Meta has confirmed that it’s acquiring Manus, a Singapore-based AI start-up, in a deal valued at more than… The post Meta’s $2bn bet on Manus AI may improve WhatsAppMeta has confirmed that it’s acquiring Manus, a Singapore-based AI start-up, in a deal valued at more than… The post Meta’s $2bn bet on Manus AI may improve WhatsApp

Meta’s $2bn bet on Manus AI may improve WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram experience

Meta has confirmed that it’s acquiring Manus, a Singapore-based AI start-up, in a deal valued at more than $2 billion. The deal is not simply another AI investment or talent grab but signals a deeper shift in how Meta sees the future of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp.

The company is betting that the next evolution of social platforms will be defined less by conversation and content and more by action.

The spokesperson for Meta, in a statement, said, “Meta’s acquisition of Manus AI will enable us to provide the most advanced technology to our users with safeguards in place to eliminate areas of potential risk.

There will be no continuing Chinese ownership interests in Manus AI following the transaction, and Manus AI will discontinue its services and operations in China.”

Manus has risen quickly by positioning itself at the frontiers of what the industry now calls “agentic AI”. Founded by Chinese entrepreneurs and initially developed in Shenzhen before relocating to Singapore, the company launched its first general-purpose AI agent earlier this year. Its system is designed to plan and execute complex tasks autonomously, rather than respond passively to prompts. That distinction is crucial.

How Meta’s $2 billion bet on Chinese Manus AI would improve WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram experience 

Most large language models, including Meta’s own Llama family, excel at generating text, images or code snippets. They wait for instructions and answer in stages. Manus, by contrast, functions as an execution layer. Its architecture coordinates multiple specialised sub-agents that can browse the web, analyse data, write and run code, and manage multi-step workflows with limited human intervention.

By acquiring Manus, Meta is moving decisively from AI that talks to AI that does things.

What Meta’s acquisition of Manus means

Nowhere is this shift likely to be more transformative than on WhatsApp. Meta has long harboured ambitions of turning the messaging platform into a super-app, particularly in markets where WhatsApp already underpins commerce and customer service for millions of small businesses. Earlier bot-based efforts struggled with rigidity and poor user experience.

Agentic AI changes that equation. Manus-powered assistants could summarise sprawling group chats, draft replies that reflect a user’s tone, and turn scattered messages into structured schedules or task lists. 

For businesses, the implications are more significant. Autonomous agents could manage customer enquiries, book appointments, update simple inventory records and generate reports directly within chats. For many small firms, this would amount to enterprise-grade automation without enterprise budgets.

Similarly, Instagram is another natural beneficiary. The platform’s creator economy, which already relies heavily on analytics and automation, could be reshaped by AI agents that operate as creative co-pilots. 

How Meta’s $2 billion bet on Chinese Manus AI would improve WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram experience 

Rather than simply enhancing images or suggesting captions, Manus agents could analyse engagement trends, recommend posting schedules, draft SEO-aware captions and generate variations of Reels from raw footage. Influencers and brand managers would move away from manual optimisation towards higher-level creative and strategic oversight.

On Facebook, the opportunity lies in reducing friction and information overload. The platform’s groups, pages and feeds contain vast amounts of collective knowledge, but extracting value from it is often tedious. Agentic AI could act as a personal concierge. 

Instead of scrolling endlessly, users might ask an agent to compile recommendations, summarise debates or plan activities based on recent group discussions. Facebook would shift from being a passive stream of content to an active utility layer.

Strategically, the deal strengthens Meta’s position in an increasingly competitive AI landscape. Google, Microsoft and OpenAI are all racing to commercialise agent-based systems that can execute tasks across tools and platforms.

Buying Manus accelerates Meta’s roadmap while bringing in a team with practical experience deploying autonomous agents. It also complements recent initiatives such as Meta Superintelligence Labs and expanded investments in AI infrastructure.

How Meta’s $2 billion bet on Chinese Manus AI would improve WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram experience Manus AI

The risks, however, are real. Autonomous agents raise difficult questions around reliability, accountability and user control. Errors made by an AI that takes action can carry higher stakes than mistakes in generated text. 

Privacy is another concern, particularly when agents operate inside personal messaging apps. Meta has said it will sever Manus’s former Chinese ties and implement strict data safeguards, including geo-gating and controlled access to sensitive systems. 

Meta’s acquisition of Manus is, at its core, a statement of intent. The era of generative AI as a novelty feature is fading. In its place is a new phase, where platforms compete on how effectively they can act on users’ behalf.

If Meta executes this strategy well, Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp may evolve into something more than social networks. They may become the world’s most widely used personal assistants.

The post Meta’s $2bn bet on Manus AI may improve WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram experience  first appeared on Technext.

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.03757
$0.03757$0.03757
-2.89%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
5 Top Crypto to Invest In 2025: From BNB to BlockchainFX, Who Holds the Crown?

5 Top Crypto to Invest In 2025: From BNB to BlockchainFX, Who Holds the Crown?

Detail: https://coincu.com/pr/5-top-crypto-to-invest-in-2025-from-bnb-to-blockchainfx-who-holds-the-crown/
Share
Coinstats2025/09/25 05:30
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00