TLDR Over 100 community bank leaders have urged U.S. senators to close loopholes in stablecoin legislation. The American Bankers Association warned that up to $TLDR Over 100 community bank leaders have urged U.S. senators to close loopholes in stablecoin legislation. The American Bankers Association warned that up to $

JPMorgan Dismisses Risk as Bankers Warn of $6.6T Stablecoin Threat

TLDR

  • Over 100 community bank leaders have urged U.S. senators to close loopholes in stablecoin legislation.
  • The American Bankers Association warned that up to $6.6 trillion in deposits could leave traditional banks.
  • Bankers claim stablecoin issuers offer indirect yield incentives that threaten community lending systems.
  • The ABA said the GENIUS Act failed to prevent stablecoin affiliates from rewarding users through third parties.
  • JPMorgan responded by stating that stablecoins do not pose a systemic risk to the banking sector.

More than 100 U.S. community bank executives have asked lawmakers to tighten stablecoin laws, warning of huge deposit outflows, while JPMorgan has dismissed the concerns, describing stablecoins as one of many coexisting payment methods, pushing back on the American Bankers Association’s growing alarm.

Community Bankers Cite Trillions at Risk

Community bank leaders urged U.S. senators to plug legal loopholes in stablecoin rules. They cited risks to trillions in traditional deposits. Their Jan. 5 letter, sent via the ABA’s Community Bankers Council, warned of widespread impacts.

The bankers said stablecoin issuers are bypassing interest bans by offering indirect yield. These incentives could attract depositors away from local banks. This, they argue, would weaken local credit access.

The ABA referenced Treasury estimates placing $6.6 trillion of deposits at risk. They argued current rules do not fully address these practices.

The GENIUS Act, recently passed, aimed to regulate stablecoins. But community bankers say it failed to stop indirect rewards via crypto exchanges. They now seek stricter controls on affiliated parties.

The bankers stressed that community lending would suffer if deposits shrink. They said small businesses, students, and farmers depend on local credit. Unlike banks, stablecoin firms lack deposit insurance.

JPMorgan Rejects Systemic Risk Concerns

JPMorgan took a different stance on stablecoin growth. It dismissed the idea that they pose a systemic threat. A spokesperson said stablecoins represent just one layer in a broad money system.

JPMorgan sees deposit tokens and stablecoins as part of a larger payments landscape. Their view contrasts with smaller banks’ warnings. This reflects a divide in banking sector perspectives.

Crypto analyst Joel Valenzuela called the letter a familiar move. “Stablecoins present direct competition,” he said. “Banks are trying to protect their interests.”

Bank trade groups have repeatedly opposed stablecoins. In previous letters, they pushed to restrict issuance to banks. Some also called for banning tokens offering returns.

Industry Figures Question Banking Motives

Others in the crypto sector criticized the bankers’ concerns. Michael Treacy of OpenPayd said it was about protecting old business models. He questioned the intent behind the regulation push.

“This is less a stablecoin debate,” Treacy stated. “It’s more about enabling competition,” he added in response to the ABA’s letter. He drew parallels to money market fund debates.

Crypto lender Bitlease also responded. Founder Nima Beni labeled the concerns as fear-driven. “It’s because banks failed to offer competitive, transparent products,” he said.

The ABA is now pushing for Congress to expand the GENIUS Act. They want the law to also cover stablecoin affiliates and partners. This would affect exchanges offering indirect yield.

The post JPMorgan Dismisses Risk as Bankers Warn of $6.6T Stablecoin Threat appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.04925
$0.04925$0.04925
+4.45%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns

How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns

The post How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclaimer: This article is a sponsored
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 09:02
Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT?

Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT?

The post Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Since it touched a high of $4.5, Lighter has
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 08:46