AI promises to transform industries, boost productivity and unlock new business opportunities. Yet, many enterprises don’t experience this. Projects stall, toolsAI promises to transform industries, boost productivity and unlock new business opportunities. Yet, many enterprises don’t experience this. Projects stall, tools

Why do AI projects fail, and how can enterprises get it right in 2026?

AI promises to transform industries, boost productivity and unlock new business opportunities. Yet, many enterprises don’t experience this. Projects stall, tools and solutions go underutilised, and the anticipated value of AI simply fails to materialise.  

Clearly AI is falling short, but it’s not because of the technology. The hidden bottleneck here is the legacy consulting model that many are, but shouldn’t be, relying on for expertise. We recently found that Britain’s largest businesses now spend over £320 billion annually on AI, with more than £66 billion of that going to external consultants. That’s twice the UK’s budget surplus going towards support for AI projects, all for a success rate that’s a coin flip.  

In essence, they’re spending enormous amounts for AI advice that is often misaligned or disconnected from practical realities. This raises a critical question: how can enterprises avoid sinking costs into the wrong support and truly set themselves up for AI success in 2026 and beyond? 

The legacy consulting problem 

We all know that traditional consultancies operate on billable hours and large teams; this creates incentives that reward activity over outcomes. Organisations pay for effort rather than tangible results and, despite significant investment, AI projects are continuing to fall short. In fact, around 30% of AI project failures occur because organisations prioritise technology itself, rather than the value it is meant to deliver according to our survey of enterprise leaders. Time isn’t on their side either, as a third of projects take more than six months to show any meaningful results at all. And all this comes at a time where many are under pressure to adopt at speed, with impact often being the trade-off.  

As it stands, the traditional consulting model itself is structurally misaligned for enterprises’ AI needs. Advice is never entirely impartial as consultancies often push preferred vendors, licenses or solutions that generate revenue for them rather than meet actual customer needs. Knowledge gaps compound the problem. Many legacy firms lack the deep technical expertise to truly understand AI’s capabilities and potential, meaning organisations end up effectively funding the consultants’ own transformation as they learn on the job. 

The result is predictable, but all too common. Business problems are tackled by bloated armies of consultants who suggest AI tools that go unused, as care hasn’t been taken to train people up to use them. This suggests a more systemic issue, all rooted in a model that prioritises delivery over adoption. 

Rethinking AI adoption  

To unlock real impact, organisations need to rethink how they implement and scale AI with two main pillars in mind: putting people at the heart of technical transformation and staying laser focused on measurable outcomes. When working with external partners, these priorities need to be communicated and agreed upon from the outset. 

People-first 

Harvard recently found that workers using AI complete tasks 25% faster and produce 40% higher-quality results, showing the true impact of amplifying individuals’ expertise. But those results only come when people are able to use AI tools to maximum effect, and that comes through training and upskilling that accounts for the real workflows being augmented. 

In 2026 and beyond, there needs to be greater focus on hands-on guidance, clear explanations and promoting simple ways for people to apply AI in their daily work to boost overall trust. This allows leaders to gain clarity on what good AI use looks like, while teams learn from shared examples, community learning and best practice.  

By embedding practical know-how, celebrating early wins and continually sharing what works across the organisation, a people-centric approach turns AI into a tool people want to use, not something they’re being forced to adopt. The result is meaningful performance improvements, fewer friction points and lasting value for the people who will use AI every day (if they don’t already). 

Value-first 

In parallel, enterprises should adopt a value-first mindset that takes a holistic view of how different processes overlap and how AI can create efficiencies across them. This starts by identifying high-value use cases across the organisation and honing in on where AI can have the most impact.  

From there, proven technologies can be deployed in fast, iterative cycles. Enterprises and their partners can structure data through ontologies, build agentic systems that fit existing stacks or integrate AI into decision-making workflows – whatever is best suited for the problem at hand.  

Organisations must concentrate on ongoing optimisation and knowledge transfer internally to ensure projects aren’t a ‘one and done’. AI is evolving so quickly, what’s valuable today might not be in a few years’ time. By putting clearly defined goals and objectives at the heart of adoption strategies, enterprises and internal consultants can set themselves up for more success in a more sustainable way, prioritising the tools and transformations that will move the needle. 

This will allow teams to further adopt AI confidently, embed it into daily workflows and realise the long-term business value of intelligence. AI should then become a trusted, practical tool that strengthens capabilities, improves processes and really delivers sustained impact across the organisation. 

Looking ahead 

The enterprises that succeed will be those that take both a people-first and value-first approach, prioritising upskilling and meaningful results over investing in the technology without clear goalposts to aim at.  

AI will soon no longer be defined by individual experimentation or siloed pilots, and will be integrated holistically across organisations, powering all that they do. Successful adoption will move beyond the isolated projects we’ve seen fail to date, laying the new foundations for the modern enterprise – think shared agents, collective prompt libraries and integrated workflows. 

Breaking free from the legacy consulting model is central to this transformation. By moving away from outdated processes and priorities, organisations can focus on partnerships, processes and structures that deliver real impact – minimising wasted spend and getting the results they need in the process. 

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.04179
$0.04179$0.04179
+0.94%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
XRP Price May Drop To This Level Before Major Rally

XRP Price May Drop To This Level Before Major Rally

The post XRP Price May Drop To This Level Before Major Rally appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News 2026 began on a bullish note for XRP as the token price rallied
Share
CoinPedia2026/01/10 15:12
Pump.fun Revamps Creator Fees With Fee Sharing and New Controls

Pump.fun Revamps Creator Fees With Fee Sharing and New Controls

The post Pump.fun Revamps Creator Fees With Fee Sharing and New Controls appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pump.fun co-founder Alon Cohen said the Solana-based
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/10 15:41