The post Is Trump Renaming Department of Defense To Department Of War Legal? What To Know. appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline President Donald Trump signed an executive order Friday renaming the Department of Defense as the “Department of War,” an unofficial change for now, as Trump does not have the legal authority to change the name without Congress. President Donald Trump speaks during in a cabinet meeting alongside Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth at the White House on August 26. AFP via Getty Images Key Facts Trump signed an order renaming the Defense agency on Friday, after repeatedly saying publicly that he thinks the name should be reverted to the “Department of War.” The Defense Department was previously known as the “Department of War” until the 1940s, when the name was changed after World War II and the various departments of the military—the Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force—were all consolidated into a single agency. That name change was made by Congress, as lawmakers formally rebranded the agency as the Department of Defense in 1949 when they amended the National Security Act. Because of that, it would take another act of Congress to formally change the name back to the Department of War, and Trump cannot do it unilaterally on his own through an executive order. Despite Trump’s order on Friday, that means the name change won’t actually be official, with the White House saying in a fact sheet that they intend to make the Department of War name a “secondary title” for the agency. Trump will also direct Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to “recommend actions,” including acts of Congress, that would make the name change permanent. What Will Trump’s Executive Order Say? The executive order will install the Department of War as a “secondary” name for the agency, and also direct Hegseth to now be known under a “secondary title” of the “Secretary of War,” according to a… The post Is Trump Renaming Department of Defense To Department Of War Legal? What To Know. appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline President Donald Trump signed an executive order Friday renaming the Department of Defense as the “Department of War,” an unofficial change for now, as Trump does not have the legal authority to change the name without Congress. President Donald Trump speaks during in a cabinet meeting alongside Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth at the White House on August 26. AFP via Getty Images Key Facts Trump signed an order renaming the Defense agency on Friday, after repeatedly saying publicly that he thinks the name should be reverted to the “Department of War.” The Defense Department was previously known as the “Department of War” until the 1940s, when the name was changed after World War II and the various departments of the military—the Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force—were all consolidated into a single agency. That name change was made by Congress, as lawmakers formally rebranded the agency as the Department of Defense in 1949 when they amended the National Security Act. Because of that, it would take another act of Congress to formally change the name back to the Department of War, and Trump cannot do it unilaterally on his own through an executive order. Despite Trump’s order on Friday, that means the name change won’t actually be official, with the White House saying in a fact sheet that they intend to make the Department of War name a “secondary title” for the agency. Trump will also direct Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to “recommend actions,” including acts of Congress, that would make the name change permanent. What Will Trump’s Executive Order Say? The executive order will install the Department of War as a “secondary” name for the agency, and also direct Hegseth to now be known under a “secondary title” of the “Secretary of War,” according to a…

Is Trump Renaming Department of Defense To Department Of War Legal? What To Know.

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Topline

President Donald Trump signed an executive order Friday renaming the Department of Defense as the “Department of War,” an unofficial change for now, as Trump does not have the legal authority to change the name without Congress.

President Donald Trump speaks during in a cabinet meeting alongside Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth at the White House on August 26.

AFP via Getty Images

Key Facts

Trump signed an order renaming the Defense agency on Friday, after repeatedly saying publicly that he thinks the name should be reverted to the “Department of War.”

The Defense Department was previously known as the “Department of War” until the 1940s, when the name was changed after World War II and the various departments of the military—the Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force—were all consolidated into a single agency.

That name change was made by Congress, as lawmakers formally rebranded the agency as the Department of Defense in 1949 when they amended the National Security Act.

Because of that, it would take another act of Congress to formally change the name back to the Department of War, and Trump cannot do it unilaterally on his own through an executive order.

Despite Trump’s order on Friday, that means the name change won’t actually be official, with the White House saying in a fact sheet that they intend to make the Department of War name a “secondary title” for the agency.

Trump will also direct Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to “recommend actions,” including acts of Congress, that would make the name change permanent.

What Will Trump’s Executive Order Say?

