Rumors around a definitive timeline for the U.S. Crypto Market Structure Bill, often described as a refined successor to FIT21 or the Digital Asset Market Structure Act, have intensified following recent regulatory shifts.
While projections such as a “70% reduction in manipulation” remain industry estimates rather than formal guarantees, the legislative push itself is gathering visible momentum.
The end-of-May target is closely tied to the Congressional calendar. With midterm election campaigns set to accelerate later in 2026, leadership in both the House and Senate is reportedly aiming for what some lawmakers describe as a “Clean Crypto Summer.”
The objective is to finalize market structure clarity before political focus shifts fully toward campaign season. Passing the bill before that transition would provide regulatory certainty during a period when legislative bandwidth narrows significantly.
If enacted, the bill would address several long-standing areas of ambiguity and structural risk in digital asset markets.
It would formally define jurisdiction between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), ending years of enforcement-driven classification disputes. Clear asset taxonomy is intended to reduce volatility caused by regulatory uncertainty.
The legislation would also mandate real-time surveillance standards on exchanges, including anti-wash trading controls similar to those required by traditional equity venues such as the NYSE or NASDAQ.
Another major provision involves the separation of exchange functions. Platforms would be prohibited from acting simultaneously as trading venues, market makers, and lending desks using customer funds, a structural safeguard often described as an “anti-FTX” clause.
Stablecoin transparency requirements are also central to the framework. Issuers would be required to maintain 1:1 backing with high-quality liquid assets, reducing the probability of de-pegging events that have historically triggered broader market instability.
Market expectations vary.
Prediction markets currently assign roughly a 68% probability of passage, reflecting bipartisan backing within Senate committees. Some industry analysts estimate closer to 55%, citing concerns that final wording around stablecoin provisions could delay agreement. Meanwhile, certain lobbying groups place odds near 80%, pointing to strong institutional pressure from major asset managers.
The divergence highlights that while momentum is real, final compromise language remains a variable.
For Bitcoin and Ethereum, passage of the bill would likely represent a structural de-risking event. Although stricter KYC and AML standards could raise compliance costs, clearer regulatory definitions may unlock institutional capital that has remained sidelined due to legal uncertainty.
The broader impact would depend on implementation details. Regulatory clarity historically reduces structural risk premiums but can introduce short-term volatility around announcement periods.
As with many legislative developments, markets may price expectations in advance. Even if the bill passes, price reaction could follow a “buy the rumor, sell the news” dynamic in the short term.
For now, the key variable is timing. If lawmakers reach agreement by late May, the U.S. crypto market could enter the second half of 2026 with its most comprehensive federal framework to date.
The post New Crypto Bill Reportedly Targets Market Manipulation appeared first on ETHNews.


