TLDR XRP spot ETFs recorded 32 consecutive days of inflows, reaching $1.14 billion AUM. Grayscale’s GXRP led daily inflows with $10.14 million added on DecemberTLDR XRP spot ETFs recorded 32 consecutive days of inflows, reaching $1.14 billion AUM. Grayscale’s GXRP led daily inflows with $10.14 million added on December

XRP Spot ETFs Hit $1.14 Billion AUM After 32 Consecutive Days of Inflows

TLDR

  • XRP spot ETFs recorded 32 consecutive days of inflows, reaching $1.14 billion AUM.
  • Grayscale’s GXRP led daily inflows with $10.14 million added on December 18.
  • Cumulative net inflows across all XRP ETFs now exceed $1.06 billion.
  • XRP traded near $1.90 despite continued institutional buying through ETFs.

According to SoSoValue data, XRP spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the United States have had a 32-day streak of daily net inflows. These ETFs received new capital of $30.41 million on December 18, and cumulative inflows have now exceeded $1.06 billion. The assets under management (AUM) in all XRP spot ETFs have reached $1.14 billion.

GXRP by Grayscale was the most significant inflow of the day, attracting $10.14 million. The cumulative net inflows of the fund are now $233.18 million, followed by 21Shares with $9.73 million, bringing its total to $15.4 million. The inflow was also achieved through Franklin XRPZ and Bitwise XRP products, where there is consistent interest from several issuers. The steady inflows suggest that demand was institutional, despite the XRP spot price’s inability to extend its gains over the past few weeks.

Although ETFs are in high demand, the XRP market price traded at nearly $1.90 by the close of December 18, representing a multi-week decline. The lack of correlation between price performance and capital inflows indicates accumulation activity rather than short-term speculation. Institutional investors are gradually increasing their exposure, with no direct impact on the price.

ETF Inflows Remain Broad Across Issuers

ETF participation continues to exhibit a balanced distribution of inflows, rather than concentrating in a single fund. Canary’s XRPC remains the largest XRP ETF by net assets at $316.15 million, although it saw no inflows on December 18. Bitwise’s product added $3.65 million, while Franklin’s XRPZ brought in $6.89 million during the same period.

Price declines across the ETF products ranged from -3.9% to -4.1%, which aligned with XRP’s broader market move rather than fund-specific issues. Trading volumes remained stable, with a total volume of $64.28 million reached on December 18. This suggests that market liquidity has not weakened, even with price pressure.

The diversity in issuer participation may indicate reduced risk from overreliance on a single fund. Multiple asset managers receiving consistent inflows points to a broader institutional interest in XRP exposure through regulated products.

Market Outlook Reflects Accumulation Trend

The ongoing divergence between XRP ETF inflows and spot price continues to raise attention. Institutions often enter positions slowly, particularly during periods of price weakness. The 32-day streak of inflows may reflect strategic positioning rather than reactive buying.

While short-term price action remains uncertain, the steady capital flow suggests long-term confidence. If sell pressure in spot markets slows, ETF inflows could stabilize price movement. Until then, inflows provide a signal of interest that has yet to translate into upward momentum.

The post XRP Spot ETFs Hit $1.14 Billion AUM After 32 Consecutive Days of Inflows appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
XRP Logo
XRP Price(XRP)
$1,936
$1,936$1,936
+0,75%
USD
XRP (XRP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

The post U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The United States is contending with the intricacies of cryptocurrency regulation as newly enacted legislation stirs debate over centralized versus decentralized finance. The recent passage of the GENIUS Act under Bo Hines’ leadership is perceived to skew favor towards centralized entities, potentially disadvantaging decentralized innovations. Continue Reading:U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/u-s-moves-grip-on-crypto-regulation-intensifies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:09
Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58