A Solana-based Telegram trading bot project, Aquabot, has allegedly executed a rug pull, disappearing with more than $4.65 million in presale funds just hours before its planned token generation event. On-chain investigator ZachXBT was the first to flag the suspicious activity, noting that Aquabot’s presale wallet moved 21,770 SOL, worth roughly $4.65 million, into multiple intermediary addresses before routing the funds to instant exchanges. The transfers were split into four tranches, a tactic often associated with attempts to obscure transaction trails. Solana Community Warns of Presale Scams After Aquabot Controversy The presale address, identified as 4Ea23VxEGAgfbtauQZz11aKNtzHJwb84ppsg3Cz14u6q, had collected the funds through what the project described as a “gamified” presale mechanism. Investors were told they could receive multipliers on their allocations through a randomizer, and the team initially promised 100% token distribution at launch without vesting. However, shortly before the token generation event, Aquabot altered its terms, imposing vesting on presale buyers. The sudden fund movements came just before the launch, triggering accusations of fraud across the Solana community. Following the transfers, the Aquabot team locked replies on all of its X posts, further fueling concerns. The situation has drawn heightened scrutiny because several high-profile names in the Solana ecosystem had promoted Aquabot. Platforms and teams, including Meteora, Quill Audits, Helius, SYMMIO, and Dialect, amplified the project in recent weeks. Influencers also endorsed the presale, touting its novel approach to distribution and low trading fees compared with competitors. Critics argue that such endorsements have created a false sense of security around the project. “Once again, reputable protocols interact and make partnerships with ruggers, and then they act like nothing happened,” one community member wrote, reflecting growing frustration with repeated presale scams on Solana. Aquabot marketed itself as a low-fee Telegram trading bot, promising a 0.25% transaction fee structure and a novel “liquidity ladder” presale design intended to stagger entry prices for buyers. The approach was pitched as a solution to the “inorganic” trading patterns that often emerge when all presale investors share the same cost basis. Enthusiasm for the model was visible across X, where some users said that they considered replicating the idea for future token launches. Instead, the project appears to have followed a familiar pattern of sudden fund withdrawals and vanished communication channels. With the presale funds now dispersed across exchanges, recovery prospects appear slim. The incident has reignited calls for greater transparency in Solana’s rapidly growing ecosystem. Critics say teams and investors need to exercise far more caution when associating with new projects, particularly those offering novel mechanics or unusually favorable terms. “There can be no tolerance for such behavior. What we need—at the very least—is radical transparency across Solana,” ZachXBT said in his Telegram channel, where he first detailed the transfers. Surge in Solana Presale Scams Raises Investor Concerns This is not the first time the network has faced presale scams; last year, ZachXBT warned that many projects are either fraudulent or on the verge of rug pulls. On Solana, presale hype fueled a wave of rug pulls. Blockchain investigator ZachXBT flagged multiple cases where projects collected millions in SOL before vanishing. One wallet tied to @Sartoshi0x raised 7,000 SOL but withheld 62% of the funds. Another scam directed 2,100 SOL to a fake Jared MEV bot account. Presales by @bluekirbyftm and @Vombatus_eth also collapsed after promises of refunds were broken. In total, just 33 presales pulled in over $150 million in SOL. Despite the risks, Solana’s social metrics surged. LunarCrush reported more than 22.6 million engagements and 121,000 mentions, with Solana’s market cap climbing to $116.7 billion. A $1.65 billion Solana treasury initiative led by Galaxy Digital, Jump Crypto, and Multicoin Capital further boosted confidence in the ecosystem. Meanwhile, in the U.S., federal prosecutors secured a conviction in one of the year’s biggest cryptojacking cases. Charles O. Parks III, known as “CP3O,” was sentenced to one year and a day in prison for defrauding cloud service providers of $3.5 million in computing power. Between January and August 2021, he mined nearly $1 million worth of Ether, Litecoin, and Monero. Parks laundered the proceeds through exchanges and luxury purchases, including a Mercedes-Benz, before pleading guilty to wire fraud in December 2023. Scams also extended to new token launches. The WEB3 presale, which raised $500,000 in hours, drew scrutiny after ZachXBT linked its team to the failed Squiggles NFT project and alleged scammer Raichu. And in June, the same investigator tied WhiteRock Finance to ZKasino’s $33 million exit scam, exposing what appeared to be a laundering scheme disguised as a real-world asset platformA