Why Blockchain Privacy Is Still Broken, According to Digital Asset CEO

Yuval Rooz, Co-founder and CEO of Digital Asset, highlighted that the majority of blockchain transactions are highly transparent, leaving users with almost no privacy. In most public wallets, movements of funds can be observed in real time, and large transactions often trigger market reactions.

Indeed, for example, when a large Bitcoin holder begins to move coins to an exchange, traders often begin to sell in front of them, anticipating a big sell-off. This kind of front-running shows that there isn’t really privacy on most networks, Rooz said. Privacy has long been seen as a bug, not a feature in crypto, and that leaves users open to market manipulation and surveillance.

Privacy vs. Anonymity: Understanding the Difference

Rooz explained that privacy and anonymity are not the same thing. Whereas governments and regulators are concerned that anonymity can mask illegal activities, they tend to support privacy tools that nonetheless allow some oversight when necessary. Privacy does not mean that everything is hidden; it means protecting sensitive users’ data while still allowing audits when something goes wrong.

A privacy-first system keeps the bad actors from abusing the network while giving regulators the tools they need to investigate suspected crimes. This is an important distinction for developing blockchain systems that will be both secure and rules-compliant.

Balancing Blockchain Privacy With Regulatory Compliance

Digital Asset is taking this challenge on with its platform Kempton. Rooz describes Kempton as a system that provides “good privacy” while still allowing for regulatory audits if there’s a need. That means it shields users from front-running and any watching of assets, while remaining open to audits or investigations.

According to Rooz, this could help more people use it, as users will be confident of the privacy of their transactions without facilitating any illegal activities. By making privacy easy to audit, Kempton hopes to be a good fit for exchanges, institutions, and individuals who want security without added regulatory risk.

This is the necessary balance the future of blockchain depends on, as Rooz emphasized. Privacy should be a basic feature rather than one added later, but it has to work with rules that satisfy regulators. Then, platforms like Kempton would change how people use digital assets: protection from bad actors and too much sharing, with regulators only called in where necessary.

Also Read: BNY Mellon Integrates Blockchain Deposits as ICE and Citadel Join Early Adoption