The post BlackRock Transfers Bitcoin Amid ETF Outflows as MicroStrategy Buys More BTC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BlackRock transferred $214 million inThe post BlackRock Transfers Bitcoin Amid ETF Outflows as MicroStrategy Buys More BTC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BlackRock transferred $214 million in

BlackRock Transfers Bitcoin Amid ETF Outflows as MicroStrategy Buys More BTC

  • BlackRock’s transfers prepare for ETF investor redemptions as IBIT loses $7.9M and ETHA $13.3M in a single day.

  • Arkham data reveals $214M BTC and ETH moved to Coinbase Prime in year-end transactions.

  • U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $19.3M outflows collectively, with Ethereum ETFs under similar pressure, per on-chain analytics.

BlackRock Bitcoin Ethereum transfers: $214M moved to Coinbase Prime amid ETF outflows. Learn how Strategy countered with a $108M BTC buy. Key insights on liquidity shifts and market strategies.

What are BlackRock’s Bitcoin and Ethereum transfers to Coinbase Prime?

BlackRock Bitcoin Ethereum transfers involved shifting $214 million worth of BTC and ETH to Coinbase Prime through multiple year-end transactions, as reported by on-chain intelligence firm Arkham. This move supports liquidity management for its spot ETFs amid investor redemptions. The activity highlights BlackRock’s transition from passive holding to proactive operations in response to market dynamics.

Why are BlackRock’s crypto ETFs experiencing outflows?

BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) recorded steady outflows since December 18, including $7.9 million on December 29 alone. Ethereum-focused ETHA saw $13.3 million exit that day, nearly matching the total net outflow across all U.S. Ethereum ETFs. Institutional investors likely engaged in year-end tax-loss harvesting and profit-taking after a turbulent quarter. On-chain data from Arkham confirms these pressures prompted the transfers. Broader U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs faced $19.3 million in withdrawals on the same date, underscoring industry-wide caution. Financial analysts note this aligns with historical patterns of portfolio rebalancing at quarter-ends. BlackRock’s response demonstrates robust risk management, positioning its ETFs to handle volatility effectively.

Frequently Asked Questions

What prompted BlackRock’s $214 million Bitcoin Ethereum transfers to Coinbase amid ETF outflows?

BlackRock executed the transfers to facilitate liquidity for redeeming ETF shares as investor interest waned. Data from Arkham shows the moves aligned with $7.9 million IBIT outflows and $13.3 million ETHA losses on December 29. This proactive step ensures smooth operations despite year-end pressures like tax strategies.

How did Strategy respond to BlackRock’s ETF challenges?

On the same day BlackRock faced redemptions, Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy, purchased 1,229 BTC for $108.85 million at an average price of $88,568 per Bitcoin. This boosted holdings to 672,497 BTC with $8.31 billion in unrealized profits, showcasing long-term commitment as reported by Lookonchain.

Key Takeaways

  • Active Liquidity Management: BlackRock’s $214 million transfers to Coinbase Prime address ETF outflows, evolving from holder to facilitator.
  • Contrasting Strategies: While BlackRock enables exits, Strategy’s $108 million BTC acquisition removes supply, highlighting divergent institutional approaches.
  • Market Stability: Bitcoin at $87,900 and Ethereum at $2,974 show minimal price reaction, indicating anticipated end-of-year flows.

Conclusion

BlackRock’s Bitcoin Ethereum transfers reflect adaptive strategies amid crypto ETF outflows, contrasting sharply with Strategy’s aggressive accumulation. As tracked by Arkham and Lookonchain, these moves underscore institutional repositioning. Investors should monitor January inflows for shifting sentiment, positioning portfolios for potential 2025 recoveries through diversified exposure.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/blackrock-transfers-bitcoin-amid-etf-outflows-as-microstrategy-buys-more-btc

Market Opportunity
Moonveil Logo
Moonveil Price(MORE)
$0.002791
$0.002791$0.002791
+0.17%
USD
Moonveil (MORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

TLDR: Alpenglow reduces Solana finality from 12.8 seconds to 100-150 milliseconds, a 100-fold improvement. Votor enables one or two-round block finalization through
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/03 02:29
Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

As Bitcoin encounters a "value winter", real-world gold is recasting the iron curtain of value on the blockchain.
Share
PANews2025/04/14 17:12