The post December Losses Fall 60% To $76M appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Losses from crypto hacks plunged in December, yet a handful of sophisticated attacksThe post December Losses Fall 60% To $76M appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Losses from crypto hacks plunged in December, yet a handful of sophisticated attacks

December Losses Fall 60% To $76M

Losses from crypto hacks plunged in December, yet a handful of sophisticated attacks still drained $76 million from users and platforms.

Sharp drop in December losses, but big single incidents

Blockchain security firm PeckShield reported that overall crypto hack losses fell by 60 percent in December compared with November, totaling approximately $76 million. However, the decline in total damage masked a trend toward fewer but much larger incidents.

According to PeckShield, there were 26 major hacks during the month. That said, a small number of high-impact attacks, especially scams targeting addresses and private keys, accounted for most of the losses.

Address poisoning scam drives the largest December theft

The biggest single loss came from an address poisoning scam that resulted in a theft of $50 million. In this attack, scammers generated addresses designed to closely resemble a victim’s legitimate wallet, then sent tiny transactions to plant those fake addresses in the victim’s history.

Moreover, the fake addresses typically match the beginning and end of the real one, making them difficult to distinguish at a glance. Victims often copy the wrong address while rushing through a transfer, unknowingly sending funds directly to the attacker.

PeckShield warned that these exploits rely on visual confusion and urgency. The firm advised users to verify every character of a destination address manually and avoid relying solely on past transaction records or copied data when moving funds.

Multi-signature wallet breach exposes key management risks

Another major December incident involved a leaked private key tied to a multi signature wallet, which allowed attackers to steal $27.3 million. Despite the theoretical security benefits of multi-signature setups, weak operational security around key storage created a single point of failure.

The stolen funds represented more than one-third of December’s total losses. However, the case underscored that complex wallet architectures still depend on disciplined key management, including secure generation, distribution, and backup procedures.

Security experts stressed that leveraging hardware solutions and strict operational policies can significantly reduce the risk of large-scale thefts involving shared wallets.

Browser wallet exploit and ongoing extension risks

On Christmas Day, a browser wallet exploit hit the Trust Wallet browser extension, causing losses of around $7 million. The incident reinforced concerns that browser-based wallets remain exposed because of their continuous internet connectivity and interaction with untrusted websites.

Moreover, security firms reiterated guidance that users should limit funds kept in browser extensions and mobile wallets. They recommended hardware devices and cold storage solutions for long-term holdings, highlighting cold storage security as a critical defense layer.

Users were also urged never to share private keys or seed phrases under any circumstances, and to treat any unsolicited request for wallet credentials as an immediate red flag.

Social engineering and phishing remain powerful attack tools

Beyond technical exploits, social engineering continued to generate substantial losses. U.S. authorities charged a Brooklyn man with orchestrating a phishing crypto scam that stole $16 million from nearly 100 Coinbase users.

Prosecutors allege the suspect posed as a Coinbase employee, contacting victims and claiming their funds were at risk. That said, he allegedly directed users to transfer assets to wallets he controlled, using urgency and fear to bypass normal caution instead of exploiting any software vulnerability.

Officials emphasized that no technical breach of Coinbase’s systems occurred. Instead, the case illustrated how persuasive social tactics can be as damaging as direct protocol or wallet exploits.

PeckShield’s outlook on evolving crypto threats

PeckShield concluded that, despite the sharp monthly decline in headline losses from crypto hacks, core security risks remain very much active. The firm noted that major attack vectors now blend technical tricks with psychological manipulation.

Moreover, the company argued that routine practices such as double-checking transaction details, maintaining offline backups, and using hardware devices for cold storage security can prevent many of the most common theft scenarios.

In summary, December’s figures highlight that while aggregate losses dropped, individual incidents grew larger and more targeted, keeping robust security hygiene essential for all crypto users.

Source: https://en.cryptonomist.ch/2026/01/02/crypto-hacks-december-losses/

Market Opportunity
BIG Logo
BIG Price(BIG)
$0.00019875
$0.00019875$0.00019875
+9.51%
USD
BIG (BIG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

TLDR: Alpenglow reduces Solana finality from 12.8 seconds to 100-150 milliseconds, a 100-fold improvement. Votor enables one or two-round block finalization through
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/03 02:29
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41