TLDR Prosecutors seek to bar DEF brief after mistrial in major Ethereum MEV case Court weighs retrial as industry warns charges could chill DeFi builders GovernmentTLDR Prosecutors seek to bar DEF brief after mistrial in major Ethereum MEV case Court weighs retrial as industry warns charges could chill DeFi builders Government

Feds Oppose DeFi Education Fund as Court Weighs Retrial in High-Profile MEV Bot Case

TLDR

  • Prosecutors seek to bar DEF brief after mistrial in major Ethereum MEV case
  • Court weighs retrial as industry warns charges could chill DeFi builders
  • Government says amicus filings add little to fraud and property issues
  • Defense cites innovation stakes while prosecutors push to narrow scope
  • Outcome may shape future rules for MEV bots and crypto enforcement

Authorities pushed back against the DeFi Education Fund in a renewed dispute as the court reviewed a possible retrial in a major MEV bot case. The DeFi Education Fund appeared again in filings that debated whether the court should accept its proposed brief. The development signaled rising tension as both sides positioned themselves ahead of a potential new trial.

Government Challenges DeFi Education Fund Submission

Federal prosecutors opposed the DeFi Education Fund and asked the judge to reject its proposed brief. They argued that the DeFi Education Fund repeated legal claims that the court had already considered, and they insisted the filing added no new insight. They maintained that the brief would not support the court as it reviewed the defense request to dismiss the charges.

The mistrial declared earlier in the case intensified the dispute as both sides reassessed strategy. Jurors failed to reach a verdict during the initial trial, and the court prepared for further review. Prosecutors requested a retrial set for early 2026 and stated that the DeFi Education Fund should not influence that process.

The DeFi Education Fund continued to assert its industry-focused stance while the government emphasized established legal standards. The organization supported the defense motion to dismiss the indictment and cited broader industry effects. However, prosecutors maintained that such arguments remained irrelevant to the legal questions before the court.

Broader Industry Reactions and MEV Concerns

The case gained attention because it involved alleged misuse of automated MEV bots on the Ethereum blockchain. Authorities claimed that the two defendants carried out a targeted exploit valued at $25 million. The mistrial increased speculation because the legal outcome could shape how MEV activity is assessed in future cases.

The DeFi Education Fund argued in its draft brief that the prosecution created uncertainty for developers, and it stated that broader innovation concerns required consideration. Yet regulators countered that the case centered on fraud and property issues and not general blockchain development questions. They said the DeFi Education Fund should not influence the court’s evaluation.

Other organizations participated in the debate as well, though prosecutors also challenged their filings. Coin Center submitted an amicus brief during the original trial, and it argued against the government’s interpretation of the events. However, authorities requested that the court reject that filing too and maintained that external commentary should not affect criminal proceedings.

The defendants faced charges that included conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering. Each count carried significant penalties and a conviction in a retrial could result in lengthy prison sentences. The upcoming decisions held weight for both the defendants and the wider digital asset sector.

The DeFi Education Fund maintained that the case could shape how developers operate in decentralized finance. Yet the government insisted the court must focus on conduct rather than industry concerns. The request to block the DeFi Education Fund brief marked another decisive moment in the dispute.

The court will now determine whether to allow new filings as it prepares for the next phase. The DeFi Education Fund remains central to the conversation, and its involvement continued to spark debate.Federal prosecutors signaled that they intend to keep the proceedings narrow and strictly tied to established legal standards.

The post Feds Oppose DeFi Education Fund as Court Weighs Retrial in High-Profile MEV Bot Case appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.00055
$0.00055$0.00055
-4.01%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Prenetics Halts Bitcoin Treasury Buys, Keeps 510 BTC

Prenetics Halts Bitcoin Treasury Buys, Keeps 510 BTC

The post Prenetics Halts Bitcoin Treasury Buys, Keeps 510 BTC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Prenetics Global Limited halted its Bitcoin treasury buying program
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/01 02:48
Rep. Warren Davidson criticizes US crypto policy, calls it a threat to Bitcoin’s core principles

Rep. Warren Davidson criticizes US crypto policy, calls it a threat to Bitcoin’s core principles

The post Rep. Warren Davidson criticizes US crypto policy, calls it a threat to Bitcoin’s core principles appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Rep
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/01 03:16
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41