The post Lisa Cook Sues Trump Over Federal Reserve Firing appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook sued President Donald Trump in federal court on Thursday, court records show, launching what’s expected to be a significant court battle to determine to what extent the president can exert control over the nation’s central bank. Lisa Cook is sworn in during a Senate Banking nominations hearing on June 21, 2023 in Washington, DC. Getty Images Key Facts Cook filed a lawsuit against Trump on Thursday in federal court, taking aim at the president’s allegedly “unprecedented and illegal attempt” to remove her from the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors and argued he fired her because of his desire to exert control over the Federal Reserve. Trump said Monday night he was firing Cook, citing alleged issues with her mortgage agreements, a decision that came after the president has long railed publicly against the Federal Reserve and chair Jerome Powell for not lowering interest rates. Cook has protested her firing and refused to leave the Federal Reserve, however, arguing Trump does not have the legal authority to fire her, and her attorney Abbe Lowell had said Tuesday that a lawsuit against Trump was coming. Federal law allows the president to fire members of the Federal Governor’s board, but only “for cause,” which is not specifically defined in the law, but traditionally refers to some kind of gross misconduct on the job. Cook alleged in her lawsuit that Trump’s “unsubstantiated allegation about private mortgage applications” are not sufficient “cause” for firing under the law and are just a “pretext” to fire her so he can appoint a replacement, also arguing the president violated her rights to due process and the chance to have a hearing where she could defend herself. Members of the board can only be fired in “instances of inefficiency, neglect of duty, malfeasance… The post Lisa Cook Sues Trump Over Federal Reserve Firing appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook sued President Donald Trump in federal court on Thursday, court records show, launching what’s expected to be a significant court battle to determine to what extent the president can exert control over the nation’s central bank. Lisa Cook is sworn in during a Senate Banking nominations hearing on June 21, 2023 in Washington, DC. Getty Images Key Facts Cook filed a lawsuit against Trump on Thursday in federal court, taking aim at the president’s allegedly “unprecedented and illegal attempt” to remove her from the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors and argued he fired her because of his desire to exert control over the Federal Reserve. Trump said Monday night he was firing Cook, citing alleged issues with her mortgage agreements, a decision that came after the president has long railed publicly against the Federal Reserve and chair Jerome Powell for not lowering interest rates. Cook has protested her firing and refused to leave the Federal Reserve, however, arguing Trump does not have the legal authority to fire her, and her attorney Abbe Lowell had said Tuesday that a lawsuit against Trump was coming. Federal law allows the president to fire members of the Federal Governor’s board, but only “for cause,” which is not specifically defined in the law, but traditionally refers to some kind of gross misconduct on the job. Cook alleged in her lawsuit that Trump’s “unsubstantiated allegation about private mortgage applications” are not sufficient “cause” for firing under the law and are just a “pretext” to fire her so he can appoint a replacement, also arguing the president violated her rights to due process and the chance to have a hearing where she could defend herself. Members of the board can only be fired in “instances of inefficiency, neglect of duty, malfeasance…

Lisa Cook Sues Trump Over Federal Reserve Firing

Topline

Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook sued President Donald Trump in federal court on Thursday, court records show, launching what’s expected to be a significant court battle to determine to what extent the president can exert control over the nation’s central bank.

Lisa Cook is sworn in during a Senate Banking nominations hearing on June 21, 2023 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images

Key Facts

Cook filed a lawsuit against Trump on Thursday in federal court, taking aim at the president’s allegedly “unprecedented and illegal attempt” to remove her from the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors and argued he fired her because of his desire to exert control over the Federal Reserve.

Trump said Monday night he was firing Cook, citing alleged issues with her mortgage agreements, a decision that came after the president has long railed publicly against the Federal Reserve and chair Jerome Powell for not lowering interest rates.

Cook has protested her firing and refused to leave the Federal Reserve, however, arguing Trump does not have the legal authority to fire her, and her attorney Abbe Lowell had said Tuesday that a lawsuit against Trump was coming.

Federal law allows the president to fire members of the Federal Governor’s board, but only “for cause,” which is not specifically defined in the law, but traditionally refers to some kind of gross misconduct on the job.

Cook alleged in her lawsuit that Trump’s “unsubstantiated allegation about private mortgage applications” are not sufficient “cause” for firing under the law and are just a “pretext” to fire her so he can appoint a replacement, also arguing the president violated her rights to due process and the chance to have a hearing where she could defend herself.

Members of the board can only be fired in “instances of inefficiency, neglect of duty, malfeasance in office, or comparable misconduct,” Cook alleged, citing Supreme Court precedent on the issue, and argued she cannot be fired based on “a specious assertion that a one ‘potentially’ committed a crime—one which is unproven, uncharged, and unrelated to official conduct.”

Crucial Quote

“President Trump’s conception of ‘cause’ … would allow him to remove any Federal Reserve Board member with whom he disagrees about policy based on chalked up allegations,” Cook’s lawsuit argues. “That the President says he has found (or created) some basis for removing a Governor does not magically make such a basis grounds for a “for cause” removal under the [Federal Reserve Act].”

