TLDR Justin Sun-linked wallets purchased approximately 14.89 million LIT tokens following the token generation event. These wallets now control around 5.32 percentTLDR Justin Sun-linked wallets purchased approximately 14.89 million LIT tokens following the token generation event. These wallets now control around 5.32 percent

Justin Sun-Linked Addresses Amass 14.89M LIT Tokens Post Launch

TLDR

  • Justin Sun-linked wallets purchased approximately 14.89 million LIT tokens following the token generation event.
  • These wallets now control around 5.32 percent of the circulating LIT supply.
  • Around $33 million was used from withdrawn funds to buy additional LIT on the open market.
  • The purchases were linked to liquidity provisioning rather than airdrop or points farming.
  • Lighter launched its native token LIT on December 30 with an airdrop to early users and liquidity providers.

Justin Sun-associated wallets have accumulated over 14.89 million LIT tokens, pushing their total holdings beyond 5% of the circulating supply. The acquisition followed Lighter’s token launch, with on-chain data confirming wallet funding shortly after the airdrop form closed. The purchases appear tied to liquidity provisioning rather than rewards-driven strategies.

Justin Sun Wallets Accumulate 14.89M LIT

Four wallets tied to Justin Sun received 1.6 million LIT each, totaling 6.4 million LIT, worth $17 million during the token event. These wallets were funded within 50 minutes after Lighter’s airdrop form closed, according to blockchain researcher MLM. Data shows no participation from these wallets in the earlier points farming phase.

Following the allocations, Sun deposited nearly $200 million into Lighter’s Liquidity Provider Program, per on-chain movement records. He later withdrew about $38 million from the program. Roughly $33 million from that amount went into purchasing another 13.25 million LIT tokens on the open market.

The combined holdings now stand at approximately 14.89 million LIT, valued at $39.8 million based on recent price data. This amount represents 5.32% of LIT’s circulating supply and 1.33% of its total supply. An estimated $5.5 million remains in associated wallet balances.

LIT Launch Sees Activity Surge and Price Swing

Lighter launched LIT on December 30 as the native token for its perpetual futures decentralized exchange. The DEX operates on an Ethereum zk-rollup framework, aiming to offer high-speed and low-cost trading infrastructure. The launch included a 25% airdrop for early users and liquidity providers.

This event instantly expanded LIT’s circulating supply to 250 million tokens, sparking a wave of trading and allocation shifts. The token debuted at around $3.40 but faced immediate price volatility. It dropped approximately 30% to a range between $2.45 and $2.80 following the listing.

Tokenomics assigns 24% of the total supply to investors and 26% to the core team. Both allocations are locked for one year and vest over three years. The rest is split between ecosystem incentives and community engagement mechanisms.

Liquidity Programs Attract Large Participants

Beyond the wallets linked to Justin Sun, other participants also contributed heavily to Lighter’s Liquidity Provider Program. One wallet deposited $50 million in USDC about a month prior to LIT’s launch, according to wallet trackers. That address later received 874,875 LIT tokens through indirect transfers.

While attribution for that wallet remains uncertain, analysts suggest it may represent another LLP stakeholder. The wallet’s behavior shares similarities with those tied to Sun’s cluster. The timing and transaction pattern raise questions about broader involvement from other capital providers.

Lighter’s early usage metrics remain high despite market fluctuations. The platform posted $3.7 billion in 30-day volume and $101 million in annualized fees. These figures reflect strong engagement from early adopters and liquidity providers.

The post Justin Sun-Linked Addresses Amass 14.89M LIT Tokens Post Launch appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
SUN Logo
SUN Price(SUN)
$0.019237
$0.019237$0.019237
+0.63%
USD
SUN (SUN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

TLDR: Alpenglow reduces Solana finality from 12.8 seconds to 100-150 milliseconds, a 100-fold improvement. Votor enables one or two-round block finalization through
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/03 02:29
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41