Solana-based Telegram trading bot project, Aquabot, has allegedly executed a rug pull, disappearing with more than $4.65 million in presale funds just hours before its planned token generation event. On-chain investigator ZachXBT was the first to flag the suspicious activity, noting that Aquabot’s presale wallet moved 21,770 SOL, worth roughly $4.65 million, into multiple intermediary addresses before routing the funds to instant exchanges. The transfers were split into four tranches, a tactic often associated with attempts to obscure transaction trails. Solana Community Warns of Presale Scams After Aquabot Controversy The presale address, identified as 4Ea23VxEGAgfbtauQZz11aKNtzHJwb84ppsg3Cz14u6q, had collected the funds through what the project described as a “gamified” presale mechanism. Investors were told they could receive multipliers on their allocations through a randomizer, and the team initially promised 100% token distribution at launch without vesting. However, shortly before the token generation event, Aquabot altered its terms, imposing vesting on presale buyers. The sudden fund movements came just before the launch, triggering accusations of fraud across the Solana community. Following the transfers, the Aquabot team locked replies on all of its X posts, further fueling concerns. The situation has drawn heightened scrutiny because several high-profile names in the Solana ecosystem had promoted Aquabot. Platforms and teams, including Meteora, Quill Audits, Helius, SYMMIO, and Dialect, amplified the project in recent weeks. Influencers also endorsed the presale, touting its novel approach to distribution and low trading fees compared with competitors. Critics argue that such endorsements have created a false sense of security around the project. “Once again, reputable protocols interact and make partnerships with ruggers, and then they act like nothing happened,” one community member wrote, reflecting growing frustration with repeated presale scams on Solana. Aquabot marketed itself as a low-fee Telegram trading bot, promising a 0.25% transaction fee structure and a novel “liquidity ladder” presale design intended to stagger entry prices for buyers. The approach was pitched as a solution to the “inorganic” trading patterns that often emerge when all presale investors share the same cost basis. Enthusiasm for the model was visible across X, where some users said that they considered replicating the idea for future token launches. Instead, the project appears to have followed a familiar pattern of sudden fund withdrawals and vanished communication channels. With the presale funds now dispersed across exchanges, recovery prospects appear slim. The incident has reignited calls for greater transparency in Solana’s rapidly growing ecosystem. Critics say teams and investors need to exercise far more caution when associating with new projects, particularly those offering novel mechanics or unusually favorable terms. “There can be no tolerance for such behavior. What we need—at the very least—is radical transparency across Solana,” ZachXBT said in his Telegram channel, where he first detailed the transfers. Surge in Solana Presale Scams Raises Investor Concerns This is not the first time the network has faced presale scams; last year, ZachXBT warned that many projects are either fraudulent or on the verge of rug pulls. On Solana, presale hype fueled a wave of rug pulls. Blockchain investigator ZachXBT flagged multiple cases where projects collected millions in SOL before vanishing. One wallet tied to @Sartoshi0x raised 7,000 SOL but withheld 62% of the funds. Another scam directed 2,100 SOL to a fake Jared MEV bot account. Presales by @bluekirbyftm and @Vombatus_eth also collapsed after promises of refunds were broken. In total, just 33 presales pulled in over $150 million in SOL. Despite the risks, Solana’s social metrics surged. LunarCrush reported more than 22.6 million engagements and 121,000 mentions, with Solana’s market cap climbing to $116.7 billion. A $1.65 billion Solana treasury initiative led by Galaxy Digital, Jump Crypto, and Multicoin Capital further boosted confidence in the ecosystem. Meanwhile, in the U.S., federal prosecutors secured a conviction in one of the year’s biggest cryptojacking cases. Charles O. Parks III, known as “CP3O,” was sentenced to one year and a day in prison for defrauding cloud service providers of $3.5 million in computing power. Between January and August 2021, he mined nearly $1 million worth of Ether, Litecoin, and Monero. Parks laundered the proceeds through exchanges and luxury purchases, including a Mercedes-Benz, before pleading guilty to wire fraud in December 2023. Scams also extended to new token launches. The WEB3 presale, which raised $500,000 in hours, drew scrutiny after ZachXBT linked its team to the failed Squiggles NFT project and alleged scammer Raichu. And in June, the same investigator tied WhiteRock Finance to ZKasino’s $33 million exit scam, exposing what appeared to be a laundering scheme disguised as a real-world asset platform

