Elon Musk’s X is challenging the $140 million fine imposed on the platform under the Digital Services Act by the European Union.  The legal challenge targets theElon Musk’s X is challenging the $140 million fine imposed on the platform under the Digital Services Act by the European Union.  The legal challenge targets the

X challenges €120M EU DSA fine in landmark free speech case

2026/02/21 02:03
4 min read

Elon Musk’s X is challenging the $140 million fine imposed on the platform under the Digital Services Act by the European Union. 

The legal challenge targets the European Commission’s concentrated power, claiming that it doesn’t allow for “meaningful checks and balances.” 

The case, titled X v. the European Commission, is of interest to other tech giants like Meta, TikTok, and Google. The DSA governs “Very Large Online Platforms” (VLOPs), so the court’s decision will set a precedent for them. 

What fine is X fighting in court?

The social media platform X (formerly Twitter) has officially filed a legal challenge against the European Union. It is the first company to legally contest a fine imposed under the Digital Services Act (DSA). 

The appeal was filed at the General Court of the European Union in Luxembourg and seeks to overturn a €120 million fine issued by the European Commission in December 2025.

X and its owner, Elon Musk, argue that the European Commission has shown prosecutorial bias. According to the legal filing, X claims the Commission ignored basic due process. 

Under the DSA, the European Commission has the power to write the rules, investigate potential breaches, and then decide the punishment. X argues that this concentration of power leaves no room for “meaningful checks and balances.” 

The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) International also argues that the EU is using the DSA as a “censorship law” to target platforms that support broad free speech. 

In December 2025, the Commission ruled that X had failed to meet transparency and procedural obligations. X denied these claims and instead suggested that the Commission was punishing the platform for refusing to implement content moderation.

X has been involved in a number of scandals regarding its “free speech” policy. A government minister in Spain has publicly discussed the possibility of a countrywide ban on X if the platform does not comply with local “hate speech” regulations. 

Multiple investigations are ongoing regarding X’s role in distributing what authorities call illegal content in the United Kingdom. 

How does Article 40 change online research and privacy?

Roughly €40 million of X’s €120 million fine is tied to Article 40 of the DSA. This article requires platforms to give independent researchers access to data in order to allow experts to study how platforms might contribute to systemic risks, such as those affecting elections or public security.

The Commission’s investigation found that X created several barriers for researchers, including directing them to a “Pro” API tier that cost $5,000 per month, rather than providing free access.

The company rejected researchers who were not based in the EU, even though the law does not require researchers to live within the Union. X’s terms of service also prohibited researchers from using automated tools to gather publicly available data.

The Commission has now clarified that publicly accessible data must be provided to qualified researchers without undue delay and at no cost. This includes allowing researchers to scrape data, provided they are capable of following data security rules. 

The Commission also rejected X’s narrow definition of systemic risk. The company had argued that research must be directly and exclusively about risks within the EU. The Commission ruled that studying global trends, such as election interference in other countries, is relevant to understanding risks within the Union.

X must submit a new plan by mid-April 2026 detailing how X will remove the barriers affecting researchers. 

The U.S. House Judiciary Committee recently released a 160-page report criticizing the EU’s actions. They claim that the DSA is being used to pressure American companies into changing their global moderation rules to fit European standards. 

Alongside the current case, X is under further investigation for allegedly failing to combat false information. This separate investigation could lead to additional fines of up to 6% of the company’s global annual turnover.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Market Opportunity
FreeRossDAO Logo
FreeRossDAO Price(FREE)
$0.00006098
$0.00006098$0.00006098
-2.00%
USD
FreeRossDAO (FREE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Spur Protocol Daily Quiz 21 February 2026: Claim Free Tokens and Boost Your Crypto Wallet

Spur Protocol Daily Quiz 21 February 2026: Claim Free Tokens and Boost Your Crypto Wallet

Spur Protocol Daily Quiz February 21 2026: Today’s Correct Answer and How to Earn Free In-App Tokens The Spur Protocol Daily Quiz for February 21, 2026, is
Share
Hokanews2026/02/21 17:10
SEC Eases Stablecoin Capital Rules

SEC Eases Stablecoin Capital Rules

The post SEC Eases Stablecoin Capital Rules appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Regulations The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission introduced a major shift
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/21 17:01
Crypto phone thefts on the rise in London as thieves drain wallets

Crypto phone thefts on the rise in London as thieves drain wallets

The post Crypto phone thefts on the rise in London as thieves drain wallets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. London sees a spike in phone snatchings targeting crypto holders, with thieves stealing phones to drain wallets. Young men aged 18 to 34 are prime targets, often hit after nights out in places like Old Street. Stolen phones expose passwords and two factor codes, but UK police struggle to track crypto thefts. London is turning into a tough spot for crypto followers with a wave of phone snatchings letting thieves raid digital wallets. According to a report by The Financial Times, earlier this month, a 42 year old guy named Christian D’Ippolito lost almost £40,000 in crypto after four men grabbed his phone near Old Street roundabout on his way home from a night out. They drained his wallet in hours. Rising Street Smarts Behind Crypto Heists This kind of hit is not rare anymore. The London Metropolitan Police report a big jump in street thefts of phones from crypto holders, especially around Old Street and Brixton. Thieves grab the devices to break into wallets and swipe thousands of pounds worth of assets. Young people aged 18 to 34 make up the main targets, with one in four owning crypto and guys most at risk. Thieves spot young men coming back from evenings out, chat them up casually, then snag the phone. They dodge locks, reset Apple IDs, or use crypto apps to move the cash fast. Neil Kotak, another victim, lost £10,000 that way. He said the guys seemed friendly, asked for his number, and grabbed the phone when he logged in. Our heavy use of phones for everything amps up the danger. An open device spills emails, passwords, two factor codes, and even passport pics, handing thieves the keys to your digital life. Crypto moves can be traced, but most crooks get off scot free. UK cops often…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/21 10:57