The post Top Wall Street Strategist Drops Bitcoin From Portfolio Over Quantum Fears appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Christopher Wood cut Bitcoin exposure toThe post Top Wall Street Strategist Drops Bitcoin From Portfolio Over Quantum Fears appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Christopher Wood cut Bitcoin exposure to

Top Wall Street Strategist Drops Bitcoin From Portfolio Over Quantum Fears

  • Christopher Wood cut Bitcoin exposure to zero, reallocating funds to gold assets.
  • The move was driven by long-term security concerns, not Bitcoin’s price performance.
  • Wood warned that quantum computing could weaken Bitcoin’s cryptography over time.

Christopher Wood, global head of equity strategy at Jefferies, has removed Bitcoin from his long-running “Greed & Fear” model portfolio, citing concerns about the long-term impact of quantum computing on the cryptocurrency’s security.

According to the latest edition of his newsletter, Wood previously held a 10% allocation to Bitcoin in the portfolio. He has now reduced that exposure to zero and reallocated the funds to gold-related assets.

Shift From Bitcoin to Gold

According to Wood, the 10% allocation was split evenly, with 5% moved into physical gold and 5% into gold-mining equities. Following the change, the portfolio now holds about 45% in physical gold and 25% in gold-mining stocks.

This move comes despite Bitcoin’s strong past performance. Bitcoin has risen more than 300% since 2020, but Wood said his decision was driven by concerns about long-term security rather than price action or regulation.

Why Quantum Computing Matters

Bitcoin relies on cryptography to secure wallets and approve transactions. Today’s computers cannot realistically break this system. However, Wood warned that future advances in quantum computing could weaken current encryption methods by making it easier to derive private keys from public data.

Wood said the possibility of cryptographically relevant quantum computers emerging within the next decade or two creates uncertainty for investors with long time horizons, such as pension funds and sovereign wealth managers.

For these investors, even a low-probability risk to the core security of an asset can be enough to challenge its role as a long-term store of value.

Developers Split Over Quantum Computing Risk to Bitcoin

Nic Carter, a partner at Castle Island Ventures, said in a December post on X that many Bitcoin developers are not taking the potential risks from quantum computing seriously.

Carter said there is a clear gap between investors and developers, noting that capital is worried about the issue and looking for solutions, while developers are largely dismissing the risk. He added that this disagreement is already affecting market confidence.

Debate Over Timing and Risk

Not all experts agree on the urgency of the threat. Some developers and researchers argue that quantum risks remain decades away and that Bitcoin could be upgraded to quantum-resistant cryptography well before any real danger appears.

They also said that quantum computing would pose challenges to many digital systems, including banking, government networks, and the broader internet, not just cryptocurrencies.

Related: Crypto Scam? Trove Raises $11.5M, Then Drops Hyperliquid Plans for Solana Launch

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/top-wall-street-strategist-drops-bitcoin-from-portfolio-over-quantum-fears/

Market Opportunity
QUANTUM Logo
QUANTUM Price(QUANTUM)
$0.003446
$0.003446$0.003446
+2.74%
USD
QUANTUM (QUANTUM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Talent Technology Company Cappfinity accelerates growth plans through Chief Talent Management Officer appointment

Talent Technology Company Cappfinity accelerates growth plans through Chief Talent Management Officer appointment

LONDON, Jan. 20, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Cappfinity is pleased to announce the promotion of Stephanie Hopper to the role of Chief Talent Management Officer, marking
Share
AI Journal2026/01/20 15:30
TRX Technical Analysis Jan 20

TRX Technical Analysis Jan 20

The post TRX Technical Analysis Jan 20 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TRX is consolidating at the $0.31 level while showing a short-term bullish tendency
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 15:27