The post 38 days of extreme fear as crypto sentiment hits 4-year low – Should you be worried? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The digital asset market has The post 38 days of extreme fear as crypto sentiment hits 4-year low – Should you be worried? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The digital asset market has

38 days of extreme fear as crypto sentiment hits 4-year low – Should you be worried?

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

The digital asset market has entered a period not witnessed in nearly four years.

As of the 9th of March 2026, the Crypto Fear and Greed Index has bottomed to 8, marking the 38th consecutive day the gauge has remained frozen in “Extreme Fear”.

Source: Alternative

According to data highlighted by Quinten Francois, this current streak stands as the longest period of sustained “Extreme Fear” since the catastrophic Terra/Luna collapse of 2022.

After peaking at a “Greed” level of 61 on the 15th of January, the Index began a steady decline, slipping into the fear zone by the 28th of January and remaining there since.

Source: Quinten/X

What happened back in 2022?

Unlike the 2022 crash, which was driven by major failures and a sudden liquidity crunch, the 2026 downturn appears more like a gradual market reset.

Several macro pressures from tariffs and uncertainty around the next Federal Reserve chair to the escalating U.S.–Iran conflict are adding further strain on the crypto market.

Thus, what began as strong optimism at the start of the year has now shifted into a clean risk-off environment. This has also left analysts questioning whether the market is approaching capitulation or getting ready for a new cycle.

RSI indicators stand in the ‘oversold’ territory

That being said, technical indicators support this weakness. The broader Crypto RSI stuck at 47.37, remaining below the neutral 50 mark for nearly three months, signaling prolonged market fatigue rather than short-term volatility.

However, the 30-day active addresses of Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH] analysis show some clues about whether the ongoing “Extreme Fear” phase is ending or deepening.

Source: Santiment

From mid-January to early February, both networks recorded rising participation. As per Santiment data, Ethereum’s active addresses increased from 14 million to over 16 million, while Bitcoin peaked near 12.3 million.

Such growth in on-chain activity typically reflects stronger organic demand and often acts as one of the indicators of market recovery.

However, since mid-February, activity has cooled. Bitcoin’s active addresses have slipped back toward 12 million, while Ethereum has declined to around 15.5 million. 

This drop, along with the prevailing Extreme Fear sentiment, indicates investors are stepping back into cautious consolidation.

Hence, until active addresses and other metrics start rising again, crypto will likely remain stuck in a cautious phase, waiting for a new catalyst to act on.


Final Summary

  • Technical indicators and sentiment data together suggest the market is in a prolonged cooling cycle, and not a short-term correction.
  • Historically, extended fear phases have preceded major reversals, but the unusual duration of the current streak keeps the market in a waiting game. 
Next: Chiliz jumps 10%: Is CHZ’s breakout signaling a stronger recovery?

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/38-days-of-extreme-fear-as-crypto-sentiment-hits-4-year-low-should-you-be-worried/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.