The post Disney Sues Sling TV Over Day Passes appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In this photo illustration, the Disney Plus logo is seen displayed on a smartphone screen. SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images The Walt Disney Co. is taking Sling TV to court. Deadline reports in an exclusive that the company is suing the Dish Network subsidiary for including its networks in short-term packages. Sling allows users to stream live TV and recently introduced a new pay-TV model for under seven-day bundles. While Sling’s services usually start at $45.99 a month, the new system includes a $4.99 day pass for a 24-hour period, a $9.99 Weekend Pass and a $14.99 7-day pass. However, on Tuesday, August 26, Disney filed a suit with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that Sling did not consult the company about the new system. In the Deadline report, a Disney spokesperson said in a statement, “Sling TV’s new offerings, which they made available without our knowledge or consent, violate the terms of our existing license agreement. We have asked the court to require Dish to comply with our deal when it distributes our programming.” A Sling spokesperson made a statement to Deadline that the company will “vigorously defend our right to bring customers a viewing experience that fits their lives, on their schedule and on their terms.” The packages are radically different from the current streaming landscape. Currently, most companies offer free trial periods. However, after those periods, almost every service charges monthly or yearly. Even the advent of monthly subscriptions breaks from older TV provider models which, in the past, were historically at least yearly. Sling’s new model seems tailored especially to fans of sports and other live televised events. With the upcoming NFL season, the packages may be especially popular. Since Disney is the majority owner of ESPN and offers… The post Disney Sues Sling TV Over Day Passes appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In this photo illustration, the Disney Plus logo is seen displayed on a smartphone screen. SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images The Walt Disney Co. is taking Sling TV to court. Deadline reports in an exclusive that the company is suing the Dish Network subsidiary for including its networks in short-term packages. Sling allows users to stream live TV and recently introduced a new pay-TV model for under seven-day bundles. While Sling’s services usually start at $45.99 a month, the new system includes a $4.99 day pass for a 24-hour period, a $9.99 Weekend Pass and a $14.99 7-day pass. However, on Tuesday, August 26, Disney filed a suit with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that Sling did not consult the company about the new system. In the Deadline report, a Disney spokesperson said in a statement, “Sling TV’s new offerings, which they made available without our knowledge or consent, violate the terms of our existing license agreement. We have asked the court to require Dish to comply with our deal when it distributes our programming.” A Sling spokesperson made a statement to Deadline that the company will “vigorously defend our right to bring customers a viewing experience that fits their lives, on their schedule and on their terms.” The packages are radically different from the current streaming landscape. Currently, most companies offer free trial periods. However, after those periods, almost every service charges monthly or yearly. Even the advent of monthly subscriptions breaks from older TV provider models which, in the past, were historically at least yearly. Sling’s new model seems tailored especially to fans of sports and other live televised events. With the upcoming NFL season, the packages may be especially popular. Since Disney is the majority owner of ESPN and offers…

Disney Sues Sling TV Over Day Passes

2025/08/28 06:19

In this photo illustration, the Disney Plus logo is seen displayed on a smartphone screen.

SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

The Walt Disney Co. is taking Sling TV to court. Deadline reports in an exclusive that the company is suing the Dish Network subsidiary for including its networks in short-term packages.

Sling allows users to stream live TV and recently introduced a new pay-TV model for under seven-day bundles. While Sling’s services usually start at $45.99 a month, the new system includes a $4.99 day pass for a 24-hour period, a $9.99 Weekend Pass and a $14.99 7-day pass. However, on Tuesday, August 26, Disney filed a suit with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that Sling did not consult the company about the new system.

In the Deadline report, a Disney spokesperson said in a statement, “Sling TV’s new offerings, which they made available without our knowledge or consent, violate the terms of our existing license agreement. We have asked the court to require Dish to comply with our deal when it distributes our programming.” A Sling spokesperson made a statement to Deadline that the company will “vigorously defend our right to bring customers a viewing experience that fits their lives, on their schedule and on their terms.”

The packages are radically different from the current streaming landscape. Currently, most companies offer free trial periods. However, after those periods, almost every service charges monthly or yearly. Even the advent of monthly subscriptions breaks from older TV provider models which, in the past, were historically at least yearly.

Sling’s new model seems tailored especially to fans of sports and other live televised events. With the upcoming NFL season, the packages may be especially popular. Since Disney is the majority owner of ESPN and offers a bundle that includes ESPN, how these new Sling bundles will affect sports fans may be especially top of mind. However, it could also award shows or other televised programming for the company.

The TV landscape has been changing in recent years. Streaming services have eclipsed cable TV, especially for younger viewers. Pew reported in 2017 that only around 16% of Americans aged 18-29 subscribed to cable or satellite. While streaming TV options have been growing, that number has likely even fallen further. Even a company like Sling existing points to the gap between a streaming forward market and traditional live TV. These packages may prove popular with younger viewers. However, the possible popularity may also be the issue for Disney.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rosaescandon/2025/08/27/disney-sues-sling-tv-over-day-passes/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

The post U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crime 18 September 2025 | 04:05 A Colorado judge has brought closure to one of the state’s most unusual cryptocurrency scandals, declaring INDXcoin to be a fraudulent operation and ordering its founders, Denver pastor Eli Regalado and his wife Kaitlyn, to repay $3.34 million. The ruling, issued by District Court Judge Heidi L. Kutcher, came nearly two years after the couple persuaded hundreds of people to invest in their token, promising safety and abundance through a Christian-branded platform called the Kingdom Wealth Exchange. The scheme ran between June 2022 and April 2023 and drew in more than 300 participants, many of them members of local church networks. Marketing materials portrayed INDXcoin as a low-risk gateway to prosperity, yet the project unraveled almost immediately. The exchange itself collapsed within 24 hours of launch, wiping out investors’ money. Despite this failure—and despite an auditor’s damning review that gave the system a “0 out of 10” for security—the Regalados kept presenting it as a solid opportunity. Colorado regulators argued that the couple’s faith-based appeal was central to the fraud. Securities Commissioner Tung Chan said the Regalados “dressed an old scam in new technology” and used their standing within the Christian community to convince people who had little knowledge of crypto. For him, the case illustrates how modern digital assets can be exploited to replicate classic Ponzi-style tactics under a different name. Court filings revealed where much of the money ended up: luxury goods, vacations, jewelry, a Range Rover, high-end clothing, and even dental procedures. In a video that drew worldwide attention earlier this year, Eli Regalado admitted the funds had been spent, explaining that a portion went to taxes while the remainder was used for a home renovation he claimed was divinely inspired. The judgment not only confirms that INDXcoin qualifies as a…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:14