The executive order will install the Department of War as a “secondary” name for the agency, and also direct Hegseth to now be known under a “secondary title” of the “Secretary of War,” according to a fact sheet the White House provided to Forbes. Though the name change won’t actually be official, Trump will still direct the “Department of War” name and officials’ secondary “war” titles to be used on all external and internal communications throughout the executive branch. The order will also instruct Hegseth to recommend moves that are “required to permanently rename the U.S. Department of Defense to the U.S. Department of War.”

Why Did The Name Change To The Department Of Defense?

President George Washington initially established the Department of War back in 1789, though the agency historically only oversaw the Army, while other branches of the military were their own separate agencies. After World War II, Congress and President Harry Truman decided to consolidate the branches of the military into a single agency, citing the need for greater unification and coordination between the agencies as the Cold War began. There was a “recognition” at the time “that the United States is going to continue to have forces deployed on a global level and … that just is going to require a more unified command structure,” Wayne Lee, a military history professor at the University of North Carolina (UNC) told Task & Purpose. The various branches were consolidated into what was known as the “National Military Establishment” with the National Security Act in 1947, and that law was later amended in 1949 to retitle the agency as the Department of Defense. While Trump has suggested the name change was made to be more “politically correct,” UNC military history professor Richard H. Kohn told The New York Times it was more to project an image of peace in the wake of World War II and as the Cold War was beginning. The name change “was to communicate to America’s adversaries and the rest of the world that America was not about making war but defending the United States, and saying that if that requires war, there are four major armed services,” Kohn said.

How Much Will The Name Change Cost?

It’s still unclear how much the change to “Department of War” will cost the federal government—given the cost of changing signage, official documentation and other assets—but it will likely be millions of dollars. A 2022 report by the Naming Commission to Congress found that efforts by the Department of Defense to change the names of all military assets that honor Confederate leaders, which would be less widespread than this initiative, would cost an estimated $62.5 million.

Crucial Quote

“If we call it the Dept. of War, we’d better equip the military to actually prevent and win wars,” Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said in a tweet. “Can’t preserve American primacy if we’re unwilling to spend substantially more on our military than Carter or Biden. ‘Peace through strength’ requires investment, not just rebranding.”

Chief Critic

Democrats have been heavily critical of Trump’s decision to rename the Department of Defense, decrying the emphasis on “war” and casting the name change as a performative and costly move Trump is undertaking rather than actually investing in the nation’s troops. “Why not put this money toward supporting military families or toward employing diplomats that help prevent conflicts from starting in the first place?” Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., a military veteran, told Reuters. “Because Trump would rather use our military to score political points than to strengthen our national security and support our brave servicemembers and their families—that’s why.”

Key Background

Trump’s executive order comes after he and his administration had repeatedly teased that they wanted to restore the military agency’s previous name. “We want to be defensive, but we want to be offensive, too, if we have to be,” Trump said last week about the name change, calling the Department of Defense name “too defensive” and claiming the U.S. had an “unbelievable history of victory” under its old moniker. The president also referred to Hegseth as the “Secretary of War” on Truth Social in July and claimed in June that the post-World War II change was made because “we became politically correct.” Hegseth has also argued the Department of War title projects more strength, telling Fox News last week, “We won World War I, and we won World War II, not with the Department of Defense, but with a War Department, with the Department of War.” The order marks the latest controversial name change by the president since he took office, with Trump also rebranding the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America.”

Further Reading

ForbesDefense Department Being Renamed Department Of War Under Trump Executive Order

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/09/05/trump-renames-defense-department-to-department-of-war-is-it-legal-heres-what-to-know/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.006929
$0.006929$0.006929
+3.58%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Steel Dynamics (STLD) Stock Dips Following Disappointing Q1 Earnings Forecast

Steel Dynamics (STLD) Stock Dips Following Disappointing Q1 Earnings Forecast

Steel Dynamics (STLD) stock dropped 1.3% premarket after issuing Q1 EPS guidance of $2.73–$2.77, significantly below the $3.24 Wall Street consensus. The post Steel
Share
Blockonomi2026/03/17 21:45
EUR/CHF slides as Euro struggles post-inflation data

