CrediX Finance hack may have actually been an exit scam, as the team abandons the project.CrediX Finance hack may have actually been an exit scam, as the team abandons the project.

Was CrediX an exit scam? Team goes dark after $4.4m exploit

After suffering a $4.4 million exploit, the CrediX Finance team went dark, suggesting a possible exit scam.

Summary
  • CrediX Finance is suspected of being an exit scam after the team deletes website, social media
  • Just days ago, the firm claimed that it had reached a settlement with hackers
  • Users lost $4.4 million in potentially to scammers who run CrediX

After days of false promises following a $4.4 million exploit, the CrediX team has now gone dark. On Friday, August 8, blockchain security firm CertiK noted that the team deleted its X account, while the official website remains offline.

This comes just days after CrediX Finance claimed it was working to recover the stolen funds. On August 5, the team announced that it had reached a deal with the hacker, with an expected return of funds within 24 to 48 hours. However, no funds have been returned, and the team has since ceased all public communication.

Why CrediX might be an exit scam

On August 4, crypto.news reported on the CrediX Finance exploit, which resulted in losses of approximately $4.5 million. At the time, several blockchain security firms pointed to a compromise of CrediX’s multisig admin and bridge wallet as the likely attack vector. While it was initially unclear how the hackers obtained such high-level access, new developments suggest a different possibility.

The deletion of social media accounts and the website follows a known pattern often associated with exit scams. In these scenarios, project teams abruptly abandon their platforms and disappear with user funds.

Exit scammers often delay withdrawals or publish false updates in an attempt to buy time and extract more deposits from users. Once user trust is exhausted, the scammers vanish, leaving no way to recover the lost funds.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50