Large language models (LLMs) are extraordinary at generating fluent, human-like text, yet they remain constrained by the tendency to hallucinate information. OnceLarge language models (LLMs) are extraordinary at generating fluent, human-like text, yet they remain constrained by the tendency to hallucinate information. Once

Traditional RAG, Agentic RAG and Multi-Agent workflows

Large language models (LLMs) are extraordinary at generating fluent, human-like text, yet they remain constrained by the tendency to hallucinate information. Once trained, they’re frozen in time, unable to access new facts, recall proprietary data or reason about evolving information. 

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a powerful architecture that can improve the factual grounding of LLMs and reduce the problem of hallucination. RAG connects the generative AI model with an external knowledge base that provides more domain specific context and keeps the responses grounded and factual. This is often cheaper than expensive finetuning approaches which involve retraining on domain specific data. RAGs show the promise that they can improve model performance without involving expensive fine-tuning step.

However, traditional RAG based approaches have a limitation that it is still a static pipeline: one query in, one retrieval step, one answer out. It doesn’t reason about what’s missing, it can’t refine its searches, and it doesn’t decide which tools or sources to use. RAGs don’t have access to dynamic real world data where information may be changing constantly and the tasks may require planning. 

Agentic RAG improves on this limitation of traditional RAG based approaches. It reimagines the retrieval process entirely: instead of a passive lookup system, we get an active reasoning agent which is capable of planning, tool use, multi-step retrieval and getting dynamic data from APIs.

In this article, we will deep dive into Traditional RAGs and Agentic RAG. Using industry case studies, we will delineate the key distinctions between these two approaches, establishing guidelines on which one to use for which scenario.

Traditional RAG

Traditional RAG follows a clear static pattern:

  1. A user or system issues a query.
  2. [Retrieval] The system retrieves relevant information from a knowledge base (often via vector search).
  3. [Augmentated] The retrieved information is appended to the prompt for the LLM.
  4. [Generation] The LLM generates an answer with the additional information retrieved

This “retrieve → augment → generate” loop enhances factual accuracy by letting the model use real-world context rather than relying solely on its pretrained weights.

Strengths

  • Fact grounding: Minimizes hallucination by referencing retrieved evidence.
  • Simplicity: Linear, transparent flow which is easy to deploy and maintain.
  • Performance efficiency: Fast and inexpensive for well-defined domains.
  • Reliability: Works well for static or slowly changing corpus.

Limitations

  • Single-pass retrieval: If initial results are incomplete, there’s no self-correction.
  • No reasoning or planning: The system doesn’t decide what else to look for or which sources to query next.
  • Limited flexibility: Tied to one knowledge base and unsuitable for dynamic or multi-source data.

Industry Use cases

  • Internal knowledge assistants: HR or IT chatbots referencing static internal documents.
  • Policy and compliance lookups: Legal or regulatory queries from controlled datasets.
  • Research summarization: Pulling key information from academic or technical papers.

Traditional RAG is highly effective for use cases where questions are specific and context is contained, but it’s less effective when data is fluid or the task requires multi-step reasoning.

Agentic RAG

Agentic RAG builds upon the same retrieval-generation principle but adds autonomy and decision-making through intelligent agents. Instead of a one step retrieval process, it becomes an iterative and goal driven process.

An agent can reason about what information it needs, reformulate queries, call different tools or APIs, and even maintain memory across interactions. In short, it uses RAG as one of several capabilities in a broader planning loop. Here are the core characteristics of an Agentic RAG system : 

  • Iterative retrieval: The agent refines queries until sufficient information is found.
  • Dynamic source selection: It can pull from multiple knowledge stores, APIs and live data feeds.
  • Tool-use and orchestration: The agent can invoke specialized tools (for example, databases, summarizers, or search engines) as needed.
  • Context management: Maintains working memory and long-term state to handle multi-turn or multi-step tasks. Memory allows agents to refer to previous tasks and use that data for future workflows.
  • Planning : They are capable of query routing, step-by-step planning and decision-making.

Advantages

  • Higher flexibility: Capable of handling real-time, evolving data environments.
  • Multi-step reasoning: Solves complex tasks that require planning and synthesis.
  • Reduced hallucinations: Validation loops help ensure factual consistency.

Challenges

  • Increased complexity: Requires orchestration between agents, tools, and memory.
  • Higher cost and latency: Multi-stage reasoning introduces additional computational load per query.
  • Validation: Greater autonomy demands careful monitoring and validation.

