Enter the World of Ethereum Upgrades | What Has Ethereum Gained and Lost in the Last Five Years?
Ethereum did not stand still.
It actually scaled faster than ever.
But why did the ETH price fall behind?
From 2021 to 2026, the network moved through one of the most aggressive upgrade cycles in financial technology history. It changed its consensus model. It rebuilt its fee structure. It redesigned the user experience. It redefined validator economics. It expanded data capacity. It prepared for quantum risk. It addressed censorship resistance.
Yet ETH trades near $1,800 to $2,050 as of February 2026, roughly 58 percent below its all-time high of $4,878 set in November 2021.
So what happened?
Did Ethereum win the infrastructure race but lose the market narrative?
This article breaks down every major Ethereum upgrade in the past five years, what each brought to the table, what worked, what did not, how the price reacted, and what to expect through 2028.
No hype. No tribal framing. Only structure.
Ethereum’s transformation started with The Merge in September 2022. While this article focuses on the last five years, you cannot understand Ethereum today without recognizing that moment.
The Merge shifted Ethereum from Proof of Work to Proof of Stake. Energy consumption dropped by over 99 percent. Block production moved to validators instead of miners.
What Ethereum gained:
What Ethereum lost:
The Merge did not reduce gas fees. Many retail investors expected that. That misunderstanding damaged short-term sentiment.
Price impact:
ETH rallied into the Merge and sold off after. Markets had priced it in. Macro conditions in 2022 also deteriorated sharply due to tightening of monetary policy.
The Merge was foundational. But it did not solve scalability.
That required the next wave.
In April 2023, Ethereum activated Shapella, also known as Shanghai and Capella.
This upgrade allowed validators to withdraw staked ETH for the first time since December 2020.
Before Shapella, staked ETH had no exit.
What Ethereum gained:
What critics feared:
What actually happened:
Withdrawals occurred in phases. Some validators exited. Many restaked. Net staking participation grew over time.
By early 2026, over 30 percent of total ETH supply remained staked. Estimates range between 37 million and 77 million ETH depending on reporting methodology and inclusion criteria.
Shapella strengthened the staking economy instead of weakening it.
Price impact:
Moderate. ETH stabilized. Macro still dominated flows. No collapse occurred.
Shapella reduced structural risk. That mattered more than price in the short term.
March 2024 marked one of the most important upgrades in Ethereum’s scaling journey.
Dencun introduced Proto-Danksharding through EIP-4844. It added “blobs” to store Layer 2 data cheaply.
Before Dencun:
Layer 2 rollups paid high costs to publish data to the Ethereum mainnet.
After Dencun:
Layer 2 fees fell by 90 to 98 percent in many cases.
Some L2 transactions fell as low as $0.001 by early 2026.
What Ethereum gained:
What Ethereum lost:
This is where the scaling paradox emerged.
By moving activity to Layer 2, Ethereum reduced mainnet fee pressure. Since EIP-1559 burns part of transaction fees, lower L1 fees meant less ETH burned.
From April 2024 onward, Ethereum’s supply increased by about 0.37 percent. Total supply reached roughly 120.59 million ETH.
Investors who bought the “ultrasound money” narrative felt disappointed.
Network usage hit record highs. Burn rate declined. Supply slightly expanded.
Price impact:
Muted. Dencun improved fundamentals but weakened the deflation story. Macro risk and competition from Solana intensified during this period.
Dencun succeeded technically. It complicated the tokenomics story.
In May 2025, Ethereum deployed Pectra. This combined Prague on the execution layer and Electra on the consensus layer.
Pectra introduced three structural shifts.
What Ethereum gained:
Validator activation time fell from around 12 hours to roughly 13 minutes.
Large institutions consolidated thousands of nodes into fewer operational units.
What Ethereum lost:
Account abstraction marked a turning point.
Ethereum began to feel less like crypto infrastructure and more like fintech rails.
Price impact:
Limited immediate response. Macro pressures in early 2025 weighed on high-beta assets.
Pectra improved usability and institutional readiness. Price did not immediately reward that progress.
December 2025 introduced Fusaka and PeerDAS.
Peer Data Availability Sampling allowed validators to sample small pieces of block data instead of downloading entire blocks.
Data capacity increased by approximately 8x without raising hardware requirements.
