The post Bitcoin Scores First Year with Zero Obituaries: Details appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The mainstream media has officially run out of ink to writeThe post Bitcoin Scores First Year with Zero Obituaries: Details appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The mainstream media has officially run out of ink to write

Bitcoin Scores First Year with Zero Obituaries: Details

The mainstream media has officially run out of ink to write Bitcoin’s epitaph. This has happened for the first time since the days when Satoshi Nakamoto, the elusive creator of the flagship cryptocurrency, was still active on BitcoinTalk.

According to the data provided by Cypherpunk Holdings CTO Jameson Lopp, the number of “Bitcoin Obituaries” collapsed to just zero in 2025. 

In his latest social media post, Lopp shared a bar chart tracking the “death” of the crypto king over the last 15 years. 

The visual data shows the “death narrative” peaking in 2017. Despite the massive rally that pushed BTC into the mainstream, there were roughly 125 distinct declarations of Bitcoin’s demise. This was likely due to the frenzied ICO boom and the violent crash from the $20,000 all-time high. Unsurprisingly, the media skepticism carried into the 2018 “Crypto Winter.” Over 90 obituaries were published back then as prices cratered.

You Might Also Like

There was a smaller resurgence of skepticism in 2021 with just under 50 obituaries.

Surprisingly enough, the critics were noticeably quieter compared to the previous cycles. Despite the collapse of FTX and the macro headwinds of 2022, experts did not bother writing more obituaries. By 2024, the count had dwindled to single digits.

Prominent obituaries 

The first obituary was published by The Underground Economist all the way back in December 2010. Back then, Bitcoin was still trading at less than $1. The author argued that Bitcoin would constantly experience deflation due to its fixed supply, meaning that it would never actually take off as a viable currency. To be fair, they were not completely wrong. 

Forbes famously became the very first mainstream outlet to publish a Bitcoin obituary all the way back in June 2011. This was written in the immediate aftermath of the first major Mt. Gox hack. Author Tim Worstall argued that Bitcoin was effectively finished since it was difficult to trade it. Later that summer, Gizmodo Australia published an article about how the original cryptocurrency was dying. 

Perhaps the most famous early obituary was published by Wired in November 2011. It was a long-form deep dive that chronicled the “death” of Bitcoin after its crash from the $30 highs of mid-2011 down to $2. The tone was definitive: the experiment was over.

Source: https://u.today/bitcoin-scores-first-year-with-zero-obituaries-details

Market Opportunity
ZeroLend Logo
ZeroLend Price(ZERO)
$0.000012304
$0.000012304$0.000012304
-2.73%
USD
ZeroLend (ZERO) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

TLDR: Alpenglow reduces Solana finality from 12.8 seconds to 100-150 milliseconds, a 100-fold improvement. Votor enables one or two-round block finalization through
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/03 02:29
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41