The post FET Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. FET is approaching critical supports at the 0.15$ level while maintaining its downwardThe post FET Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. FET is approaching critical supports at the 0.15$ level while maintaining its downward

FET Technical Analysis Feb 6

FET is approaching critical supports at the 0.15$ level while maintaining its downward trend dominance; it shows liquidity hunt signals with a 16.68% drop in the last 24 hours, and the oversold RSI (22.55) increases rebound potential.

Current Price Position and Critical Levels

FET is currently positioned around 0.15$ and is in a clear downtrend within the overall market structure. It is trading below EMA20 (0.21$) on the daily timeframe, confirming the short-term bearish bias. The Supertrend indicator is also giving a bearish signal and marking the 0.22$ level as resistance. Multi-timeframe (MTF) analysis detects a total of 8 strong levels across 1D/3D/1W timeframes: 1 support/1 resistance on 1D, 1 support/2 resistances on 3D, 2 supports/2 resistances confluences on 1W. Volume is high at 73M$, but selling pressure dominates; the price is stuck in the recent range between 0.15$-0.18$. This position stands out as a point where buyers are waiting to collect liquidity, as RSI at 22.55 is in the oversold region and preparing the ground for a possible bounce.

Support Levels: Buyer Zones

Primary Support

The most critical support level is 0.1468$ (score: 80/100). This level is defined as a strong order block (OB) on 1D and 3D timeframes; it has been tested 3 times in the past and rejected each time with strong buying volume. It also shows confluence with Fibonacci 0.618 retracement on the 1W timeframe and stands out as a high volume node (HVN) in the daily volume profile. Why is it important? This area is a demand zone where big players (smart money) collect liquidity; when price reaches here, aggressive buying is expected after stop-loss hunts. According to historical data, this level has held with an 85% success rate in the last 6 months; in case of breakdown, it carries a risk of a quick flush.

Secondary Support and Stop Levels

Secondary supports are listed as 0.14$ (1W support confluence) and 0.13$ (3D OB). These are supported by equal lows from monthly lows on the 1W timeframe and are supply/demand zones with observed volume increases. Invalidation level is a break below 0.13$; this point signals a deepening of the downtrend and opens the path to the downside target 0.0171$ (score:22). For stop-loss, below 1% of 0.1468$ is recommended, as this is a liquidity pool with high fakeout risk.

Resistance Levels: Seller Zones

Near-Term Resistances

The near-term primary resistance is 0.1584$ (score: 72/100). This level is the recent swing high on the 1D timeframe and a supply zone near EMA20; it has shown a 70% rejection rate in 4 past tests. It has confluence with volume spikes and fair value gap (FVG), making it an ideal target for short positions. When price approaches here, selling pressure may increase as RSI divergence potential is low.

Main Resistance and Targets

Main resistances are 0.21$ (EMA20 confluence), 0.22$ (Supertrend resistance), and upside target 0.2491$ (score:10). These levels, defined as breaker blocks on 3D and 1W, overlap with weekly pivots; they have been rejected with high selling volume in historical tests. 0.2491$ aligns with 1W Fibonacci extension 1.0 and is a take-profit zone for big players. Volume breakout is required for a break, otherwise rejection and retest are likely.

Liquidity Map and Big Players

The liquidity map shows stop-loss clusters below 0.1468$; big players (whales) can sweep this area for upward manipulation. Above, equal highs between 0.1584$-0.18$ form a liquidity pool, carrying short squeeze potential. Order flow analysis indicates bearish continuation with imbalances (FVGs) on 1D, but oversold conditions can trigger buyers. Volume delta is negative but shows divergence; smart money appears to be accumulating positions in demand zones. Risk/reward ratio (R/R): Upside to 0.2491$ at 1:1.66, downside to 0.0171$ at 1:0.88 – bearish bias dominates.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC is in a downtrend with a 13.87% drop at the 63,049$ level; main supports at 62,345$, 48,392$, and 41,107$. Resistances at 66,554$, 70,763$, 81,850$. BTC with bearish Supertrend is pressuring altcoins like FET – correlation coefficient above 0.85. If BTC breaks below 62,345$, FET may lose 0.1468$; BTC breakout above 66,554$ is required for an upward reaction. Increasing BTC dominance creates additional selling pressure on altcoins, stay cautious.

Trading Plan and Level-Based Strategy

Level-based outlook: Holding above 0.1468$ signals bullish reversal, follow FET Spot Analysis for longs. Short on breakdown, FET Futures Analysis recommended. If near support holds, test 0.1584$, resistance rejection is short setup. Wait for multi-TF confirmation, volume increase is critical. This outlook is not investment advice; apply your own risk management. Potential scenarios: 60% probability support holds (bounce to 0.18$), 40% breakdown (0.13$ test).

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Strategy Analyst: David Kim

Macro market analysis and portfolio management

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/fet-technical-analysis-february-5-2026-support-and-resistance-levels

Market Opportunity
FET Logo
FET Price(FET)
$0.1574
$0.1574$0.1574
+0.44%
USD
FET (FET) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Ultimea Unveils Skywave X100 Dual: 9.2.6 Wireless Home Theater Launching March 2026

Ultimea Unveils Skywave X100 Dual: 9.2.6 Wireless Home Theater Launching March 2026

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, Calif., Feb. 12, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Ultimea, a leader in immersive home entertainment, announces the upcoming launch of its next-generation flagship
Share
AI Journal2026/02/13 02:45
The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Ripple’s RLUSD Now Integrated on Binance XRP

Ripple’s RLUSD Now Integrated on Binance XRP

The post Ripple’s RLUSD Now Integrated on Binance XRP appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Binance completes RLUSD integration on XRP Ledger and opens
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/13 02:24