Solana Project Aquabot Vanishes With $4.65M in Presale Rug Pull After Being Promoted by Major Influencers

2025/09/09 06:13
4 min read

A Solana-based Telegram trading bot project, Aquabot, has allegedly executed a rug pull, disappearing with more than $4.65 million in presale funds just hours before its planned token generation event.

On-chain investigator ZachXBT was the first to flag the suspicious activity, noting that Aquabot’s presale wallet moved 21,770 SOL, worth roughly $4.65 million, into multiple intermediary addresses before routing the funds to instant exchanges.

The transfers were split into four tranches, a tactic often associated with attempts to obscure transaction trails.

Solana Community Warns of Presale Scams After Aquabot Controversy

The presale address, identified as 4Ea23VxEGAgfbtauQZz11aKNtzHJwb84ppsg3Cz14u6q, had collected the funds through what the project described as a “gamified” presale mechanism.

Investors were told they could receive multipliers on their allocations through a randomizer, and the team initially promised 100% token distribution at launch without vesting.

However, shortly before the token generation event, Aquabot altered its terms, imposing vesting on presale buyers.

The sudden fund movements came just before the launch, triggering accusations of fraud across the Solana community. Following the transfers, the Aquabot team locked replies on all of its X posts, further fueling concerns.

The situation has drawn heightened scrutiny because several high-profile names in the Solana ecosystem had promoted Aquabot.

Platforms and teams, including Meteora, Quill Audits, Helius, SYMMIO, and Dialect, amplified the project in recent weeks.

Influencers also endorsed the presale, touting its novel approach to distribution and low trading fees compared with competitors.

Critics argue that such endorsements have created a false sense of security around the project.

“Once again, reputable protocols interact and make partnerships with ruggers, and then they act like nothing happened,” one community member wrote, reflecting growing frustration with repeated presale scams on Solana.

Aquabot marketed itself as a low-fee Telegram trading bot, promising a 0.25% transaction fee structure and a novel “liquidity ladder” presale design intended to stagger entry prices for buyers.

The approach was pitched as a solution to the “inorganic” trading patterns that often emerge when all presale investors share the same cost basis.

Enthusiasm for the model was visible across X, where some users said that they considered replicating the idea for future token launches.

Instead, the project appears to have followed a familiar pattern of sudden fund withdrawals and vanished communication channels.

With the presale funds now dispersed across exchanges, recovery prospects appear slim.

The incident has reignited calls for greater transparency in Solana’s rapidly growing ecosystem.

Critics say teams and investors need to exercise far more caution when associating with new projects, particularly those offering novel mechanics or unusually favorable terms.

“There can be no tolerance for such behavior. What we need—at the very least—is radical transparency across Solana,” ZachXBT said in his Telegram channel, where he first detailed the transfers.

Surge in Solana Presale Scams Raises Investor Concerns

This is not the first time the network has faced presale scams; last year, ZachXBT warned that many projects are either fraudulent or on the verge of rug pulls.

On Solana, presale hype fueled a wave of rug pulls. Blockchain investigator ZachXBT flagged multiple cases where projects collected millions in SOL before vanishing.

One wallet tied to @Sartoshi0x raised 7,000 SOL but withheld 62% of the funds. Another scam directed 2,100 SOL to a fake Jared MEV bot account.

Presales by @bluekirbyftm and @Vombatus_eth also collapsed after promises of refunds were broken. In total, just 33 presales pulled in over $150 million in SOL.

Despite the risks, Solana’s social metrics surged. LunarCrush reported more than 22.6 million engagements and 121,000 mentions, with Solana’s market cap climbing to $116.7 billion.

A $1.65 billion Solana treasury initiative led by Galaxy Digital, Jump Crypto, and Multicoin Capital further boosted confidence in the ecosystem.

Meanwhile, in the U.S., federal prosecutors secured a conviction in one of the year’s biggest cryptojacking cases. Charles O. Parks III, known as “CP3O,” was sentenced to one year and a day in prison for defrauding cloud service providers of $3.5 million in computing power.

Between January and August 2021, he mined nearly $1 million worth of Ether, Litecoin, and Monero. Parks laundered the proceeds through exchanges and luxury purchases, including a Mercedes-Benz, before pleading guilty to wire fraud in December 2023.

Scams also extended to new token launches. The WEB3 presale, which raised $500,000 in hours, drew scrutiny after ZachXBT linked its team to the failed Squiggles NFT project and alleged scammer Raichu.
And in June, the same investigator tied WhiteRock Finance to ZKasino’s $33 million exit scam, exposing what appeared to be a laundering scheme disguised as a real-world asset platform.

Market Opportunity
Major Logo
Major Price(MAJOR)
$0.08442
$0.08442$0.08442
-3.40%
USD
Major (MAJOR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, has unveiled new goals for the Ethereum blockchain today at the Japan Developer Conference. The plan lays out short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals touching on L2 interoperability and faster responsiveness among others. In terms of technology, he said again that he is sure that Layer 2 options are the best way […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:15
White House meeting could unfreeze the crypto CLARITY Act this week, but crypto rewards likely to be the price

White House meeting could unfreeze the crypto CLARITY Act this week, but crypto rewards likely to be the price

White House stablecoin meeting could unfreeze the CLARITY Act, but your USDC rewards may be the price The newly confirmed Feb. 10 White House meeting on stablecoin
Share
CryptoSlate2026/02/09 18:48
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28