Chief Critic

In a statement to Forbes on Thursday, White House spokesperson Kush Desai said Trump had “exercised his lawful authority to remove a governor on the Federal Board of Governors for cause” and “determined there was cause to remove a governor who was credibly accused of lying in financial documents from a highly sensitive position overseeing financial institutions.” Removing Cook “for cause improves the Federal Reserve Board’s accountability and credibility for both the markets and American people,” Desai added. Trump has previously also defended his decision to fire Cook. “She seems to have had an infraction, and she can’t have an infraction,” Trump said at a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday when asked about her firing. “Especially that infraction because she’s in charge of, if you think about it, mortgages, and we need people that are 100 percent above-board, and it doesn’t seem like she was.”

What To Watch For

Cook’s lawsuit asks for the court to declare Trump’s firing of Cook is null and void and that she is still a member of the Federal Reserve’s board. It also asks for the court to bar the Federal Reserve from taking any action against Cook in response to Trump’s letter firing her, and for a declaration that Trump’s attempted termination was unlawful and violated her rights. It’s unclear how long the legal dispute could take to play out, though it’s widely expected it could reach the Supreme Court.

Will Courts Uphold Lisa Cook’s Firing?

It’s unclear. Since the Federal Reserve Act doesn’t specifically define what “for cause” means when it comes to the president being able to fire governors, legal experts have said Trump’s firing falls within a legal grey area that makes it difficult to know what the courts could do. Many legal experts have argued the firing doesn’t constitute “cause” under the law, citing the fact that Cook didn’t have any ability to defend herself before she was fired and that the alleged false disclosures took place prior to her joining the board and are totally separate from her work for the Fed. That being said, it remains to be seen how the 6-3 conservative Supreme Court could rule. The court’s conservative majority has so far been pretty permissive when it comes to Trump firing members of traditionally independent boards, clearing the way in May for him to fire a member of the National Labor Relations Board and a member of the Merit Systems Protection Board. Justices said in that ruling that their reasoning allowing the firings did not apply to the Federal Reserve, however, which they said is “a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity that follows in the distinct historical tradition of the First and Second Banks of the United States.”

What Are The Mortgage Allegations Against Lisa Cook?

Trump’s decision to fire Cook is based on allegations that she listed two residences as both being her “primary” residence on mortgage documents. The alleged disclosures took place in 2021, prior to her being appointed to the Federal Reserve in 2022, and, if true, may have allowed her to secure a lower mortgage rate, as rates are typically lower for primary residences than for vacation or investment properties. Bill Pulte, Trump’s director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, first made the allegations against Cook in a letter last week, kicking off the controversy that led to Trump’s termination decision. Experts have said there’s no clear evidence of wrongdoing by Cook at this point, however, and Pulte has not given sufficient information to conclude that Cook committed fraud. In order to be found guilty of fraud, Cook would have had to not only write false information on her mortgage agreement, but also have done so knowing that her statements were fraudulent. Cook has so far not responded substantially to the allegations, saying only that she takes “any questions about my financial history seriously as a member of the Federal Reserve, and so I am gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and provide the facts.”

Why Does Firing Lisa Cook Matter?

Trump’s decision to fire cook comes after the president has publicly railed against the Federal Reserve for months, attacking the bank and Powell for refusing to lower interest rates as the president wants. The Federal Reserve has long been viewed as an independent institution free from political influence, and this independence is considered to be essential for the health of the nation’s economy. By firing Powell, whose term isn’t set to end until 2038, Trump would be able to replace her with a new board member who would be willing to do the president’s bidding and have a majority of the Fed board be made up of his appointees.

Further Reading

ForbesCan Trump Fire Lisa Cook? Here’s Why President’s Fed Move Is Legally UnclearForbesTrump Says He Is Firing Fed Governor Lisa Cook—She Says President Lacks Authority To Do So

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/08/28/fed-governor-lisa-cook-sues-trump-over-firing/

Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$3.407
$3.407$3.407
+1.12%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

XRP Volume Rises 212%, Bitcoin ETFs Back in Demand With $506 Million, Dogecoin Price Reclaims $0.10 — U.Today Crypto Digest

XRP Volume Rises 212%, Bitcoin ETFs Back in Demand With $506 Million, Dogecoin Price Reclaims $0.10 — U.Today Crypto Digest

Crypto news digest: 212% increase was seen in XRP volume; BTC ETFs have recovered from the low capital; DOGE price jumps 8%.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/28 05:27
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00
Pi Network Fast-Track KYC Lets New Users Unlock Mainnet Wallets Early

Pi Network Fast-Track KYC Lets New Users Unlock Mainnet Wallets Early

TLDR: Pi Network introduces AI-powered Fast Track KYC to speed wallet activation for new users and non-users Users can activate Mainnet wallets before 30 mining sessions but cannot migrate mined balances yet Fast Track KYC maintains strict verification standards and may be more conservative than standard KYC Pi Network reports over 14.82M users fully KYC-verified [...] The post Pi Network Fast-Track KYC Lets New Users Unlock Mainnet Wallets Early appeared first on Blockonomi.
Share
Blockonomi2025/09/19 15:48