Nemo protocolNemo protocol

Nemo protocol $2.6m exploit caused by developer’s unaudited code

Nemo protocol published a post-mortem report on the exploit that led to the protocol losing $2.59 million. The report revealed that the exploit was caused by a developer’s code that was unaudited by the MoveBit team.

Summary
  • Nemo protocol’s September 7 exploit was the product of an unaudited code sent through by one of their developers.
  • The exploit led to a loss of $2.4 million that was stolen by the hacker, which was later bridged into Ethereum.

Nemo protocol suffered an exploit on September 7 that resulted in the Total Value Locked plummeting from over $6 million to just around $1.5 million. Around $2.4 million had been stolen from Sui (SUI)-based DeFi yield platform protocol in the attack.

Three days later, the platform came back with a post-mortem report that explains what really led to the exploit.

“Today we are releasing our full incident report to provide transparency into our response, including the root cause, learnings, and next steps,” wrote the protocol in a recent post.

According to the report, an unnamed developer unveiled new features without audit approval and proceeded to deploy them. The developer failed to inform the MoveBit auditors that it was a new addition that got mixed into the old audited fixes.

From this weakness, the attacker took advantage of two main elements. First, a flash loan function that was mistakenly left public instead of private. Second, a flawed pricing function that could change internal contract data even though it was supposed to only read data.

These two system flaws combined allowed the hacker to drain assets from Nemo’s liquidity pool. The stolen funds were later bridged to Ethereum (ETH) through Wormhole CCTP, with $2.4 million currently held in the hacker’s active wallet.

How did the Nemo protocol exploit occur?

When the attack happened, the hacker exploited the system’s vulnerabilities to borrow, swap, and mint tokens in a way that manipulated prices and drained the pool. The Nemo team noticed unusual yields that displayed over 30x returns within the first 30 minutes and paused the protocol through a multi-signature wallet.

At this point, most of the stolen funds had already been moved off-chain.

In response, Nemo took steps to patch the vulnerabilities. The flash loan function was removed, and the pricing tool was corrected so that it cannot alter internal data. The team also fixed another related bug that could affect exchange rates. Emergency audits are underway, and the protocol has promised to bring in multiple security firms for independent reviews of the updated code.

In addition, Nemo protocol plans to reset corrupted on-chain data and rebalance their liquidity pools so the protocol can operate normally again.

What are the next steps?

According to the post-mortem report, Nemo is preparing a compensation plan for affected users. The team is also working with exchanges, security firms, and law enforcement to track the stolen assets and prevent the hacker from liquidating the funds.

Nemo is also looking at long-term changes to improve security. These include stricter controls for upgrades, more robust audits, broader bug bounty programs, and a higher focus on transparency.

For the future, the team is committed to building stronger security practices, better accountability, and closer communication with users in order to re-establish trust and resilience.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Ethereum Price Closer to $4,000 Breakout as ETH Whales go on Buying Spree

Ethereum Price Closer to $4,000 Breakout as ETH Whales go on Buying Spree

The post Ethereum Price Closer to $4,000 Breakout as ETH Whales go on Buying Spree appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Large ETH wallets are buying
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 10:16
New Zealand Dollar weakens below 0.5800 despite Trump’s tariff threats

New Zealand Dollar weakens below 0.5800 despite Trump’s tariff threats

The post New Zealand Dollar weakens below 0.5800 despite Trump’s tariff threats appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The NZD/USD pair loses ground to around 0.5790
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 10:10