The post Kalshi Fines MrBeast Associate Over Insider Trading Amid State Crackdown appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Kalshi Inc., a U.S.-regulated prediction The post Kalshi Fines MrBeast Associate Over Insider Trading Amid State Crackdown appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Kalshi Inc., a U.S.-regulated prediction

Kalshi Fines MrBeast Associate Over Insider Trading Amid State Crackdown

Kalshi Inc., a U.S.-regulated prediction market, suspended Artem Kaptur on February 25, 2026, for insider trading tied to MrBeast contracts. The action followed trades he placed in August and September 2025 while working as a visual effects editor for James Donaldson, known as MrBeast. Kalshi said Kaptur used material non-public information and failed to cooperate with its investigation.

Prediction Market Rules Violated in MrBeast Case

According to Kalshi’s disciplinary notice, Kaptur violated Rule 5.17(y) on prohibited insider transactions. The rule bars traders with material non-public information from entering related contracts. It also restricts employees or affiliates of a source agency from trading on linked markets.

The committee found reasonable cause that Kaptur traded while affiliated with a source agency for MrBeast contracts. He allegedly used information obtained through his employment. Kalshi said this conduct breached its insider trading restrictions within the prediction market.

In addition, the committee cited Rule 3.6(a), which requires members to cooperate fully with investigations. The prediction market platform said Kaptur failed to provide the required cooperation. As a result, the committee concluded he violated both provisions.

Kalshi stated that Kaptur traded roughly $4,000 across YouTube-related markets. He earned $5,397.58 in profits from those positions. The prediction market ordered disgorgement of that amount and imposed an additional $15,000 penalty.

As a result, Kalshi suspended him from direct or indirect platform access for two years. The total financial penalty reached $20,397.58. The prediction market platform noted it would donate the fine to a consumer education nonprofit.

Beast Industries, Kaptur’s employer, addressed the matter in a statement. The company said it has no tolerance for misuse of proprietary information. It also confirmed that it launched an independent investigation.

This move comes amid a crackdown by state regulators on prediction markets, who claim these platforms are unregulated betting platforms. As CoinGape reported, the CFTC has filed an amicus brief to defend its jurisdiction over these platforms. 

Second Case Deepens Markets’ Scrutiny

On the same day, Kalshi disclosed another enforcement action involving Kyle Langford. The California political candidate reportedly wagered about $200 on his own gubernatorial campaign. He later posted about the trade on social media.

The prediction market platform said it froze his account after reviewing a video showing the transaction. According to Bobby DeNault, head of enforcement, the candidate initially acknowledged the violation. The exchange then imposed a five-year ban and a $2,000 fine, equal to ten times the trade amount.

Langford has since shifted his campaign to a congressional race. As Coingape reported, Kalshi is facing a new lawsuit as legal pressure mounts on the prediction market industry. Kalshi also confirmed that it investigated about 200 insider trading cases and currently has more than a dozen active probes. 

The disclosures come as state regulators pursue actions against prediction market platforms over alleged unlicensed betting operations. Meanwhile, the CFTC is developing rules to govern the expanding prediction market sector.

Source: https://coingape.com/prediction-market-news-kalshi-fines-mrbeast-associate-over-insider-trading-amid-state-crackdown/

Market Opportunity
PUBLIC Logo
PUBLIC Price(PUBLIC)
$0.01528
$0.01528$0.01528
+5.81%
USD
PUBLIC (PUBLIC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Dogecoin Surge With Stocks, But Analyst Warns This Might Just Be A 'Relief Rally'

Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Dogecoin Surge With Stocks, But Analyst Warns This Might Just Be A 'Relief Rally'

Leading cryptocurrencies jumped on Wednesday, though analysts view the uptick as a relief bounce rather than a momentum shift.read more
Share
Coinstats2026/02/26 10:04
The Chen Zhi case and the Zhao Changpeng case: The United States profited nearly $20 billion from them.

The Chen Zhi case and the Zhao Changpeng case: The United States profited nearly $20 billion from them.

Author: Yuan Hong , Global Times On February 26, a new report jointly released by the National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center of China and other departments
Share
PANews2026/02/26 11:18