This week there was a trend reversal, still led by IBIT from iShares.This week there was a trend reversal, still led by IBIT from iShares.

Very good the Bitcoin ETFs, especially the one from BlackRock

etf bitcoin blackrock

In the last three days, Bitcoin ETFs have consistently recorded net inflows. 

In particular, yesterday they exceeded 700 million dollars, a figure not seen since mid-July. 

Leading the way, as usual, is IBIT, which is the ETF from iShares/BlackRock.

The Inflows on Bitcoin ETFs

Until last week, there was no clear trend, as days of inflows alternated with days of outflows. 

However, starting from Monday, September 8, all sessions have concluded with daily inflows overall.

To be honest, on Tuesday, as many as three different Bitcoin ETFs recorded daily outflows (Fidelity’s FBTC, Bitwise’s BITB, and Ark Invest’s ARKB), but the daily inflow into BlackRock’s IBIT exceeded the sum of the outflows from the other three ETFs. 

In total, over the last three trading sessions, the overall inflows have exceeded 1.1 billion dollars, with 406 million on IBIT, and the remaining 722 million on all other ETFs. 

The IBIT share was therefore 36%.

These are not particularly high numbers, considering that on July 10th alone, inflows exceeded 1.2 billion dollars. 

What matters, however, is that the period of alternating days of inflows and outflows has been interrupted, as this week, so far, no day has ended with outflows. 

Inflows on Ethereum ETFs

For Ethereum, things are going differently. 

In fact, although yesterday there were net inflows totaling 44 million dollars, the previous six trading sessions all ended with daily outflows. 

It should be noted, however, that August 2025 was the best single month ever for spot ETH ETFs, followed by the second-best month ever, which was July 2025. 

In other words, in September the positive trend for Ethereum ETFs came to a halt, and a new positive trend for Bitcoin ETFs seems to have begun. 

Just to provide a frame of reference, up to today Bitcoin ETFs have recorded total net inflows exceeding 55 billion dollars, while those on Ethereum are just under 13. 

It is a ratio of 1 to 4.2 in favor of Bitcoin, which is exactly in line with the market capitalization ratio of BTC to ETH. 

As for the current AUM, BTC ETFs overall exceed 159 billion dollars, while those on Ethereum barely surpass 24 billion. Therefore, the ratio rises to 6.6, still in favor of Bitcoin, probably because the bulk of the inflows into Ethereum have only arrived recently, with the price of ETH already risen, while a good portion of those into Bitcoin arrived already in 2024, when the price was much lower than it is now. 

The role of BlackRock in the crypto market

More than 51% of the current total AUM of Bitcoin ETFs is held by IBIT of BlackRock

The figure is even more striking when considering the overall net inflows, because against a total of 55.6 billion, on IBIT they were even higher than 59 billion. 

The situation might seem absurd, but it should not be forgotten that Grayscale’s GBTC existed even before being converted into an ETF, and over the years it had accumulated too many BTC that it couldn’t liquidate. Once converted into an ETF, it was able to liquidate BTC for almost 23 billion, so much so that the total inflows into all other ETFs excluding IBIT were less than 19 billion. 

BlackRock also dominates among Ethereum ETFs with its ETHA, which even accounts for more than 62% of the total AUM of spot ETH ETFs.

In terms of inflows, ETHA collected a total of 12.7 billion, out of the overall 12.8 billion, also because the Grayscale ETF (ETHE) for the same reason mentioned above recorded almost 4.6 billion in outflows. 

In other words, the spot crypto ETF market in the USA is literally dominated unchallenged by BlackRock. And since other markets around the world are only small fractions of the American one, BlackRock practically dominates globally. 

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Ethereum Price Closer to $4,000 Breakout as ETH Whales go on Buying Spree

Ethereum Price Closer to $4,000 Breakout as ETH Whales go on Buying Spree

The post Ethereum Price Closer to $4,000 Breakout as ETH Whales go on Buying Spree appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Large ETH wallets are buying
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 10:16
New Zealand Dollar weakens below 0.5800 despite Trump’s tariff threats

New Zealand Dollar weakens below 0.5800 despite Trump’s tariff threats

The post New Zealand Dollar weakens below 0.5800 despite Trump’s tariff threats appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The NZD/USD pair loses ground to around 0.5790
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 10:10