THE SECURITIES and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) push for mandatory environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures aligned with international standards couldTHE SECURITIES and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) push for mandatory environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures aligned with international standards could

Mandatory ESG disclosure seen to raise credibility; foreign investor impact minimal

By Alexandria Grace C. Magno

THE SECURITIES and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) push for mandatory environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures aligned with international standards could enhance credibility and modest trading for some companies, while broader governance and external risks may limit changes in foreign investment, analysts said.

“The reporting alignment to international standards could bring select companies an extra layer of credibility that could have been initially overlooked by ESG investors,” AP Securities, Inc. Equity Research Analyst Shawn Ray R. Atienza said in a Viber message.

He noted that companies achieving compliance may experience a modest uptick in trading volume once the changes take effect.

However, the true outcome is unclear, according to Mr. Atienza, since foreign investors could be focused on broader issues fueling recent repatriation of funds.

“At best, we see minimal to no material change on foreign investors’ perception,” he said.

Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. (RCBC) Chief Economist Michael L. Ricafort said the commission’s move would increase transparency for local listed companies and “further uphold the best interest of the investing public.”

He noted that if anti-corruption measures, reforms, and policy priorities for improving governance standards are taken seriously, this could be the missing link to boosting investor confidence in the economy and financial markets and potentially alter foreign investors’ views of Philippine Stock Exchange index (PSEi) companies.

The commission has issued a memorandum adopting the Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRS) on sustainability disclosures, setting clear guidelines to help covered companies prepare and submit sustainability reports in line with international standards.

Memorandum Circular (MC) No. 16, Series of 2025, implements PFRS S1, which sets general requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information, and PFRS S2, which covers climate-related disclosures, repealing the Commission’s MC No. 4, Series of 2019, which had required only publicly listed companies (PLCs) to submit sustainability reports.

“The adoption of the PFRS on sustainability disclosures underscores our commitment to high-quality, comparable, and globally aligned sustainability reporting,” SEC Chairman Francisco Ed. Lim said in a statement on Friday.

“By elevating the standards of sustainability reporting in the Philippines, we hope to enable more companies and stakeholders to better understand the financial impacts of sustainability-related risks and opportunities, supporting long-term value creation and improved capital allocation decisions,” he added.

Under the memorandum circular, PLCs and large non-listed companies (LNLs) under Section 17.2 of Republic Act No. 8799 must attach board-approved sustainability reports to their annual reports, while other LNLs submit them with audited financial statements.

Adoption of PFRS S1 and S2 will be phased in starting fiscal year 2026. Tier 1 PLCs with market capitalization over P50 billion as of Dec. 31, or listing date thereafter, must start PFRS-based sustainability reporting in 2027 for fiscal year 2026.

Tier 2 PLCs with market capitalization from over P3 billion to P50 billion as of Dec. 31, or listing date thereafter, adopt PFRS in 2028 for fiscal years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2027.

Tier 3 includes PSE-listed PLCs with market capitalization of P3 billion or less, PLCs with debt-only listings on the Philippine Dealing & Exchange Corp., and LNLs with over P15 billion in prior fiscal year revenue from ordinary activities, consolidated for parent companies, which will adopt PFRS in 2028 for fiscal years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2028.

Covered companies may also use other recognized international frameworks alongside PFRS S1 and S2, provided they do not conflict with these standards, obscure material information, and are properly disclosed.

“They also implement a mandatory limited assurance on Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by an independent assurance practitioner two years after the implementation of PFRS S1 and S2 for each tier, in line with the International Standard on Sustainability Assurance (ISSA) 5000, to ensure a consistent and high-quality sustainability assurance engagement,” the commission said.

To ease compliance, the SEC issued transitional reliefs through the memorandum circular.

“MC 4 remains in force until a PLC reaches its adoption year, while companies may continue using any recognized framework for their submission of sustainability reports for fiscal year 2025,” it said.

Tier 1 and 2 companies have one year to disclose climate-related risks and opportunities, while Tier 3 companies have two years.

“All covered corporations will be given one year to submit their sustainability report after the publication of their related financial statements, at the same time as their next second-quarter or half-year interim financial statements, or within nine months from the end of the reporting period, if there are no interim financial statements issued,” the SEC added.

“All tiers will also not be required to disclose comparative information and will be allowed to use methods other than the GHG Protocol: a corporate accounting and reporting standard for one year. Covered corporations will not be required to submit Scope 3 GHG emissions for two years.”

Market Opportunity
EPNS Logo
EPNS Price(PUSH)
$0.01551
$0.01551$0.01551
-0.19%
USD
EPNS (PUSH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX presale hits $7.5M with tokens at $0.024 and 30% bonus code BLOCK30, while Solana holds $243 and Avalanche builds a $1B treasury to attract institutions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
XRP Price Prediction: XRP to Soar as This Top Crypto Under $0.05 Eyes 5000% Rally

XRP Price Prediction: XRP to Soar as This Top Crypto Under $0.05 Eyes 5000% Rally

While the sentiment grows with regard to a possible positive breakout in the XRP pricing, expert investors continue to turn their attention to the best cryptocurrency
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/12/29 01:30