Justin Slaughter said the crypto bill could take years to implement fully.Justin Slaughter said the crypto bill could take years to implement fully.

Paradigm exec says crypto market structure bill may take years to roll out

A senior regulatory affairs executive at Paradigm, a prominent cryptocurrency investment firm, has warned that the long-debated U.S. crypto market structure bill — also referred to by some as the CLARITY Act — could take many years to implement, even if it becomes fully law.

Justin Slaughter, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs at Paradigm, emphasized that the prospect of enactment is only one step in a far longer process. Recent reports have noted that the bill has been referred to the Senate committee stage after securing strong backing from both parties, following continuous talks.

Notably, a markup will be held with the Senate Banking Committee on Thursday of this week. This markup comes at a time when the Senate Agriculture Committee has decided to delay its hearing until Tuesday, January 27. 

Slaughter raises concerns about the current rulemaking process 

Concerning the bill’s fate, sources close to the situation who wished to remain anonymous as the talks were private noted that even if the bill secures approval from both the House of Representatives and the Senate and then the US president signs the bill into law, Slaughter still anticipated that it is likely to take about two presidential terms for the effective implementation of all the rules.

To clarify this point, the sources referenced the crypto policy executive’s recent post on X, in which he stated that “45 rulemakings [are] required in this bill alone,” suggesting that “the process of putting this bill into effect will likely extend beyond this presidential term and probably into the next one.”

Analysts comment on the situation, emphasizing that the crypto industry has been awaiting straightforward regulations from lawmakers for a long time.

Meanwhile, it is worth noting that for a rule to be successfully executed, rulemaking processes require the collaboration of several regulators and agencies assigned to analyze laws that legislators have approved. 

Other activities that can be included in this process include publishing proposed regulations, collecting feedback from the public, and establishing final regulations that are legally effective. Notably, these final regulations require a significant amount of time.

In a statement, Slaughter stated that, “Based on my experience, the Dodd-Frank Act is still not complete today, and most of the rules that aren’t from the CFTC were finalized between 2013 and 2018, which was 3 to 8 years after it was passed.” 

Slaughter claims to be optimistic about the crypto structure bill

Slaughter earlier asserted that it is essential for the crypto market structure bill to be approved before any other rule is established. However, he still insisted that this process is time-consuming.

Regarding the markup scheduled for Thursday, the crypto policy executive mentioned that he will be paying close attention to see if there will be a collaborative approach from both parties or if things might take a different turn. 

Nonetheless, he acknowledged that he had never seen a crucial bill become a law without initially encountering some challenges. Even with this assertion, Slaughter expressed optimism concerning the fate of the crypto market structure bill.

In the meantime, several analysts stated that they agree with Slaughter’s argument that rulemaking is time-consuming. To support this claim, they issued an example of a bill that took time to be implemented as a law. In this example, the analysts claimed that the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was considered a crucial financial reform in the United States. 

It was implemented on July 21, 2010, under the leadership of President Barack Obama, following the significant financial crisis that occurred in 2008. According to their research, agencies took several years to establish rules that ultimately led to positive changes in the market.

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

Market Opportunity
MAY Logo
MAY Price(MAY)
$0.01385
$0.01385$0.01385
+0.50%
USD
MAY (MAY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
Why Is Crypto Up Today? – January 14, 2026

Why Is Crypto Up Today? – January 14, 2026

The crypto market is up today, with the cryptocurrency market capitalisation rising by 3.6% to $3.33 trillion. At the time of writing, 95 of the top 100 coins have
Share
CryptoNews2026/01/14 20:04