To the dismay of many in the XRP community, the U.S. government has adopted Chainlink for its proposed blockchain integration. The decision has left many questioning why the XRP Ledger was overlooked in such a pivotal collaboration at the highest level. Meanwhile, a recent analysis by community member RippleXity has shed light on why the U.S. Department of Commerce may have turned to Chainlink rather than the XRP Ledger to bring macroeconomic data such as GDP and inflation on-chain. Different Missions in Blockchain The explanation highlights that the two networks are not in direct competition. Instead, they serve very different purposes within the blockchain ecosystem. The XRP Ledger, created in 2012, functions as a Layer 1 blockchain focused on value transfer, liquidity, and settlement. On the other hand, Chainlink is not a blockchain but an oracle network that specializes in connecting real-world data with decentralized applications. While the XRP Ledger facilitates efficient money movement across borders, Chainlink provides trusted data for smart contracts. The U.S. government’s choice to work with Chainlink is due to its need for a reliable system to broadcast macroeconomic data across multiple blockchains. Chainlink’s chain-agnostic design makes it well-suited to this role. The collaboration is not about moving value or enabling payments but about ensuring that information, such as GDP and inflation figures, can be securely and universally accessed by blockchain applications. RippleXity stressed that this use case simply falls outside the scope of the XRP Ledger. The ledger excels at instant settlement, tokenization, and low-cost cross-border payments. However, it is not designed to serve as a data oracle. XRP Ledger and Chainlink Play Complementary Roles Far from being a setback for Ripple or the XRP Ledger, RippleXity argues that the partnership between the U.S. government and Chainlink actually reinforces Ripple’s vision. Chainlink handles the data layer, while the XRP Ledger provides the liquidity layer. Together, they represent essential components of the financial infrastructure needed for mass blockchain adoption. Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin already integrates Chainlink’s data standards following a partnership between Ripple and Chainlink in January. This shows that the two projects are not rivals but rather parts of the same growing ecosystem. The move highlights how the broader financial stack is coming together, with different technologies filling specific but complementary roles. https://twitter.com/RippleXity/status/1961116568798335353 Interoperability is Essential for Mass Adoption: Ripple CTO As Ripple CTO David Schwartz has often emphasized, interoperability will be crucial for the future of blockchain adoption. By delivering data, Chainlink plays a role that supports the systems Ripple is building for payments and liquidity. According to RippleXity, the U.S. government’s decision is not a rejection of the XRP Ledger. Instead, it is a sign that the blockchain space is maturing into a layered infrastructure, where different players solve different problems while working toward the same goal of a more connected global financial system.To the dismay of many in the XRP community, the U.S. government has adopted Chainlink for its proposed blockchain integration. The decision has left many questioning why the XRP Ledger was overlooked in such a pivotal collaboration at the highest level. Meanwhile, a recent analysis by community member RippleXity has shed light on why the U.S. Department of Commerce may have turned to Chainlink rather than the XRP Ledger to bring macroeconomic data such as GDP and inflation on-chain. Different Missions in Blockchain The explanation highlights that the two networks are not in direct competition. Instead, they serve very different purposes within the blockchain ecosystem. The XRP Ledger, created in 2012, functions as a Layer 1 blockchain focused on value transfer, liquidity, and settlement. On the other hand, Chainlink is not a blockchain but an oracle network that specializes in connecting real-world data with decentralized applications. While the XRP Ledger facilitates efficient money movement across borders, Chainlink provides trusted data for smart contracts. The U.S. government’s choice to work with Chainlink is due to its need for a reliable system to broadcast macroeconomic data across multiple blockchains. Chainlink’s chain-agnostic design makes it well-suited to this role. The collaboration is not about moving value or enabling payments but about ensuring that information, such as GDP and inflation figures, can be securely and universally accessed by blockchain applications. RippleXity stressed that this use case simply falls outside the scope of the XRP Ledger. The ledger excels at instant settlement, tokenization, and low-cost cross-border payments. However, it is not designed to serve as a data oracle. XRP Ledger and Chainlink Play Complementary Roles Far from being a setback for Ripple or the XRP Ledger, RippleXity argues that the partnership between the U.S. government and Chainlink actually reinforces Ripple’s vision. Chainlink handles the data layer, while the XRP Ledger provides the liquidity layer. Together, they represent essential components of the financial infrastructure needed for mass blockchain adoption. Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin already integrates Chainlink’s data standards following a partnership between Ripple and Chainlink in January. This shows that the two projects are not rivals but rather parts of the same growing ecosystem. The move highlights how the broader financial stack is coming together, with different technologies filling specific but complementary roles. https://twitter.com/RippleXity/status/1961116568798335353 Interoperability is Essential for Mass Adoption: Ripple CTO As Ripple CTO David Schwartz has often emphasized, interoperability will be crucial for the future of blockchain adoption. By delivering data, Chainlink plays a role that supports the systems Ripple is building for payments and liquidity. According to RippleXity, the U.S. government’s decision is not a rejection of the XRP Ledger. Instead, it is a sign that the blockchain space is maturing into a layered infrastructure, where different players solve different problems while working toward the same goal of a more connected global financial system.

