Microsoft says China is beating U.S. AI firms in Africa, Russia, and Belarus by using cheap open models and government subsidies.Microsoft says China is beating U.S. AI firms in Africa, Russia, and Belarus by using cheap open models and government subsidies.

Microsoft warns China is beating the U.S. in AI influence across Africa, Russia and Belarus

2026/01/13 15:32
4 min read

Microsoft is calling it like it sees it; China is winning the AI race far from Silicon Valley, and it’s doing it with cheap tech and state money, taking control of regions Africa, Russia, Belarus, and many more.

While American firms are still pushing for paid subscriptions and locked ecosystems, Chinese AI tools are spreading fast thanks to open-source models and heavy subsidies.

Brad Smith, president of Microsoft, said DeepSeek’s rapid growth shows how global the fight for AI dominance has become.

“We have to recognize that right now, unlike a year ago, China has an open-source model, and increasingly more than one, that is competitive,” he said. “They benefit from subsidization by the Chinese government. They benefit from subsidies that enable [them] to basically undercut American companies based on price.”

DeepSeek expands into African and sanctioned markets

New data from Microsoft shows DeepSeek’s AI model R1 has taken over in markets where American tech firms have limited reach. The company holds 56% of the AI market in Belarus, 49% in Cuba, and 43% in Russia.

In Africa, it’s the same story. DeepSeek has already captured 18% in Ethiopia and 17% in Zimbabwe, fueled by low costs and no strings attached.

The R1 model launched a year ago and gained traction quickly. According to Microsoft, it helped speed up AI use across the global south by being affordable and easy to access.

That growth has pushed China ahead of the U.S. in global usage of open AI systems, which developers can use, edit, or build on freely. That’s a major difference from how OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic run their tools; those are locked, paid, and built for control.

Smith said poorer countries need help if they’re going to stand a chance.

“If we rely on private capital flows alone, I don’t think that will be sufficient to compete with a competitor that is subsidised to the degree that Chinese companies often are,” said Smith. He called for international development banks and lending institutions to step in and fund data centers and energy costs.

Bright Simons, an AI analyst from Ghana’s IMANI think-tank, said it’s hard to measure DeepSeek’s full impact, but confirmed that Chinese models are now the go-to for many users.

“Africans can’t afford very expensive solutions apart from open source, so you have to go to [Meta’s] Llama or Chinese options,” he said. He also mentioned local tools like Masakhane, built across Africa, and InkubaLM from South Africa.

Microsoft says U.S. tech risks losing AI war without help

The bigger issue, according to Microsoft, is how AI adoption is spreading, and where it’s not. In late 2025, 24% of people in the global north were using AI. That number was just 14% in the global south, with a worldwide average of 16%.

Smith called this a “cause for concern,” warning that if the U.S. doesn’t invest, this divide will grow and so will inequality.

He said the AI divide is now part of the larger battle between the U.S. and China. Microsoft believes the U.S. needs both private investment in training and infrastructure, and public support from governments and banks. “What we do have is, as American companies, a stronger reputation for trust. We have access to better chips than the Chinese companies do… [but] you always have to compete on price,” Smith said.

DeepSeek made waves in Silicon Valley by releasing a strong AI reasoning model that worked well despite needing less compute power. Its next big model is expected to land just before the Lunar New Year.

But Smith also warned that if U.S. tech companies ignore Africa, they’re ignoring the future. “If American tech companies or western governments were to close their eyes to the future in Africa, they would be closing their eyes to the future of the world more broadly, and I think that would be a grave mistake,” he said.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.001177
$0.001177$0.001177
+6.22%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Stellar’s Origin Story Matters Again As Tokenized XLM Dollars Move Mainstream

Stellar’s Origin Story Matters Again As Tokenized XLM Dollars Move Mainstream

Stellar Lumens is easy to misread because its “introduction” was never a pitch for a general-purpose crypto computer. From the very start, it framed itself as
Share
Coinstats2026/02/19 06:21
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Tutor Perini Announces Conference Call to Discuss Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Results

Tutor Perini Announces Conference Call to Discuss Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Results

LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Tutor Perini Corporation (NYSE: TPC) (the “Company”), a leading civil, building and specialty construction company, announced today
Share
AI Journal2026/02/19 07:15