The post Is XRP’s price done bottoming out? A look at THESE metrics suggests… appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The bi-weekly TD Sequential just printed a macroThe post Is XRP’s price done bottoming out? A look at THESE metrics suggests… appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The bi-weekly TD Sequential just printed a macro

Is XRP’s price done bottoming out? A look at THESE metrics suggests…

The bi-weekly TD Sequential just printed a macro buy signal, a development that often appears near medium-term inflection points. 

This signal emerged after XRP endured months of lower highs and persistent selling pressure. Importantly, the price already slowed its descent before the count completed. Momentum stopped accelerating lower, and volatility began compressing. Such a shift may be a sign that sellers have lost urgency. 

Moreover, higher-timeframe signals filter short-term noise, which strengthens their relevance.

However, the TD buy does not act as a standalone trigger. Instead, it frames market conditions. It seemed to suggest that downside momentum may have peaked.

In such a case, risk often begins shifting asymmetrically. Upside reactions now require less force than before, provided other confirmations follow.

Descending triangle break reshapes XRP’s structure

XRP’s price recently broke out of a descending triangle after defending the $1.80–$1.85 demand zone multiple times. 

Each dip into that area attracted buyers quickly, limiting downside continuation. That behavior reflected absorption rather than panic. 

As the price compressed towards the apex, pressure built naturally. Eventually, buyers forced a breakout. This move shifts focus towards $2.20 – A key reaction level where sellers previously controlled the price. 

Acceptance above that zone would expose $2.60–$2.67, a former range support that now acts as resistance. Above that area, the $3-level stands as the next major upside objective. 

However, failure to hold above $1.80 would weaken the breakout narrative and reopen downside risk.

Source: TradingView

ETF inflows reveal steady institutional accumulation

At the time of writing, ETF data revealed that clients added $5.58 million worth of XRP in a single session, pushing total ETF-held assets to $1.24 billion. This accumulation occurred while pthe rice hovered near $1.80–$1.90, not during a breakout. 

That timing matters. Institutions typically scale exposure during consolidation, not momentum expansion. As a result, these inflows may be a sign of strategic positioning rather than reactive buying. 

Moreover, ETF accumulation removes circulating supply without demanding immediate upside. That dynamic supports price stability first, expansion later. 

Additionally, these flows align with the macro TD buy signal, rather than contradict it. In its own way, institutional behavior may be reinforcing the idea that downside conviction is fading. 

Source: X

Spot outflows confirm supply absorption phase

Spot exchange data has seen persistent net outflows, including a recent -$7.82 million reading as XRP traded near $1.87. This trend could allude to reduced willingness to sell at press time levels. 

Traders often withdraw assets when they expect lower downside risk. While outflows alone do not drive rallies, they tighten available supply. Combined with the structural support, such a dynamic shifts balance. 

Sellers are now facing thinner liquidity, something that increases price sensitivity to demand. Moreover, outflows persisted even after the triangle breakout, reinforcing confidence rather than caution. 

Consequently, any sustained bid pressure could move the price more efficiently. In doing so, the market would absorb supply, rather than distribute it.

Source: CoinGlass

Rising funding rates signal growing conviction

At press time, funding rates remained elevated too, with the latest reading reaching 0.006 – Eepresenting a 94.58% hike. Traders are now paying to maintain long exposure, which is evidence of confidence. However, context remains critical. 

Funding rates rose while the price consolidated near $1.85–$1.90, not during an impulsive rally. That divergence suggests positioning, rather than euphoria. 

Additionally, leverage entered after the structure improved, not during a breakdown. Such a sequencing ordinarily reduces immediate fragility. 

Still, elevated funding introduces risk. If the price fails to hold above the breakout zone, leverage could unwind quickly. For now though, conviction is building carefully, supported by structure and flows.

Source: CryptoQuant

Is XRP preparing for a broader recovery?

XRP is now trading at a point where technical structure, institutional flows, and derivatives positioning converge meaningfully. The macro TD buy framed the shift, the triangle breakout confirmed it, and capital flows are now supporting it. 

While short-term volatility remains likely, evidence favors accumulation over distribution. If price maintains acceptance above the former triangle and holds $1.80, momentum could expand towards higher resistance zones. 

However, this setup does not guarantee immediate upside. Instead, it means XRP may have completed its bottoming process and entered a phase where sustained recovery will be increasingly viable.


Final Thoughts

  • Structural breakout, ETF inflows, and spot outflows suggest XRP has entered an accumulation phase.

  • Sustained acceptance above key support could allow momentum to expand toward higher resistance zones.

Next: Ethereum’s 2026 roadmap puts institutional privacy front and center – Details

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/is-xrps-price-done-bottoming-out-a-look-at-these-metrics-suggest/

Market Opportunity
XRP Logo
XRP Price(XRP)
$1,99
$1,99$1,99
+3,72%
USD
XRP (XRP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

TLDR: Alpenglow reduces Solana finality from 12.8 seconds to 100-150 milliseconds, a 100-fold improvement. Votor enables one or two-round block finalization through
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/03 02:29
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41