Author: BlockSec In May 2025, the Hong Kong police smashed a virtual asset money laundering group worth US$15 million (approximately HK$117 million). The gang mainly split and transferred funds throughAuthor: BlockSec In May 2025, the Hong Kong police smashed a virtual asset money laundering group worth US$15 million (approximately HK$117 million). The gang mainly split and transferred funds through

Hong Kong's OTC regulation evolves three times: from "coin shops" to full regulation

2025/08/08 21:00

Author: BlockSec

In May 2025, the Hong Kong police smashed a virtual asset money laundering group worth US$15 million (approximately HK$117 million). The gang mainly split and transferred funds through the OTC channel in Tsim Sha Tsui.

Earlier, in the JPEX case that shocked Hong Kong, the Commercial Crime Bureau (CCB) revealed that a large amount of funds involved in the case were exchanged and transferred through OTC stores in Hong Kong, becoming an important link in the fraud chain.

In June 2025, the Hong Kong government released the "Legislative Proposal to Regulate Dealing in Virtual Assets," a public consultation document proposing that all virtual asset trading services, including OTC services, be brought under a unified licensing and regulatory framework. While the proposal is still in the consultation phase and has not yet been formalized into legislation, it lays out a clear blueprint for the next steps in Hong Kong's virtual asset regulation—from the early licensing of VATP platforms, to the regulation of cryptocurrency exchanges, and finally to comprehensive coverage of virtual asset dealing services.

To sum it up in one sentence: In three years, Hong Kong's supervision has moved from the OTC "vacuum zone" to full chain supervision.

Phase 1 (2023): VATP will be brought under regulation, but OTC products will slip through the net.

At the end of 2022, Hong Kong passed the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (Amendment) Ordinance, and from June 2023, a licensing system will be implemented for virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs), which will be supervised by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC).

According to the definition of VA exchange:

  • Matching virtual asset transactions between buyers and sellers through electronic facilities;
  • Access to client assets (holding, controlling or arranging custody)

Therefore, the system at the time only targeted the "electronic platform + contact with customer assets" business, and OTC scenarios such as physical currency stores, counters, ATMs, etc. were not included, which led to a regulatory vacuum.

In the second phase (2024), customs licensing will be implemented, and cryptocurrency OTC will also need to be licensed.

From February to April 2024, the Financial Secretary and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) launched the first round of consultation on the "Virtual Asset OTC Trading Services Licensing Regime", bringing physical OTC under regulation for the first time.

Main content:

  • All virtual asset spot trading businesses in Hong Kong (physical or online) must be licensed;
  • The Hong Kong Customs and Excise Department (CCE) is responsible for issuing licenses;
  • Covers USDT, BTC and other fiat currency exchange and transfers;

Phase 3 (2025): OTC will be incorporated into the VASP family and SFC will unify supervision

In June 2025, Hong Kong released the second round of the “Legislative Proposal to Regulate Dealing in Virtual Assets”, which upgraded the scope and depth of supervision:

  • Scope expansion: covering complex services such as block trading, brokerage matching, settlement and exchange, and asset management;
  • Regulatory adjustments: SFC will issue licenses, while HKMA will supervise banking/SVF business;
  • Principle continuity: same business, same risks, same rules;
  • Exemption arrangement: Issuers that only issue/redeem stablecoins in the primary market and have obtained permission from the HKMA are exempt.

Reason for the change: This round of recommendations was developed based on the more than 70 written comments received in the first round of consultation. The government stated in the document that the comments focused on issues such as the high risks of OTC, cross-border money laundering loopholes, and insufficient regulatory coverage. Therefore, the original OTC regulatory recommendations were expanded to a broader "VA Dealing" framework.

Important note: The content of this stage is still in the public consultation stage and has not yet been formally legislated. The final details may be adjusted during the legislative process.

Drivers behind policy changes

The three evolutions of Hong Kong's OTC regulatory policy did not occur in isolation, but were the result of multiple factors. There are at least three core drivers behind this:

Driver 1: Frequent occurrence of major cases exposes regulatory vacuum

In a $15 million money laundering case in May 2025, the ring used OTC (Over-The-Counter) trading platforms to split funds, bypass bank surveillance, and complete multiple cross-border transfers in a short period of time. In the JPEX case, the Commercial Crime Bureau (CCB) discovered that many investors' defrauded funds were exchanged for cash or stablecoins through local OTC shops, and then quickly transferred to overseas wallets.

These cases expose a problem: even if platform supervision is tightened, the anonymity and instant settlement characteristics of offline OTC can still circumvent supervision and become a risk channel for the "last mile".

Driver 2: International regulatory pressure and FATF standards

Since the 2019 update to Recommendation 15, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has explicitly required all jurisdictions to fully integrate virtual asset service providers (VASPs) into their anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) frameworks. While Hong Kong met some FATF requirements when it first introduced VATP licensing, the "leakage" of OTC services has been repeatedly highlighted by international assessment agencies and partners. To maintain Hong Kong's credibility as an international financial center, regulators must address this loophole and ensure the effective implementation of the "same business, same risk, same rules" principle.

If Hong Kong wants to become an international virtual asset center, it must address AML/CFT risks.

Driver 3: Local public opinion drives policy upgrades

During the first round of OTC consultations in 2024, the government received over 70 written public comments from banks, compliance agencies, crypto companies, and law enforcement agencies. Most of the comments highlighted the high risks of anonymous OTC transactions; the difficulty in tracking cross-border capital flows; and the role of OTC as an intermediary in fraud and money laundering cases.

In its VA Dealing legislative proposal released in 2025, the government clearly stated that it was based on these feedbacks that the regulatory scope, which originally only covered OTC exchanges, was expanded to include the more complete VA Dealing full-chain business.

Summarize

Once a hidden gem in Hong Kong's cryptocurrency market, OTC (Over-the-Counter) trading is now being brought into the open. From platform regulation in 2023, to the regulation of cryptocurrency shops in 2024, to the proposed full-chain "VA Dealing" framework in 2025, Hong Kong's virtual asset regulation is becoming more systematic and internationalized. The latest chapter in this process is currently under public consultation, awaiting final legislation.

Market Opportunity
MAY Logo
MAY Price(MAY)
$0.01382
$0.01382$0.01382
+0.29%
USD
MAY (MAY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50