The post Pudgy Penguins Hit WIth Trademark Suit Over Merch appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. PEI Licensing, the firm behind the clothing brand Original PenguinThe post Pudgy Penguins Hit WIth Trademark Suit Over Merch appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. PEI Licensing, the firm behind the clothing brand Original Penguin

Pudgy Penguins Hit WIth Trademark Suit Over Merch

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

PEI Licensing, the firm behind the clothing brand Original Penguin, has filed a lawsuit against the nonfungible token project Pudgy Penguins, alleging trademark infringement, dilution and unfair competition.

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in a Florida federal court, focuses on Pudgy Penguins’ apparel, alleging the company uses a “family of penguin trademarks that are confusingly similar” to PEI’s marks.

“This action results from Defendant’s unauthorized use and attempted registration of various PENGUIN word and design trademarks in connection with apparel and related goods and services that are confusingly similar to PEI’s federally registered and famous PENGUIN and penguin design trademarks,” PEI said in its complaint.

An excerpt of PEI’s complaint comparing its Original Penguin brand to Pudgy Penguins’ merchandise. Source: CourtListener

PEI claimed in its lawsuit that it has used the “PENGUIN word mark at least as early as 1967” and first used a “penguin design” on apparel as early as 1956.

PEI Licensing said that it sent a cease and desist to Pudgy Penguins in October 2023, claiming its “products infringe and dilute PEI’s famous PENGUIN Marks.”

The letter also demanded that Pudgy Penguins abandon applications with the US Patent and Trademark Office “to register various PENGUIN marks,” according to the lawsuit.

PEI claimed that Pudgy Penguins had “misappropriated valuable property rights of PEI,” which was “likely to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive members of the consuming public.”

PEI asked the court to order the USPTO to reject Pudgy Penguins’ applications and stop the company from allegedly infringing on its trademark. 

Related: SEC ends case against Justin Sun with $10M settlement

It also requested that Pudgy Penguins be ordered to destroy any products found “likely to be confused” with PEI’s trademarks and be awarded all profits from the sales of such products.

Pudgy Penguins’ legal chief, Jennifer McGlone, told Cointelegraph that the company “was surprised by the action, particularly as both parties had been engaged in productive discussions to resolve this matter privately.”

McGlone said the company had advanced applications with the USPTO and was “confident that PEI’s claims lack merit. The trademarks in question are visually distinct and serve entirely different audiences and markets.”

“We have the utmost confidence that we will prevail as Pudgy Penguins has already secured multiple trademark application approvals from the USPTO covering the Pudgy Penguins brand and related marks,” she said.

Meanwhile, the Pudgy Penguins X account posted a meme implying that its brand bears no similarities to Original Penguin.

Source: Pudgy Penguins

Magazine: Clarity Act risks repeat of Europe’s mistakes, crypto lawyer warns

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently. Read our Editorial Policy https://cointelegraph.com/editorial-policy

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/pei-licensing-files-trademark-infringement-lawsuit-against-pudgy-penguins?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
Nietzschean Penguin Logo
Nietzschean Penguin Price(PENGUIN)
$0.005569
$0.005569$0.005569
+18.69%
USD
Nietzschean Penguin (PENGUIN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Silver Prices Edge Closer to a Pivotal Support and Resistance Test

Silver Prices Edge Closer to a Pivotal Support and Resistance Test

The post Silver Prices Edge Closer to a Pivotal Support and Resistance Test appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The silver market, although experiencing recent
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/07 11:29
U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

The post U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crime 18 September 2025 | 04:05 A Colorado judge has brought closure to one of the state’s most unusual cryptocurrency scandals, declaring INDXcoin to be a fraudulent operation and ordering its founders, Denver pastor Eli Regalado and his wife Kaitlyn, to repay $3.34 million. The ruling, issued by District Court Judge Heidi L. Kutcher, came nearly two years after the couple persuaded hundreds of people to invest in their token, promising safety and abundance through a Christian-branded platform called the Kingdom Wealth Exchange. The scheme ran between June 2022 and April 2023 and drew in more than 300 participants, many of them members of local church networks. Marketing materials portrayed INDXcoin as a low-risk gateway to prosperity, yet the project unraveled almost immediately. The exchange itself collapsed within 24 hours of launch, wiping out investors’ money. Despite this failure—and despite an auditor’s damning review that gave the system a “0 out of 10” for security—the Regalados kept presenting it as a solid opportunity. Colorado regulators argued that the couple’s faith-based appeal was central to the fraud. Securities Commissioner Tung Chan said the Regalados “dressed an old scam in new technology” and used their standing within the Christian community to convince people who had little knowledge of crypto. For him, the case illustrates how modern digital assets can be exploited to replicate classic Ponzi-style tactics under a different name. Court filings revealed where much of the money ended up: luxury goods, vacations, jewelry, a Range Rover, high-end clothing, and even dental procedures. In a video that drew worldwide attention earlier this year, Eli Regalado admitted the funds had been spent, explaining that a portion went to taxes while the remainder was used for a home renovation he claimed was divinely inspired. The judgment not only confirms that INDXcoin qualifies as a…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:14
[Newspoint] Overpaid troll

[Newspoint] Overpaid troll

KAUFMAN. Former president Rodrigo Duterte's lawyer Nicholas Kaufman delivers his opening statement before the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I on February 23, 2026.
Share
Rappler2026/03/07 11:00