Why the IOTA Foundation Is Betting Big on USDT Integration
- The IOTA Foundation is focusing on USDT in order to open up stable liquidity in DeFi, trade finance, and tokenized settlement on the network.
- Integration work is in progress, with audits and validation needed because IOTA is non-EVM and Tether standards are strict.
IOTA Foundation has clarified that its current development focus is centered on integrating Tether’s USDT into the IOTA ecosystem. According to statements shared by community contributors, the effort reflects the Foundation’s view that stable liquidity is required before tokenized trade, decentralized finance, and real-world asset workflows can function at scale on the network.
The current infrastructure at IOTA already has data transfer, digital identities, and enterprise applications. There are also products like SALUS and TWIN that run on data exchange, invoicing, and decentralized identifiers. However, these elements do not have a universally accepted settlement property.
Without a stablecoin used in global trade, on-chain financial activity remains limited despite technical readiness. X user Salima explained that USDT has become the core focus for the first quarter because it addresses this gap. She explained that the decision is based on market usage rather than branding or ideology. USDT is already used as a settlement instrument across borders, especially in emerging markets and trade finance, which aligns with IOTA’s objective of supporting production-level tokenized commerce.
After these remarks circulated, discussion followed around why USDT was prioritized over alternatives. Salima responded that the choice was structural. She noted that large-scale trade requires a stable asset that is already liquid and accepted across regions. According to her, onchain money must reflect what markets already use, or liquidity cannot form in practice.
IOTA’s USDT Integration and Broader Network Developments
The integration process itself is described as complex and resource-intensive. Salima observed that Tether needs firm audits and prolonged validation, especially when it comes to non-EVM networks like IOTA. She explained that contracts have been signed and a payment made already, and the final procedures were on audits, validation, and implementation. These steps are termed as gradual but are needed in deployment.
Not everyone is in support. X user Microtruffle cited that several networks adopt USDC because of the uniformity of regulations and bank acceptance, particularly in Europe. According to him, the USDC offered by Circle is closer to MiCA frameworks than USDT.
Some countered this by arguing that regional compliance preferences are diverse around the world, but the global economy largely depends on USDT to settle on-chain transactions outside of small regulatory restrictions.
Others questioned the role of the MIOTA token. In response, Salima stated that USDT is a settlement layer, whereas MIOTA is the token that powers the infrastructure behind the data, interoperability and coordination. The two are complementary and don’t overlap.
IOTA is also pursuing market expansion as part of its 2026 strategy. Salima noted that the network has gained renewed exposure in South Korea, with activity linked to Bithumb Global and appearances at regional industry events. She also stated that a regulated U.S. exchange listing is planned for late February or early March, excluding Coinbase and Robinhood.
However, at press time, the IOTA price was still bearish after failing to breach the resistance, trading at $0.07009, down 5.73%.
]]>You May Also Like
Ultimea Unveils Skywave X100 Dual: 9.2.6 Wireless Home Theater Launching March 2026
The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems
- Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
- Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
- Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
- Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
- Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
- Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