Industry Use Cases

  • Customer service orchestration: Intelligent agents retrieve policy data, check CRMs, verify orders, and escalate tickets automatically.
  • Real-time analytics assistants: Systems that integrate with databases, dashboards, and APIs to surface insights and act on triggers.
  • Healthcare and diagnostics: AI systems combining clinical databases, patient data, and recent literature to assist in decision support.
  • Supply chain optimization: Agents pulling from logistics, inventory, and weather APIs to adapt shipping plans dynamically.

These domains demand multi-step reasoning, real-time updates, and flexible handling of data which fits into the Agentic RAG’s use case.

Multi-agent Workflows

Agentic RAG systems naturally evolve into multi-agent workflows as they can contain one or more types of AI Agents. Example AI Agents that can be invoked : 

    • Routing Agent : Routing agents chose which external data sources to invoke to address an incoming user query. Not all queries may need the same set of external calls and routing agents can make the responses smarter by routing to the correct external sources at query time.
  • Query Planning Agent : Query planning agents break down a complex query to subqueries and submit the queries to the right agents for resolution
  • ReAct Agent : Reason and Acting agents can break down a complex task into step by step tasks, delegate it to subagents and then manage the workflow based on the responses of the agents

Traditional vs Agentic RAG Comparison

DimensionNo RAGTraditional RAGAgentic RAG
Retrieval FlowSingle query → generateSingle query → retrieve → generateIterative, multi-step retrieval with refinement
ReasoningNoMinimal; retrieval is reactiveAgent plans, evaluates, and adapts
Knowledge SourcesOnly LLMLLM and One or few static KBsLLM and Multiple dynamic, multimodal sources
HallucinationsUngroundedGrounded on static data from other sourcesGrounded on more real time sources
FlexibilityNoLow; fixed pipelineHigh; real-time and context-aware
Tool UseNoneNoneIntegrated; agents can call tools/APIs
Computational ComplexityLowerLowHigher
LatencyLowerLowHigher
Resource IntensivityLowerLowHigher
Industry Applications Niche areas with specific expert LLMDirect Q&A, knowledge lookupDynamic workflows, decision support, analytics
Market Opportunity
Recall Logo
Recall Price(RECALL)
$0.08703
$0.08703$0.08703
+0.02%
USD
Recall (RECALL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Wormhole launches reserve tying protocol revenue to token

Wormhole launches reserve tying protocol revenue to token

The post Wormhole launches reserve tying protocol revenue to token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Wormhole is changing how its W token works by creating a new reserve designed to hold value for the long term. Announced on Wednesday, the Wormhole Reserve will collect onchain and offchain revenues and other value generated across the protocol and its applications (including Portal) and accumulate them into W, locking the tokens within the reserve. The reserve is part of a broader update called W 2.0. Other changes include a 4% targeted base yield for tokenholders who stake and take part in governance. While staking rewards will vary, Wormhole said active users of ecosystem apps can earn boosted yields through features like Portal Earn. The team stressed that no new tokens are being minted; rewards come from existing supply and protocol revenues, keeping the cap fixed at 10 billion. Wormhole is also overhauling its token release schedule. Instead of releasing large amounts of W at once under the old “cliff” model, the network will shift to steady, bi-weekly unlocks starting October 3, 2025. The aim is to avoid sharp periods of selling pressure and create a more predictable environment for investors. Lockups for some groups, including validators and investors, will extend an additional six months, until October 2028. Core contributor tokens remain under longer contractual time locks. Wormhole launched in 2020 as a cross-chain bridge and now connects more than 40 blockchains. The W token powers governance and staking, with a capped supply of 10 billion. By redirecting fees and revenues into the new reserve, Wormhole is betting that its token can maintain value as demand for moving assets and data between chains grows. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/wormhole-launches-reserve
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:55
XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

Vet has explained that he has decided to veto the Token Escrow amendment to prevent breaking things
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:28
MakinaFi suffered an attack that resulted in the loss of approximately 1299 ETH, with some funds being preemptively processed by MEV.

MakinaFi suffered an attack that resulted in the loss of approximately 1299 ETH, with some funds being preemptively processed by MEV.

PANews reported on January 20th that, according to PeckShieldAlert, the MakinaFi platform was attacked, with hackers stealing approximately 1,299 ETH, worth about
Share
PANews2026/01/20 12:32