EUR/CHF slides as Euro struggles post-inflation data

The post EUR/CHF slides as Euro struggles post-inflation data appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. EUR/CHF weakens for a second straight session as the euro struggles to recover post-Eurozone inflation data. Eurozone core inflation steady at 2.3%, headline CPI eases to 2.0% in August. SNB maintains a flexible policy outlook ahead of its September 25 decision, with no immediate need for easing. The Euro (EUR) trades under pressure against the Swiss Franc (CHF) on Wednesday, with EUR/CHF extending losses for the second straight session as the common currency struggles to gain traction following Eurozone inflation data. At the time of writing, the cross is trading around 0.9320 during the American session. The latest inflation data from Eurostat showed that Eurozone price growth remained broadly stable in August, reinforcing the European Central Bank’s (ECB) cautious stance on monetary policy. The Core Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices (HICP), which excludes volatile items such as food and energy, rose 2.3% YoY, in line with both forecasts and the previous month’s reading. On a monthly basis, core inflation increased by 0.3%, unchanged from July, highlighting persistent underlying price pressures in the bloc. Meanwhile, headline inflation eased to 2.0% YoY in August, down from 2.1% in July and slightly below expectations. On a monthly basis, prices rose just 0.1%, missing forecasts for a 0.2% increase and decelerating from July’s 0.2% rise. The inflation release follows last week’s ECB policy decision, where the central bank kept all three key interest rates unchanged and signaled that policy is likely at its terminal level. While officials acknowledged progress in bringing inflation down, they reiterated a cautious, data-dependent approach going forward, emphasizing the need to maintain restrictive conditions for an extended period to ensure price stability. On the Swiss side, disinflation appears to be deepening. The Producer and Import Price Index dropped 0.6% in August, marking a sharp 1.8% annual decline. Broader inflation remains…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:08
New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York’s top financial regulator urged banks to adopt blockchain analytics, signaling tighter oversight of crypto-linked risks. The move reflects regulators’ concern that traditional institutions face rising exposure to digital assets. While crypto-native firms already rely on monitoring tools, the Department of Financial Services now expects banks to use them to detect illicit activity. NYDFS Outlines Compliance Expectations The notice, issued on Wednesday by Superintendent Adrienne Harris, applies to all state-chartered banks and foreign branches. In its industry letter, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) emphasized that blockchain analytics should be integrated into compliance programs according to each bank’s size, operations, and risk appetite. The regulator cautioned that crypto markets evolve quickly, requiring institutions to update frameworks regularly. “Emerging technologies introduce evolving threats that require enhanced monitoring tools,” the notice stated. It stressed the need for banks to prevent money laundering, sanctions violations, and other illicit finance linked to virtual currency transactions. To that end, the Department listed specific areas where blockchain analytics can be applied: Screening customer wallets with crypto exposure to assess risks. Verifying the origin of funds from virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Monitoring the ecosystem holistically to detect money laundering or sanctions exposure. Identifying and assessing counterparties, such as third-party VASPs. Evaluating expected versus actual transaction activity, including dollar thresholds. Weighing risks tied to new digital asset products before rollout. These examples highlight how institutions can tailor monitoring tools to strengthen their risk management frameworks. The guidance expands on NYDFS’s Virtual Currency-Related Activities (VCRA) framework, which has governed crypto oversight in the state since 2022. Regulators Signal Broader Impact Market observers say the notice is less about new rules and more about clarifying expectations. By formalizing the role of blockchain analytics in traditional finance, New York is reinforcing the idea that banks cannot treat crypto exposure as a niche concern. Analysts also believe the approach could ripple beyond New York. Federal agencies and regulators in other states may view the guidance as a blueprint for aligning banking oversight with the realities of digital asset adoption. For institutions, failure to adopt blockchain intelligence tools may invite regulatory scrutiny and undermine their ability to safeguard customer trust. With crypto now firmly embedded in global finance, New York’s stance suggests that blockchain analytics are no longer optional for banks — they are essential to protecting the financial system’s integrity.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 08:49