What Ethereum gained:
Passkey support also advanced wallet usability. Biometric signing reduced reliance on seed phrases.
Fusaka represented a quiet structural strength.
Price impact:
Minimal immediate effect. Broader crypto markets faced macro volatility in early 2026.
Fusaka did not drive headlines. It strengthened the infrastructure.
Despite price weakness, network metrics expanded sharply.
As of February 2026:
According to industry reporting and on-chain aggregation platforms, Ethereum hosts over 90 percent of tokenized real-world assets and roughly 60 percent of stablecoin value.
Institutional participation increased. BlackRock reportedly holds millions of ETH for ETF exposure. Fidelity operates significant infrastructure. Robinhood holds around 1.5 million ETH on behalf of users.
Utility expanded.
Price lagged.
Several forces converged.
Ethereum’s infrastructure strengthened. Market structure weakened.
Planned for the first half of 2026, Glamsterdam focuses on parallel transaction execution and gas limit expansion toward 200 million per block.
Analysts expect potential throughput near 10,000 transactions per second if implementation succeeds.
What Ethereum aims to gain:
If L1 activity rises meaningfully, EIP-1559 burn could return Ethereum to deflation.
Bullish projections from institutions range between $4,000 and $8,000 for 2026. Higher estimates exist but require strong ETF inflows and macro support.
Risks:
Glamsterdam represents narrative repositioning from scaling experiment to infrastructure maturity.
Hegota, scheduled for the second half of 2026, focuses on Verkle Trees and statelessness.
Verkle Trees compress state proofs from hundreds of kilobytes to roughly 150 bytes.
What this enables:
State expiry mechanisms aim to prevent long-term state bloat.
FOCIL introduces Fork-Choice Enforced Inclusion Lists. Builders must include valid transactions or risk rejection by the network.
FOCIL strengthens censorship resistance.
Hegota positions Ethereum for long-term decentralization resilience.
It also includes early quantum preparedness discussions.
Ethereum matured from an experimental chain to a financial infrastructure.
Ethereum evolved into a complex system.
Complex systems require deeper investor understanding.
Ethereum is no longer in its experimental phase. It is entering an optimization cycle.
Beginning in 2026, the network transitions into a structured biannual upgrade rhythm. Two major updates per year will focus on performance, sustainability, and resilience.
The roadmap from 2026 to 2028 centers on six core pillars:
Glamsterdam introduces parallel transaction processing. The goal is to reduce bottlenecks in execution and scale throughput toward high-performance Layer 1 competitors.
If successful, Ethereum moves from modular scaling dependence toward stronger native performance.
Gas limits are expected to expand toward the 100M to 200M range per block.
Higher limits allow more transaction inclusion per block, increasing L1 demand and potentially strengthening the burn mechanism under EIP-1559.
Hegota focuses on Verkle Trees and state compression.
This reduces node storage requirements and supports stateless clients, lowering participation barriers and preserving decentralization under higher load.
State expiry mechanisms aim to prevent long-term blockchain bloat.
This keeps Ethereum lean while transaction volume grows, protecting decentralization over the next decade.
FOCIL enforces transaction inclusion at the protocol level.
This reduces builder-level filtering and strengthens Ethereum’s neutrality under regulatory pressure.
Developers are exploring post-quantum cryptographic upgrades.
While quantum risk remains long-term, early preparation signals infrastructure seriousness.
Ethereum now enters a biannual upgrade cycle.
Focus areas:
If L1 demand increases meaningfully, burn mechanics could tighten supply.
If macro conditions stabilize and ETF flows return, the price may realign with network strength.
If competition accelerates and macro remains tight, ETH may underperform Bitcoin.
The next two years will test whether infrastructure maturity converts into capital flows.
Ethereum did not stagnate.
It rebuilt itself.
It lowered costs by up to 98 percent on Layer 2. It onboarded millions of new users. It locked a large share of supply in staking. It strengthened censorship resistance.
But it weakened a narrative.
Investors who value simplicity struggled to model Ethereum’s multi-layer evolution.
Ethereum gained infrastructure dominance.
It temporarily lost price momentum.
The next phase will determine whether that trade reverses.
This article is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Digital assets are volatile and carry risk. Always conduct independent research or consult a qualified financial professional before making investment decisions.
The Ethereum Upgrade Era: What Changed, What Broke, and What Comes Next was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.


