TLDRs: Meituan revenue rises 11.7% but profit falls nearly 97% amid delivery price war. Increased costs, courier incentives, and marketing spend drive Q2 earnings slump. Competition with Alibaba and JD.com pressures margins across local commerce operations. JD.com’s full-time rider model challenges Meituan’s gig economy approach in China. Meituan, the Beijing-based food delivery and local commerce [...] The post Meituan (3690.HK) Stock; Plunges 12% Despite 11.7% Revenue Rise appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDRs: Meituan revenue rises 11.7% but profit falls nearly 97% amid delivery price war. Increased costs, courier incentives, and marketing spend drive Q2 earnings slump. Competition with Alibaba and JD.com pressures margins across local commerce operations. JD.com’s full-time rider model challenges Meituan’s gig economy approach in China. Meituan, the Beijing-based food delivery and local commerce [...] The post Meituan (3690.HK) Stock; Plunges 12% Despite 11.7% Revenue Rise appeared first on CoinCentral.

Meituan (3690.HK) Stock; Plunges 12% Despite 11.7% Revenue Rise

2025/08/29 02:37
3 min read

TLDRs:

  • Meituan revenue rises 11.7% but profit falls nearly 97% amid delivery price war.
  • Increased costs, courier incentives, and marketing spend drive Q2 earnings slump.
  • Competition with Alibaba and JD.com pressures margins across local commerce operations.
  • JD.com’s full-time rider model challenges Meituan’s gig economy approach in China.

Meituan, the Beijing-based food delivery and local commerce giant, saw its stock drop 12.55% following the release of its Q2 2025 results, despite posting a year-on-year revenue increase of 11.7% to 91.8 billion yuan (US$12.8 billion).

Analysts had expected stronger revenue growth, and the disappointing earnings report sent investors sharply lower.

Net profit fell 96.8% to 365.3 million yuan (US$51 million), while adjusted net profit declined 89% to 1.5 billion yuan (US$209.7 million). Operating profit from Meituan’s local commerce segment decreased 75.6% to 3.7 billion yuan (US$517 million), with the operating margin dropping to 5.7%.

Meituan (3690.HK)

Costs and Competition Squeeze Margins

The company attributed the profit decline to several factors, including a 27% increase in cost of revenue, higher courier incentives, and rising delivery transaction volumes.

Meituan also expanded its grocery and overseas operations while boosting research and development spending by 17.2% and marketing expenses by 51.8%.

The financial pressure is compounded by intense competition from Alibaba’s Ele.me and JD.com. While Meituan and Ele.me continue to rely largely on gig-economy freelance riders, JD.com has taken a different path, hiring 150,000 full-time delivery riders to ensure service consistency and customer satisfaction.

Rival Strategies Intensify Market Battle

JD.com’s full-time employment model presents a stark contrast to Meituan’s gig-driven operations. JD.com has reported 25 million daily food orders using full-time staff, while Meituan processes 90 million orders daily via gig workers.

The divergence highlights how market disruption in mature sectors is not only a matter of pricing but also operational philosophy.

Investors are watching closely as the $37 billion Chinese food delivery market becomes increasingly capital-intensive. Both companies face high operational costs, yet late entrants like JD.com must spend disproportionately more to compete effectively, compressing margins across the sector.

Strategic Investments and Market Dynamics

Despite the challenges, Meituan remains the market leader, holding a 69% share of China’s food delivery sector. Its position demonstrates that even substantial financial outlays by competitors may not guarantee significant market share shifts.

However, the steep profit decline signals that sustaining growth in this mature market requires careful cost management and operational innovation.

The latest earnings report underscores broader lessons for investors and businesses: aggressive expansion in competitive sectors often comes at the expense of profitability, and diverse operational strategies can redefine market dynamics even when revenue growth continues.

Conclusion

Meituan’s Q2 results reveal the difficulties of maintaining profitability amid heightened competition and rising costs. While revenue growth signals continued consumer demand, the stock’s 12% drop reflects investor concern over margin compression and operational pressures.

Moving forward, the company’s ability to balance cost management, strategic investments, and competitive positioning will be critical in sustaining long-term performance.cation.

The post Meituan (3690.HK) Stock; Plunges 12% Despite 11.7% Revenue Rise appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
RISE Logo
RISE Price(RISE)
$0.003179
$0.003179$0.003179
-1.85%
USD
RISE (RISE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Volume Rises 212%, Bitcoin ETFs Back in Demand With $506 Million, Dogecoin Price Reclaims $0.10 — U.Today Crypto Digest

XRP Volume Rises 212%, Bitcoin ETFs Back in Demand With $506 Million, Dogecoin Price Reclaims $0.10 — U.Today Crypto Digest

Crypto news digest: 212% increase was seen in XRP volume; BTC ETFs have recovered from the low capital; DOGE price jumps 8%.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/28 05:27
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00
Pi Network Fast-Track KYC Lets New Users Unlock Mainnet Wallets Early

Pi Network Fast-Track KYC Lets New Users Unlock Mainnet Wallets Early

TLDR: Pi Network introduces AI-powered Fast Track KYC to speed wallet activation for new users and non-users Users can activate Mainnet wallets before 30 mining sessions but cannot migrate mined balances yet Fast Track KYC maintains strict verification standards and may be more conservative than standard KYC Pi Network reports over 14.82M users fully KYC-verified [...] The post Pi Network Fast-Track KYC Lets New Users Unlock Mainnet Wallets Early appeared first on Blockonomi.
Share
Blockonomi2025/09/19 15:48