Trillanes denied receiving a supposed $2 million bribe for ICC investigators, and filed criminal complaints against the 'ex-Marines' and other personalitiesTrillanes denied receiving a supposed $2 million bribe for ICC investigators, and filed criminal complaints against the 'ex-Marines' and other personalities

FACT CHECK: Trillanes not arrested over alleged ICC ‘bribe’

2026/03/05 14:36
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Claim: Former senator Antonio Trillanes IV was arrested and imprisoned for receiving $2 million to bribe the investigators of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Rating: FALSE

Why we fact-checked this: Several Facebook and YouTube posts are spreading these allegations, with one from the channel “News Update Files” reaching more than 11,000 views, 1,100 likes, and 90 comments as of writing.

The video’s title reads, “Kinarma na! Antonio Trillanes nakulong na! Deserved! Arestado na! Bilyon-bilyong pera nabulgar na.”

(Karma has struck! Antonio Trillanes is now imprisoned! Deserved! Under arrest! Billions of pesos have been exposed!)

The claim surfaced following a press conference on February 24, in which a group of 18 “ex-Marines,” represented by lawyer Levi Baligod, claimed that $2 million was delivered to Trillanes from former lawmaker Zaldy Co, supposedly to fund “witness operations” and facilitate the ICC’s probe into former president Rodrigo Duterte’s crimes against humanity case linked to his administration’s war on drugs.

The facts: Trillanes has not been arrested or imprisoned, contrary to the claim. He has also dismissed the allegations, calling them a “blatant lie.”

“I vehemently deny that I received $2 million or any amount from Zaldy Co for the ICC investigation or any other purpose. This is an attempt to discredit the ongoing ICC proceedings against Duterte,” Trillanes said in a February 24 Facebook post.

He also questioned the timing of the allegations, which coincided with Duterte’s pre-trial hearing, held from February 23 to 27.

Speaking to journalist Jessica Soho, Trillanes said, “Bakit ngayon kung kailan kasagsagan ng confirmation of charges hearing? Bakit ngayon sila mag-eexpose? Those are the spin. Kasi kailangan nila palabasin na sinuhulan, para magamit ni Kaufman, na sasabihin, corrupt ‘yung mga ICC investigators.

(Why now, when the confirmation of charges hearing is in full swing? Why are they exposing these claims now? That’s spin. Because they need to make it appear that there was bribery, so that [Duterte’s lead defense counsel Nicholas] Kaufman can say that ICC investigators are corrupt.)

On Thursday, March 5, Trillanes filed a perjury complaint against the 18 “ex-Marines” due to their “false testimonies,” and a cyber libel and incriminating an innocent person complaint against Baligod and several other personalities.

Independent probe: Asked about the former soldiers’ allegations, the ICC prosecution clarified that it conducted its investigations into Duterte’s case independently, using funds from the court.

“The Office independently collects the information relevant to its investigations, identifies the individuals from whom it collects witness statements, and assesses the credibility, reliability, and relevance of all sources of information it requests and receives, and examines incriminating and exonerating evidence equally,” the Office of the Prosecutor said in a statement to Rappler. (READ: Ex-marines’ affidavit dragging ICC a ‘deliberate intimidation’ – deputy prosecutor)

Questionable identities: Additionally, the Philippine Navy revealed that, based on their records, four of the supposed “bagmen” presented by Baligod were never members of the Philippine Navy or the Philippine Marine Corps, and that the “majority” of the rest were dishonorably discharged.

The Philippine Marine Corps slammed the group of alleged bagmen as “opportunistic.”

PMC Commandant Major General Vicente Blanco III said individuals who were dishonorably discharged are not “true” Marines, adding, “We should always look with disdain against opportunistic groups or individuals trying to link their actions as being true Marines — they are unworthy of our respect.” – Princess Leah Sagaad/Rappler.com

Keep us aware of suspicious Facebook pages, groups, accounts, websites, articles, or photos in your network by contacting us at factcheck@rappler.com. Let us battle disinformation one Fact Check at a time.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Russian Central Bank Proposes Allowing Banks and Brokers to Obtain Crypto Licenses

Russian Central Bank Proposes Allowing Banks and Brokers to Obtain Crypto Licenses

The Bank of Russia has proposed allowing banks and brokerage firms to obtain licenses to operate crypto exchanges, a move that would place traditional financial
Share
Financemagnates2026/03/05 22:54
CME pushes Solana, XRP into derivatives spotlight with new options

CME pushes Solana, XRP into derivatives spotlight with new options

CME Group is launching options for Solana and XRP futures this October. The move signals a major shift, acknowledging that institutional liquidity is now firmly expanding beyond the established dominance of Bitcoin and Ether. According to a press release dated…
Share
Crypto.news2025/09/18 01:18
How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

The post How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 13: Participants hold signs in support of TikTok outside the U.S. Capitol Building on March 13, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) Getty Images From President Trump’s first ban attempt to a near-blackout earlier this year, TikTok’s five-year roller coaster ride looks like it’s finally slowing down now that Trump has unveiled a deal framework to keep the ByteDance app alive in the U.S. A look back at the saga around TikTok starting in 2020, however, shows just how close the app came to being shut out of the US – how it narrowly averted a ban and forced sale that found rare bipartisan backing in Washington. Recapping TikTok’s dramatic five-year battle When I interviewed Brendan Carr back in 2022, for example, the future FCC chairman was already certain at that point that TikTok’s days were numbered. For a litany of perceived sins — everything from the too-cozy relationship of the app’s parent company with China’s ruling regime to the app’s repeated floating of user privacy — Carr was already convinced, at least during his conversation with me, that: “The tide is going out on TikTok.” It was, in fact, one of the few issues that Washington lawmakers seemed to agree on. Even then-President Biden was on board, having resurrected Trump’s aborted TikTok ban from his first term and signed it into law. “It feels different now than it did two years ago at the end of the Trump administration, when concerns were first raised,” Carr told me then, in August of 2022. “I think, like a lot of things in the Trump era, people sort of picked sides on the issue based on the fact that it was Trump.” One thing led to another, though, and it looked like Carr was probably…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:29