A Hong Kong securities industry group has pushed back against key parts of the city’s proposed regulatory framework for virtual asset management, warning that theA Hong Kong securities industry group has pushed back against key parts of the city’s proposed regulatory framework for virtual asset management, warning that the

Hong Kong Industry Group Pushes Back on Tougher Crypto Manager Rules

  • The HKSFPA objected to proposals that abolished the 10% crypto allocation threshold applicable in Hong Kong for Type 9 managers.
  • The proposed regulations may demand a full license even for limited cryptocurrency involvement.
  • Custody requirements can potentially damage VC and early investor entry into token investment opportunities unless accommodating solutions emerge.

A Hong Kong securities industry group has pushed back against key parts of the city’s proposed regulatory framework for virtual asset management, warning that the plan could discourage traditional asset managers from gaining exposure to cryptocurrencies.

In a Tuesday submission to regulators, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Professionals Association (HKSFPA) criticized proposals that would tighten licensing requirements for portfolio managers. The group argued that the draft rules create an “all-or-nothing” compliance burden that could stop traditional firms from testing crypto exposure through small allocations.

Hong Kong authorities have been consulting the market on additional licensing regimes for virtual asset dealing, advisory, and management services, as the city expands its broader digital asset policy push. Already, regulators have made progress regarding frameworks for virtual asset trading systems and issuers of stablecoins, and now new regulations are emerging regarding fund management and custody activities.

Removal of the 10% threshold draws the sharpest criticism

HKSFPA focused much of its feedback on the plan to remove the existing “de minimis” threshold for managers with a Type 9 license, the SFC registration category covering discretionary portfolio and asset management.

Under current arrangements, Type 9 licensed firms can allocate less than 10% of a fund’s gross asset value to crypto assets without applying for a separate license uplift, as long as they notify the regulator. According to guidance cited by Hong Kong-based law firm JunHe, this approach has allowed traditional asset managers to gain limited crypto exposure while keeping risk and compliance costs in balance.

However, regulators are now proposing to scrap that threshold entirely. Under the updated plan, even a minimal allocation, such as a 1% holding in Bitcoin, would require managers to secure a full virtual asset management license.

HKSFPA called the approach disproportionate. The group warned that it would impose significant compliance costs regardless of actual exposure size, which could deter fund managers from experimenting with crypto as an emerging asset class.

Expanded licensing could widen the regulatory perimeter

JunHe lawyers also highlighted how the proposed framework could significantly expand the scope of firms that fall under licensing requirements.

Some asset managers that run portfolios made up entirely of digital assets do not currently hold Type 9 licenses because their work does not fit neatly into the traditional definition of managing securities portfolios. Under the proposed regime, those firms would also need to obtain a virtual asset management license, which would widen regulatory coverage across crypto-native investment vehicles.

That shift could reshape how Web3 funds operate in Hong Kong, particularly specialist managers that have historically relied on lighter-touch classifications.

Custody rules could disrupt VC and early-stage token investing

HKSFPA also criticized the proposed custody framework. The draft rules would require virtual asset managers to hold client assets only with SFC-licensed custodians.

The association warned that this requirement would create practical issues for private equity and venture capital funds, especially those investing in early-stage or newly issued tokens. Many local custodians do not support these assets during early lifecycle stages, which could block Hong Kong-based funds from participating in Web3 venture deals.

HKSFPA argued that a strict custody mandate could effectively prevent Hong Kong managers from running Web3-focused VC funds, even when investors understand the risks and accept specialist custody approaches.

Meanwhile, the industry organization supported the consideration by regulators of more flexible alternatives, such as permitting self-custody in a limited fashion and allowing the use of qualified offshore custodians when serving professional investors.

Hong Kong balances hub ambitions with tighter supervision

The announcement comes at a time when Hong Kong is increasing its pace to emerge as an Asian leader in the cryptocurrency market. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority has introduced licenses for exchanges, as well as for stablecoin providers.

However, feedback of this kind from the industry, such as what has been seen in HKSFPA’s feedback, shows that what the market desires is regulation commensurate to risk rather than regulation that seeks to haul all crypto-related activity into a costly regulatory orbit. The consultations have brought about a new era of negotiations between policymakers and industry participants.

Highlighted Crypto News:

NYSE Moves Toward 24/7 Markets With Blockchain Trading Venue for Tokenized Equities

Market Opportunity
CyberKongz Logo
CyberKongz Price(KONG)
$0.00135
$0.00135$0.00135
0.00%
USD
CyberKongz (KONG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Bank of Canada cuts rate to 2.5% as tariffs and weak hiring hit economy

Bank of Canada cuts rate to 2.5% as tariffs and weak hiring hit economy

The Bank of Canada lowered its overnight rate to 2.5% on Wednesday, responding to mounting economic damage from US tariffs and a slowdown in hiring. The quarter-point cut was the first since March and met predictions from markets and economists. Governor Tiff Macklem, speaking in Ottawa, said the decision was unanimous. “With a weaker economy […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/17 23:09