Was Jane Street Dumping BTC Daily?$Bitcoin recently broke above $67,000–$68,000 in a sharp rally that triggered a wave of short liquidations and added over $100Was Jane Street Dumping BTC Daily?$Bitcoin recently broke above $67,000–$68,000 in a sharp rally that triggered a wave of short liquidations and added over $100

Was Jane Street Dumping BTC Daily? The Truth Behind the “10AM Dump” Narrative

2026/02/26 02:45
4 min read

Was Jane Street Dumping BTC Daily?

$Bitcoin recently broke above $67,000–$68,000 in a sharp rally that triggered a wave of short liquidations and added over $100 billion to its market cap within 24 hours.

But beyond the price action, a different narrative took over Crypto Twitter:

Was Jane Street Dumping BTC Daily? The Truth Behind the “10AM Dump” Narrative
  • “The 10AM dump has stopped.”
  • “Jane Street was behind it.”
  • “The lawsuit changed everything.”

So what is the so-called “10AM dump”? And is there any evidence that Jane Street was systematically selling Bitcoin every day?

Let’s separate narrative from facts.

What Is the “10AM Dump”?

The “10AM dump” is an informal term used by traders to describe a pattern where Bitcoin often sold off around 10:00 AM Eastern Time.

Why that time?

  • US stock markets open at 9:30 AM ET
  • The first 30–60 minutes bring the highest liquidity
  • Major macroeconomic data is often released at 8:30 AM or 10:00 AM
  • Institutional hedging and ETF adjustments occur during this window

Many traders noticed that after overnight gains during Asia and Europe sessions, Bitcoin frequently reversed lower during the early US session.

Over time, this repeated behavior turned into a narrative:
that a large institutional player was deliberately “slamming” the market at 10AM.

However, time-based volatility around the US open is common across asset classes — not unique to crypto.

Why Was 10AM Important Today?

What made today different is that Bitcoin did not dump during the US open window.

Instead:

  • BTC broke resistance
  • Shorts were liquidated
  • Momentum accelerated
  • Price reclaimed key levels

When a widely observed intraday pattern suddenly breaks, traders interpret it as:

  • Selling pressure exhausted
  • A large seller stepping away
  • Positioning flipping
  • A short squeeze beginning

The absence of a dump became the signal.

But a pattern breaking does not automatically prove prior manipulation.

What Is the Lawsuit About?

The legal narrative centers around Terraform Labs — the company behind the 2022 collapse of $LUNA and $UST.

Terraform has alleged that certain trading firms, including Jane Street, engaged in structured trading activity related to UST during its peg defense period.

Key points circulating online include:

  • Allegations of coordinated trading strategies
  • Claims of benefiting from UST depeg mechanics
  • Structured derivatives positions

Important clarification:

  1. These are legal allegations within litigation.
  2. No court ruling has concluded wrongdoing regarding Bitcoin markets.
  3. The lawsuit relates to events surrounding UST and Terra — not proven daily BTC manipulation.

There is currently no verified evidence that Jane Street was systematically dumping Bitcoin at 10AM every day.

Was Jane Street Dumping BTC Daily?

Objectively speaking:

There is no confirmed proof of coordinated daily BTC dumping by Jane Street.

More plausible explanations for repeated 10AM volatility include:

  • ETF hedging adjustments
  • Market maker gamma positioning
  • Options expiry dynamics
  • Liquidity concentration at US open
  • Algorithmic rebalancing
  • Macro data releases

Large quantitative firms do trade during peak liquidity windows — because that is when execution is most efficient.

That does not automatically imply manipulation.

What Likely Drove the Recent Bitcoin Rally?

The recent breakout aligns more closely with:

  • Short squeeze dynamics
  • Heavy positioning imbalance
  • Liquidity vacuum above resistance
  • Broader macro volatility (tariffs, gold surge, debt concerns)
  • Institutional participation during US session

When markets are heavily shorted, the absence of expected selling pressure can trigger rapid upside cascades. That fits today’s structure more convincingly than the “manipulation stopped” theory.

Final Verdict

The “10AM dump” is a trader-observed pattern — not confirmed evidence of daily coordinated manipulation.

The lawsuit involving Terraform and Jane Street relates to Terra’s collapse, not proven systematic Bitcoin dumping. Bitcoin’s recent strength likely reflects positioning shifts and liquidity dynamics rather than the sudden disappearance of a single large seller.

In markets, narratives move fast.
But evidence moves slower.

And so far, the evidence does not support the claim that Jane Street was dumping BTC daily at 10AM.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0003858
$0.0003858$0.0003858
+1.04%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Dogecoin Surge With Stocks, But Analyst Warns This Might Just Be A 'Relief Rally'

Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Dogecoin Surge With Stocks, But Analyst Warns This Might Just Be A 'Relief Rally'

Leading cryptocurrencies jumped on Wednesday, though analysts view the uptick as a relief bounce rather than a momentum shift.read more
Share
Coinstats2026/02/26 10:04
The Chen Zhi case and the Zhao Changpeng case: The United States profited nearly $20 billion from them.

The Chen Zhi case and the Zhao Changpeng case: The United States profited nearly $20 billion from them.

Author: Yuan Hong , Global Times On February 26, a new report jointly released by the National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center of China and other departments
Share
PANews2026/02/26 11:18