongoing development, issuing grants, or further incentivizing liquidity providers. This ensures the continuous growth and innovation of the platform. The proposal is currently undergoing a democratic vote on the CurveDAO governance forum, giving the community a direct voice in shaping the future of Curve Finance revenue sharing. The voting period is scheduled to conclude on September 24th. What’s Next for Curve Finance and CRV Holders? The proposed Yield Basis protocol represents a pioneering approach to sustainable revenue generation and community incentivization within the DeFi landscape. If approved by the community, this Curve Finance revenue sharing model has the potential to establish a new benchmark for how decentralized exchanges reward their most dedicated participants. It aims to foster a more robust and engaged community by directly linking governance participation with tangible financial benefits. This strategic move by Michael Egorov and the Curve Finance team highlights a strong commitment to innovation and strengthening the decentralized nature of the protocol. For CRV holders, a thorough understanding of this proposal is crucial for making informed decisions regarding their staking strategies and overall engagement with one of DeFi’s foundational platforms. FAQs about Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Q1: What is the main goal of the Yield Basis proposal? A1: The primary goal is to establish a more direct and sustainable way for CRV token holders who stake their tokens (receiving veCRV) to earn revenue from the Curve Finance protocol. Q2: How will funds be generated for the Yield Basis protocol? A2: Initially, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued and sold. The funds from this sale will then be allocated to three Bitcoin-based pools (WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC), with each pool capped at $10 million, to generate profits. Q3: Who benefits from the Yield Basis revenue sharing? A3: The proposal states that between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis will be returned to veCRV holders, who are CRV stakers participating in governance. Q4: What is the purpose of the 25% reserve for the Curve ecosystem? A4: This 25% reserve of Yield Basis tokens is intended to support the broader Curve ecosystem, potentially funding development, grants, or other initiatives that contribute to the platform’s growth and sustainability. Q5: When is the vote on the Yield Basis proposal? A5: A vote on the proposal is currently underway on the CurveDAO governance forum and is scheduled to run until September 24th. If you found this article insightful and valuable, please consider sharing it with your friends, colleagues, and followers on social media! Your support helps us continue to deliver important DeFi insights and analysis to a wider audience. To learn more about the latest DeFi market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized finance institutional adoption. This post Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:35