GOVERNMENT asset recovery efforts will remain operational despite uncertainty over the possible closure of the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI), GOVERNMENT asset recovery efforts will remain operational despite uncertainty over the possible closure of the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI),

Gov’t to continue asset recovery despite possible ICI closure

GOVERNMENT asset recovery efforts will remain operational despite uncertainty over the possible closure of the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI), officials said on Tuesday, as the ICI-Technical Working Group (TWG) resumed its meetings.

ICI Special Adviser and lead investigator Rodolfo S. Azurin, Jr. said the TWG is expected to “survive” regardless of the future structure of the ICI, as inter-agency coordination will remain critical, particularly when cases are referred to the Office of the Ombudsman.

“I think so. Definitely. Because if you look at it, with or without the ICI, when a case is referred to the Ombudsman, it’s like a switch, like a trigger,” Mr. Azurin told a press briefing.

“For the government agencies assisting the ICI, we advise everyone to keep working so that we can deliver the results expected by the public, including the recovered assets that may form part of our investigations,” he added.

Chris Noel A. Bendijo, deputy chief of staff at the Bureau of Customs (BoC), added that the resignation of two commissioners has not affected TWG operations. He credited the systematic and well-defined framework under the chairmanship of Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center Undersecretary Renato “Aboy” A. Paraiso, for ensuring asset recovery work remains “ongoing and functional.”

“Each agency clearly defines its role in asset recovery. Even in the absence of two commissioners at ICI, the work of TWG continues,” Mr. Bendijo said. He also noted that memoranda of agreement among agencies are being finalized, alongside the development of a centralized database and framework agreement to prevent duplication and resolve jurisdictional conflicts.

Mr. Bendijo said the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) has so far frozen P21.2 billion in assets — including bank accounts, e-wallets, insurance policies, motor vehicles, and air assets — linked to the personalities involved in the ongoing flood control investigation.

“To be very clear with the figures, we will create a master list of these assets, including those sold at auction and those subject to forfeiture, such as those currently held by the ICI,” he explained.

Currently, eight vehicles are in the custody of the ICI compound allegedly linked to former lawmaker Elizaldy S. Co. These seized vehicles are also part of asset recovery and ongoing investigations, according to Mr. Azurin.

“Through this detailed search, we may be able to determine whether items were misclassified, misdeclared, or if different import entries were used with varying declarations,” Mr. Bendijo added. “Again that will be determined, that’s ongoing work for now.”

The meeting on Tuesday was attended by representatives from the AMLC, Armed Forces of the Philippines, BoC, Bureau of Immigration, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Department of Justice, Department of Trade and Industry, Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), Office of the Ombudsman, and the Philippine National Police — Criminal Investigation and Detection Group, among others.

In a statement, the ICI said the agencies also discussed the development of the Asset Recovery Coordination and Management Dashboard System, a platform designed to consolidate information on assets subject to recovery, focusing on properties owned by individuals and entities with pending court cases, as well as those referred by the ICI and DPWH.

Agencies with regulatory or supervisory authority over monetary, real estate, and movable assets will be integrated into the dashboard to ensure alignment on frozen or recovered assets. — Erika Mae P. Sinaking

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.010043
$0.010043$0.010043
+0.63%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, has unveiled new goals for the Ethereum blockchain today at the Japan Developer Conference. The plan lays out short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals touching on L2 interoperability and faster responsiveness among others. In terms of technology, he said again that he is sure that Layer 2 options are the best way […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:15