TLDRs: Google reduces small-team managers by 35% to cut bureaucracy and improve efficiency. Many affected managers remain as individual contributors after restructuring. Voluntary buyouts replace traditional layoffs, boosting employee satisfaction. Google emphasizes engineering-focused, flat structures to stay competitive in AI. Google has reduced the number of managers overseeing small teams by approximately 35% over the [...] The post Google Cuts Over a Third of Managers Leading Small Teams appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDRs: Google reduces small-team managers by 35% to cut bureaucracy and improve efficiency. Many affected managers remain as individual contributors after restructuring. Voluntary buyouts replace traditional layoffs, boosting employee satisfaction. Google emphasizes engineering-focused, flat structures to stay competitive in AI. Google has reduced the number of managers overseeing small teams by approximately 35% over the [...] The post Google Cuts Over a Third of Managers Leading Small Teams appeared first on CoinCentral.

Google Cuts Over a Third of Managers Leading Small Teams

2025/08/29 01:22
3 min read

TLDRs:

  • Google reduces small-team managers by 35% to cut bureaucracy and improve efficiency.
  • Many affected managers remain as individual contributors after restructuring.
  • Voluntary buyouts replace traditional layoffs, boosting employee satisfaction.
  • Google emphasizes engineering-focused, flat structures to stay competitive in AI.

Google has reduced the number of managers overseeing small teams by approximately 35% over the past year, a company executive revealed during a recent all-hands meeting.

This move is part of a broader effort to streamline operations, cut unnecessary bureaucracy, and improve overall organizational efficiency. Many of the managers impacted by the restructuring will continue to contribute to projects as individual contributors rather than leave the company entirely.

The reduction specifically targets managers supervising fewer than three employees, highlighting Google’s intention to eliminate micro-management roles and empower team members to take greater ownership of their work. By scaling back layers of management, Google hopes to foster an environment that encourages innovation and quick decision-making, harkening back to its early startup roots.

Returning to Anti-Bureaucracy Roots

The cuts mark a significant return to Google’s original skepticism toward traditional management structures. A decade ago, Google was widely recognized for its engineering-centric approach, favoring flat hierarchies over layers of managerial oversight. This structure encouraged creativity and rapid innovation in the company’s early years.

As Google expanded into a global tech powerhouse, management layers gradually increased, sometimes creating slower decision-making processes.

The recent reduction in small-team managers signals a deliberate shift back to the company’s foundational philosophy, particularly as competition in artificial intelligence intensifies. Company executives believe that a flatter, more agile structure provides a competitive edge in the fast-moving AI landscape.

Voluntary Buyouts Over Layoffs

Rather than implementing mass layoffs, Google has turned to “Voluntary Exit Program” buyouts as a key workforce management strategy.

Ten product areas, including search, advertising, hardware, and people operations, offered buyouts to U.S.-based employees. Acceptance rates ranged from 3% to 5%, suggesting that employees are opting into the program willingly, often citing a desire for career breaks.

This voluntary approach reflects feedback from Google’s January 2023 layoffs, where 12,000 employees, roughly 6% of the workforce, were affected. By giving employees agency in their exit decisions, Google is reducing the negative morale often associated with traditional layoffs while also creating smoother transitions in affected teams.

CEO Sundar Pichai noted that the program required significant effort but emphasized that it provides employees with choice and control over their career paths.

Maintaining Competitive Benefits

Despite these workforce adjustments, Google has clarified that it has no plans to introduce a paid sabbatical policy similar to Meta’s “recharge” program. The company maintains that its existing leave policies are competitive and supportive of employee needs.

Executives suggest that the combination of reduced management layers and voluntary exit options will allow Google to maintain a strong, motivated workforce while also positioning the company for more agile competition in emerging technologies like AI. By focusing on an engineering-first structure and eliminating micro-management, Google is signaling a renewed commitment to its core innovation philosophy while navigating the challenges of a growing global tech landscape.

The post Google Cuts Over a Third of Managers Leading Small Teams appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Volume Rises 212%, Bitcoin ETFs Back in Demand With $506 Million, Dogecoin Price Reclaims $0.10 — U.Today Crypto Digest

XRP Volume Rises 212%, Bitcoin ETFs Back in Demand With $506 Million, Dogecoin Price Reclaims $0.10 — U.Today Crypto Digest

Crypto news digest: 212% increase was seen in XRP volume; BTC ETFs have recovered from the low capital; DOGE price jumps 8%.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/28 05:27
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00
Pi Network Fast-Track KYC Lets New Users Unlock Mainnet Wallets Early

Pi Network Fast-Track KYC Lets New Users Unlock Mainnet Wallets Early

TLDR: Pi Network introduces AI-powered Fast Track KYC to speed wallet activation for new users and non-users Users can activate Mainnet wallets before 30 mining sessions but cannot migrate mined balances yet Fast Track KYC maintains strict verification standards and may be more conservative than standard KYC Pi Network reports over 14.82M users fully KYC-verified [...] The post Pi Network Fast-Track KYC Lets New Users Unlock Mainnet Wallets Early appeared first on Blockonomi.
Share
Blockonomi2025/09/19 15:48