TLDR XRP traders are divided over whether XRP ETFs are causing a supply shortage on exchanges. A viral post claimed that only 1.5 billion XRP remains on exchangesTLDR XRP traders are divided over whether XRP ETFs are causing a supply shortage on exchanges. A viral post claimed that only 1.5 billion XRP remains on exchanges

XRP ETF Liquidity Fears Questioned Amid 16B XRP on CEX Balances

TLDR

  • XRP traders are divided over whether XRP ETFs are causing a supply shortage on exchanges.
  • A viral post claimed that only 1.5 billion XRP remains on exchanges due to recent ETF activity.
  • Validator Vet responded by stating that 16 billion XRP is still held across major centralized exchanges.
  • Vet explained that XRP supply is dynamic because tokens can move to exchanges within seconds.
  • Some traders believe escrow rules and institutional custody could reduce effective XRP supply.

A growing divide has emerged among XRP traders over the impact of XRP ETF activity on exchange liquidity. Some traders argue supply is tightening, while others present higher exchange-held XRP figures. Disagreements center on the accuracy of on-chain data and potential effects on market price.

XRP ETF Supply Concerns Trigger Disputes

A post on X dated Dec. 27 claimed only 1.5 billion XRP remain on exchanges. The account unknowDLT linked this to XRP ETF inflows and warned of a possible “supply shock.” It estimated that around 750 million XRP had moved off exchanges in recent weeks.

The post projected a liquidity crunch by 2026 under the proposed “Clarity Act” legislation. This claim quickly circulated across XRP trading communities, triggering heated reactions. Some traders began speculating about XRP ETF-driven market effects.

However, not all participants agreed with the forecast. A validator on XRP Ledger, named Vet, responded with counter data. Vet said exchanges hold nearly 16 billion XRP, far higher than the viral claim.

Validators Defend High Liquidity Data

Vet published updated figures on Dec. 28 disputing the 1.5 billion XRP claim. “Markets are too dynamic to statically plot movements,” the validator stated in their post. They emphasized the fluid nature of XRP supply due to fast token transfers.

According to Vet, XRP holders can move funds to exchanges in three to four seconds. They argued this makes the market less vulnerable to long-term imbalances. Vet described the viral post’s projection as misleading.

They also highlighted differences in wallet tracking methodology. Vet shared that Upbit alone holds around 2 billion XRP across four known wallets. However, they said those represent only part of the actual holdings.

Traders Debate Custody and Escrow Mechanics

Trader Dman argued the effective circulating supply could tighten from escrow and custody rules. They suggested XRP ETF accumulation is happening in dedicated wallets. Dman said these holdings now account for around 1% of total XRP supply.

They further stated that Ripple’s monthly escrow releases could impact available liquidity. This could slowly reduce tradeable XRP over time. Some interpreted this as indirect support for the supply shock idea.

In response, Vet acknowledged Ripple facilitates ETF transfers but rejected panic-based conclusions. They reiterated that steady buying does not constitute a true supply crisis. Vet asserted only immediate allocation shifts would create shocks.

On-Chain Metrics Continue Fueling Debate

Validator Vet confirmed that XRP ETF activity is reflected in Ripple reports. However, they insisted billions of XRP remain available in Ripple operational wallets. These reserves could cover surging demand if needed.

Critics still question whether exchange-held balances are overstated due to wallet misclassification. Commentator Zach Rector voiced doubts over the accuracy of some exchange balance figures. Vet maintained the shared data was conservative.

As the debate grows, traders continue monitoring XRP ETF flows and wallet data. The XRP Ledger’s open nature allows real-time analysis of large transfers. Market watchers remain divided on the outcome.

The argument underscores the difficulty of interpreting dynamic on-chain activity. Different methods produce vastly different views of available XRP. This has created friction across the trading community.

The post XRP ETF Liquidity Fears Questioned Amid 16B XRP on CEX Balances appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
XRP Logo
XRP Price(XRP)
$1.8539
$1.8539$1.8539
-0.62%
USD
XRP (XRP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50
South Korean Court Sentences Crypto Exchange Employee for Espionage

South Korean Court Sentences Crypto Exchange Employee for Espionage

The post South Korean Court Sentences Crypto Exchange Employee for Espionage appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Employee sentenced for espionage involving
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/30 04:09