The bipartisan Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act would exempt non-custodial crypto developers from money transmitter rules, aiming to cut legal risk and keep The bipartisan Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act would exempt non-custodial crypto developers from money transmitter rules, aiming to cut legal risk and keep

Lummis–Wyden bill shields non-custodial crypto devs from money transmitter rules

The bipartisan Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act would exempt non-custodial crypto developers from money transmitter rules, aiming to cut legal risk and keep builders in the U.S.

Summary
  • Senators Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden introduced the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act to clarify that non-custodial developers are not money transmitters.​
  • The bill protects activities like writing code, maintaining decentralized networks, and building self-custody tools when developers lack unilateral control over user assets.​
  • Industry groups say clearer lines between infrastructure builders and intermediaries could reduce criminal liability fears and stem the outflow of projects overseas.​

Two U.S. senators introduced bipartisan legislation on January 12, 2026, aimed at providing regulatory clarity for cryptocurrency developers by exempting non-custodial builders from money transmitter licensing requirements.

Lummis-Wyden bill to protect non-custodial crypto developers

Senators Cynthia Lummis, a Republican, and Ron Wyden, a Democrat, proposed the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act to address regulatory uncertainty facing developers in the digital asset sector, according to statements from the lawmakers.

The bill seeks to exempt cryptocurrency developers who do not process or control user funds from federal and state money transmitter rules. Under the proposed legislation, creating computer software, writing code, or maintaining blockchain networks would not generate licensing obligations.

The measure defines developers who lack unilateral control over assets as non-money transmitters, establishing a legal distinction between infrastructure development and custodial financial activity. Protected activities would include blockchain software development, maintenance of decentralized networks, self-custody tools, and infrastructure services.

Senator Lummis stated that developers have faced regulatory threats despite having no custody roles, arguing that money transmitter classifications restrict innovation without reducing money laundering risks. Senator Wyden cited privacy and free speech concerns, stating that applying rules designed for exchanges to code writers reflects a misunderstanding of the technology.

Blockchain developers have raised concerns about potential criminal liability for third-party use of their software, according to industry observers. Some projects have relocated operations overseas to reduce regulatory risk, the senators noted.

The legislation represents a response to increased enforcement actions involving non-custodial protocols that have alarmed developers in recent years. The bipartisan sponsorship reflects uncommon alignment on cryptocurrency policy between the two major parties.

The bill currently stands as standalone legislation in the Senate but may be incorporated into broader market structure proposals, according to congressional sources. Negotiations on final legislative packaging continue.

Industry participants have expressed support for clearer distinctions between developers and financial intermediaries, stating the bill could reduce compliance uncertainty and encourage domestic blockchain development. Proponents say the proposal aims to preserve U.S. competitiveness in digital finance by retaining talent and investment.

The legislation does not restrict regulation of cryptocurrency exchanges or brokers. Senator Wyden emphasized that enforcement of tax and trading rules would continue, noting the bill is intended to narrow regulatory scope rather than weaken oversight.

The measure reflects the principle of technology neutrality, with lawmakers stating regulation should focus on function rather than code creation, consistent with previous internet policy approaches.

The bill’s future depends on broader Senate negotiations, but its introduction signals lawmakers’ willingness to update regulatory frameworks for emerging financial technologies.

Market Opportunity
The AI Prophecy Logo
The AI Prophecy Price(ACT)
$0.02494
$0.02494$0.02494
+0.76%
USD
The AI Prophecy (ACT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

WIF price reclaims 200-day moving average

WIF price reclaims 200-day moving average

WIF (WIF) price is entering a critical technical phase as price action reclaims the 200-day moving average, a level that often separates bearish control from bullish
Share
Crypto.news2026/01/13 23:44
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Trump: Powell did a bad job.

Trump: Powell did a bad job.

PANews reported on January 13th that, according to Jinshi Data, US President Trump stated: "Federal Reserve Chairman Powell is either incompetent or dishonest.
Share
PANews2026/01/13 23:40