In about an hour, we built and deployed “Pixel Golf,” a 2D physics game running on the Avalanche blockchain.In about an hour, we built and deployed “Pixel Golf,” a 2D physics game running on the Avalanche blockchain.

I Built an On-Chain Video Game in the Time It Takes to Watch Netflix

In the time it takes to watch a Netflix episode, I built a complete, on-chain video game.

I’m a solo developer. My only partner was an AI copilot. And in about an hour, we built and deployed “Pixel Golf,” a 2D physics game running on the Avalanche blockchain.

This isn’t just a fun experiment. It’s a blueprint for the future of game distribution — a future where “buying” a game means you actually, truly own it.

The Problem with “Ownership”

For the last two decades, we’ve been trained to accept a new definition of “ownership.” When you buy a game on Steam, you aren’t buying a game. You’re buying a license to play that game, indefinitely, at the sole discretion of the platform.

If that platform decides to revoke your access, your game is gone. If that platform disappears tomorrow, your entire library vanishes into the digital ether.

You own nothing. You’re just a long-term renter.

I believe there’s a better way. When you buy a Griggs game, you own it. Period. My little golf game is the proof.

The 60-Minute “Pixel Golf” Challenge

My project goal was simple: create a fun, 2D pixel-art golf game. The core loop? Set your power, set your angle, and try to get the ball in the hole in the fewest strokes.

The “team” was just me and my AI copilot, Gemini. The “stack” was just as lean:

  1. index.html: The user interface and Web3 logic.
  2. game.js: The core physics engine.
  3. PixelGolfPass.sol: A Solidity smart contract for the NFT.

Here’s how the hour broke down.

Minutes 0–10: Forging the “Game Pass”

We didn’t start with the game. We started with ownership.

Before writing a single line of game logic, we deployed a smart contract to the Avalanche blockchain. This contract, PixelGolfPass.sol, is an ERC-721 NFT. It does one simple thing: it lets a user mint a unique "Game Pass" for 0.1 AVAX.

This NFT isn’t a cosmetic item. It’s not a skin. It is the key. It represents your permanent, irrevocable, and sellable right to play this game.

Minutes 10–25: Building the “Blockchain Bouncer”

With our contract live on the mainnet, we built the front-end in index.html. This wasn't just a UI; it was the bridge to the blockchain.

\ \ Using Ethers.js, we wired up the “Connect Wallet” button. The moment you connect, the JavaScript performs a crucial check:

const hasMinted = await contract.hasMinted(yourWalletAddress);

Instead of checking a private database on my server, the game asks the blockchain itself if you are a valid owner. If the hasMinted function returns true, the game UI appears. If false, the "Mint" button appears.

The game doesn’t care who you are. It only cares about what you own.

Minutes 25–50: The Physics & The Bugs

This is where the AI copilot shined. We hammered out the entire physics engine in game.js. We coded the projectile motion (gravity, velocity), collision detection, and ground friction.

And, of course, we hit bugs.

First, the game got stuck in an infinite “loading” loop. We quickly diagnosed that the ball’s physics were “jittering” on the ground, never truly stopping, so the game loop never told the UI the turn was over. The fix? A simple check to “settle” the ball’s velocity to zero when it was moving slowly.

Next, you could roll directly over the hole without winning. The win condition was too precise. We debugged it together, widening the hole’s detection radius to make the game feel fair and fun.

Minutes 50–60: Integration and Final Polish

With the bugs squashed, we finished the loop. We hooked the “Launch” button to the physics engine and had the engine call back to the UI to update the score. We added the “Course Complete” screen, which pops up after the 5th hole, ready to submit your final score.

In one hour, we had a fully functional, token-gated game.

This is True Digital Ownership

Here’s the “aha” moment.

The game itself — the index.html and game.js files—is just a set of static files. They can be hosted anywhere. On GitHub Pages, on a personal server, or even on decentralized storage like Arweave.

If my website goes down tomorrow, it doesn’t matter.

Anyone can re-upload those static files to a new URL. And when you navigate to that new site and connect your wallet, it will still check the immutable Avalanche blockchain, see your Game Pass NFT, and grant you access.

Your ownership isn’t tied to my website. It’s tied to your wallet.

You can’t be banned. Your game can’t be revoked. You can even sell your Game Pass on the open market, just like you’d sell a physical game cartridge.

This isn’t just a simple golf game. It’s a new model. The AI-assisted workflow made it possible to build in an hour, but the on-chain ownership model makes it revolutionary. This is what the future of gaming looks like.

Want to play it? \n https://www.damiangriggs.com/web3/web3-games

\

Market Opportunity
SQUID MEME Logo
SQUID MEME Price(GAME)
$32.1277
$32.1277$32.1277
-1.73%
USD
SQUID MEME (GAME) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FBI says North Korea’s Kimsuky APT uses malicious QR codes to spearphish U.S. entities

FBI says North Korea’s Kimsuky APT uses malicious QR codes to spearphish U.S. entities

The post FBI says North Korea’s Kimsuky APT uses malicious QR codes to spearphish U.S. entities appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The FBI says Kimsuky APT, a
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/10 02:55
a16z targets AI and crypto after $15B fundraising year in 2025

a16z targets AI and crypto after $15B fundraising year in 2025

The post a16z targets AI and crypto after $15B fundraising year in 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) secured over $15 billion
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/10 03:13
Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future

Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future

BitcoinWorld Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future A significant warning has emerged from financial giant JPMorgan, signaling a potentially challenging future for the stablecoin market. This isn’t just a minor blip; it’s a stark reminder that the booming world of digital assets faces a critical juncture, especially for those relying on the stability of stablecoins. JPMorgan’s recent research note suggests that unless the broader cryptocurrency market expands dramatically, stablecoin issuers are heading towards a fierce ‘zero-sum game’ scenario. The Alarming Truth About the Stablecoin Market What exactly does a ‘zero-sum game’ mean for the stablecoin market? Essentially, it implies that for one stablecoin to gain market share, another must lose it. This isn’t about overall growth where everyone benefits; it’s about a fixed pie where new entrants only succeed by taking a slice from existing players. JPMorgan analysts point to a rapidly increasing number of new stablecoin projects vying for attention. Tether recently announced its unregulated stablecoin, USAT. Hyperliquid plans to launch USDH, aiming to reduce its dependence on Circle’s USDC. Even traditional fintech powerhouses like Robinhood and Revolut are developing their own stablecoins. This surge of new issuers intensifies competition significantly. While the overall stablecoin market capitalization has reached an impressive $278 billion, its share of the total crypto market has remained stagnant, averaging below 8% since 2020. This stagnation, according to JPMorgan, is a key indicator of the brewing zero-sum challenge. Why is the Stablecoin Market Becoming So Crowded? The influx of new players into the stablecoin market isn’t accidental; it’s driven by various strategic motivations. Many projects aim to gain greater control over their financial infrastructure and reduce reliance on third-party stablecoins. For instance, Hyperliquid’s move to USDH is a clear example of a platform seeking self-sufficiency and potentially lower operational costs. Furthermore, established fintech firms like Robinhood and Revolut see stablecoins as a natural extension of their existing services. They can integrate these digital assets into their platforms, offering new functionalities and potentially attracting a broader user base. However, this expansion comes with a caveat: if the overall crypto market doesn’t grow proportionally, these new offerings will merely fragment the existing demand, making profitability and widespread adoption harder to achieve for all. The core challenge remains the limited expansion of the total crypto market relative to the growing supply of stablecoins. This dynamic creates an environment where innovation must go hand-in-hand with genuine market expansion, not just internal competition. Navigating the Competitive Stablecoin Market Landscape So, what does this intense competition mean for users and the broader crypto ecosystem? For one, it could lead to increased innovation as issuers strive to differentiate their offerings through better features, lower fees, or enhanced security. However, it also presents potential risks, particularly if some stablecoins fail to gain traction or face liquidity issues in a highly competitive environment. Users should exercise caution and conduct thorough due diligence when choosing stablecoins. For existing giants like USDC, the entry of new competitors means they must continue to innovate and maintain their market leadership. Regulatory clarity also plays a crucial role here. As more entities enter the space, the demand for clear, consistent regulations will only grow, potentially shaping the future landscape of the stablecoin market significantly. Ultimately, the long-term health of the stablecoin ecosystem hinges on the ability of the entire cryptocurrency market to attract new capital and users. Without this broader expansion, JPMorgan’s warning of a zero-sum game could become a stark reality. In conclusion, JPMorgan’s recent warning serves as a potent reminder of the escalating competition within the stablecoin market. While innovation and new entrants are exciting, the core challenge lies in the stagnant growth of the broader crypto market. For stablecoins to truly thrive beyond a zero-sum dynamic, a significant influx of new capital and users into the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem is paramount. The future success of these digital anchors depends on collective market expansion, not just internal rivalry. Frequently Asked Questions About the Stablecoin Market Q1: What is a ‘zero-sum game’ in the context of the stablecoin market? A1: A ‘zero-sum game’ means that for one stablecoin to gain market share, another stablecoin must lose an equivalent amount. It implies that the overall market size for stablecoins is not growing, forcing issuers to compete for a fixed pool of users and capital. Q2: Why is JPMorgan concerned about the stablecoin market? A2: JPMorgan is concerned because despite the stablecoin market’s growth in total value, its share of the overall crypto market capitalization has stagnated. With many new entrants, they believe competition will intensify, leading to a zero-sum dynamic unless the broader crypto market significantly expands. Q3: Which new stablecoin issuers are mentioned in the warning? A3: The warning highlights new entrants such as Tether’s unregulated stablecoin USAT, Hyperliquid’s planned USDH, and stablecoins being developed by fintech firms Robinhood and Revolut. Q4: What could be the implications for users of stablecoins? A4: For users, increased competition could lead to more innovative features, potentially lower fees, and better services. However, it also means a greater need for due diligence to assess the stability and reliability of various stablecoins, especially if some struggle in a crowded market. Q5: How can the stablecoin market avoid a zero-sum outcome? A5: According to JPMorgan, avoiding a zero-sum outcome requires significant expansion of the broader cryptocurrency market. This means attracting new capital and users into the entire crypto ecosystem, thereby growing the ‘pie’ rather than just re-dividing existing slices. Did JPMorgan’s warning about the stablecoin market catch your attention? Share this crucial insight with your network and join the conversation about the future of digital assets. Your thoughts and perspectives are invaluable! To learn more about the latest stablecoin market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping stablecoin market institutional adoption. This post Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/19 15:45