Here’s Why the US Government Chose Chainlink Over the XRP Ledger to Bring Economic Data On-Chain

To the dismay of many in the XRP community, the U.S. government has adopted Chainlink for its proposed blockchain integration. The decision has left many questioning why the XRP Ledger was overlooked in such a pivotal collaboration at the highest level. Meanwhile, a recent analysis by community member RippleXity has shed light on why the U.S. Department of Commerce may have turned to Chainlink rather than the XRP Ledger to bring macroeconomic data such as GDP and inflation on-chain. Different Missions in Blockchain The explanation highlights that the two networks are not in direct competition. Instead, they serve very different purposes within the blockchain ecosystem. The XRP Ledger, created in 2012, functions as a Layer 1 blockchain focused on value transfer, liquidity, and settlement. On the other hand, Chainlink is not a blockchain but an oracle network that specializes in connecting real-world data with decentralized applications. While the XRP Ledger facilitates efficient money movement across borders, Chainlink provides trusted data for smart contracts. The U.S. government’s choice to work with Chainlink is due to its need for a reliable system to broadcast macroeconomic data across multiple blockchains. Chainlink’s chain-agnostic design makes it well-suited to this role. The collaboration is not about moving value or enabling payments but about ensuring that information, such as GDP and inflation figures, can be securely and universally accessed by blockchain applications. RippleXity stressed that this use case simply falls outside the scope of the XRP Ledger. The ledger excels at instant settlement, tokenization, and low-cost cross-border payments. However, it is not designed to serve as a data oracle. XRP Ledger and Chainlink Play Complementary Roles Far from being a setback for Ripple or the XRP Ledger, RippleXity argues that the partnership between the U.S. government and Chainlink actually reinforces Ripple’s vision. Chainlink handles the data layer, while the XRP Ledger provides the liquidity layer. Together, they represent essential components of the financial infrastructure needed for mass blockchain adoption. Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin already integrates Chainlink’s data standards following a partnership between Ripple and Chainlink in January. This shows that the two projects are not rivals but rather parts of the same growing ecosystem. The move highlights how the broader financial stack is coming together, with different technologies filling specific but complementary roles. https://twitter.com/RippleXity/status/1961116568798335353 Interoperability is Essential for Mass Adoption: Ripple CTO As Ripple CTO David Schwartz has often emphasized, interoperability will be crucial for the future of blockchain adoption. By delivering data, Chainlink plays a role that supports the systems Ripple is building for payments and liquidity. According to RippleXity, the U.S. government’s decision is not a rejection of the XRP Ledger. Instead, it is a sign that the blockchain space is maturing into a layered infrastructure, where different players solve different problems while working toward the same goal of a more connected global financial system.

Market Opportunity
RealLink Logo
RealLink Price(REAL)
$0.0508
$0.0508$0.0508
-2.83%
USD
RealLink (REAL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, has unveiled new goals for the Ethereum blockchain today at the Japan Developer Conference. The plan lays out short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals touching on L2 interoperability and faster responsiveness among others. In terms of technology, he said again that he is sure that Layer 2 options are the best way […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:15
Ray Data and Docling Tackle Enterprise AI’s Biggest Pain Point

Ray Data and Docling Tackle Enterprise AI’s Biggest Pain Point

The post Ray Data and Docling Tackle Enterprise AI’s Biggest Pain Point appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Zach Anderson Feb 27, 2026 16:58 New integration
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/28 12:33
3 Paradoxes of Altcoin Season in September

3 Paradoxes of Altcoin Season in September

The post 3 Paradoxes of Altcoin Season in September appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Analyses and data indicate that the crypto market is experiencing its most active altcoin season since early 2025, with many altcoins outperforming Bitcoin. However, behind this excitement lies a paradox. Most retail investors remain uneasy as their portfolios show little to no profit. This article outlines the main reasons behind this situation. Altcoin Market Cap Rises but Dominance Shrinks Sponsored TradingView data shows that the TOTAL3 market cap (excluding BTC and ETH) reached a new high of over $1.1 trillion in September. Yet the share of OTHERS (excluding the top 10) has declined since 2022, now standing at just 8%. OTHERS Dominance And TOTAL3 Capitalization. Source: TradingView. In past cycles, such as 2017 and 2021, TOTAL3 and OTHERS.D rose together. That trend reflected capital flowing not only into large-cap altcoins but also into mid-cap and low-cap ones. The current divergence shows that capital is concentrated in stablecoins and a handful of top-10 altcoins such as SOL, XRP, BNB, DOG, HYPE, and LINK. Smaller altcoins receive far less liquidity, making it hard for their prices to return to levels where investors previously bought. This creates a situation where only a few win while most face losses. Retail investors also tend to diversify across many coins instead of adding size to top altcoins. That explains why many portfolios remain stagnant despite a broader market rally. Sponsored “Position sizing is everything. Many people hold 25–30 tokens at once. A 100x on a token that makes up only 1% of your portfolio won’t meaningfully change your life. It’s better to make a few high-conviction bets than to overdiversify,” analyst The DeFi Investor said. Altcoin Index Surges but Investor Sentiment Remains Cautious The Altcoin Season Index from Blockchain Center now stands at 80 points. This indicates that over 80% of the top 50 altcoins outperformed…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:43